Establishment and validation of an immunodiagnostic model for prediction of breast cancer

被引:17
|
作者
Qiu, Cuipeng [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Peng [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Bofei [2 ]
Shi, Jianxiang [2 ,3 ]
Wang, Xiao [2 ,3 ]
Li, Tiandong [1 ,2 ]
Qin, Jiejie [1 ,2 ]
Dai, Liping [2 ,3 ]
Ye, Hua [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Jianying [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Zhengzhou Univ, Coll Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Hlth Stat, Zhengzhou, Henan, Peoples R China
[2] Zhengzhou Univ, Coll Publ Hlth, Henan Key Lab Tumor Epidemiol, Zhengzhou, Henan, Peoples R China
[3] Zhengzhou Univ, Henan Acad Med & Pharmaceut Sci, Zhengzhou, Henan, Peoples R China
来源
ONCOIMMUNOLOGY | 2020年 / 9卷 / 01期
关键词
Autoantibody; breast cancer; tumor-associated antigen; benign breast disease; immunodiagnostic model; TUMOR-ASSOCIATED ANTIGENS; SERUM BIOMARKERS; CYCLIN B1; AUTOANTIBODIES; DIAGNOSIS; TAAS; P53; ANTIBODIES; MARKERS; PROTEIN;
D O I
10.1080/2162402X.2019.1682382
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Serum autoantibodies that react with tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) can be used as potential biomarkers for diagnosis of cancer. This study aims to evaluate the immunodiagnostic value of 11 anti-TAAs autoantibodies for detection of breast cancer (BC) and establish a diagnostic model for distinguishing BC from normal human controls (NHC) and benign breast diseases (BBD). Sera from 10 BC patients and 10 NHC were used to detect 11 anti-TAAs autoantibodies by western blotting. The 11 anti-TAAs autoantibodies were further assessed in 983 sera by relative quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Binary logistic regression and Fisher linear discriminant analysis were conducted to establish a prediction model by using 184 BC and 184 NHC (training cohort, n = 568) and validated by leave-one-out cross-validation. Logistic regression model was selected to establish the prediction model. Results were validated using an independent validation cohort (n = 415). The five anti-TAAs (p53, cyclinB1, p16, p62, 14-3-3 xi) autoantibodies were selected to construct the model with the area under the curve (AUC) of 0.943 (95% CI, 0.919-0.967) in training cohort and 0.916 (95% CI, 0.886-0.947) in the validation cohort. In the identification of BC and BBD, AUCs were 0.881 (95% CI, 0.848-0.914) and 0.849 (95% CI, 0.803-0.894) in training and validation cohort, respectively. In summary, our study indicates that the immunodiagnostic model can distinguish BC from NHC and BC from BBD and this model may have a potential application in immunodiagnosis of breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Establishment of a HER2 positive breast cancer bone metastasis model for validation of novel therapies
    Kahkonen, Tiina E.
    Suominen, Mari I.
    Maki-Jouppila, Jenni H.
    Halleen, Jussi M.
    Bernoulli, Jenni
    Grant, Derek
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2019, 79 (13)
  • [32] An updated PREDICT breast cancer prognostication and treatment benefit prediction model with independent validation
    Candido dos Reis, Francisco J.
    Wishart, Gordon C.
    Dicks, Ed M.
    Greenberg, David
    Rashbass, Jem
    Schmidt, Marjanka K.
    van den Broek, Alexandra J.
    Ellis, Ian O.
    Green, Andrew
    Rakha, Emad
    Maishman, Tom
    Eccles, Diana M.
    Pharoah, Paul D. P.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 19
  • [33] Development and external validation of a prediction model for brain metastases in patients with metastatic breast cancer
    Wu, Qian
    Sun, Ming-Shuai
    Liu, Yin-Hua
    Ye, Jing-Ming
    Xu, Ling
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 149 (13) : 12333 - 12353
  • [34] Development and external validation of a breast cancer absolute risk prediction model in Chinese population
    Yuting Han
    Jun Lv
    Canqing Yu
    Yu Guo
    Zheng Bian
    Yizhen Hu
    Ling Yang
    Yiping Chen
    Huaidong Du
    Fangyuan Zhao
    Wanqing Wen
    Xiao-Ou Shu
    Yongbing Xiang
    Yu-Tang Gao
    Wei Zheng
    Hong Guo
    Peng Liang
    Junshi Chen
    Zhengming Chen
    Dezheng Huo
    Liming Li
    Breast Cancer Research, 23
  • [35] An updated PREDICT breast cancer prognostication and treatment benefit prediction model with independent validation
    Francisco J. Candido dos Reis
    Gordon C. Wishart
    Ed M. Dicks
    David Greenberg
    Jem Rashbass
    Marjanka K. Schmidt
    Alexandra J. van den Broek
    Ian O. Ellis
    Andrew Green
    Emad Rakha
    Tom Maishman
    Diana M. Eccles
    Paul D. P. Pharoah
    Breast Cancer Research, 19
  • [36] Development and validation of a prediction model for the diagnosis of breast cancer based on clinical and ultrasonic features
    He, Xuan
    Lu, Yuanyuan
    Li, Junlai
    GLAND SURGERY, 2023, 12 (06) : 736 - +
  • [37] Development and external validation of a prediction model for brain metastases in patients with metastatic breast cancer
    Qian Wu
    Ming-Shuai Sun
    Yin-Hua Liu
    Jing-Ming Ye
    Ling Xu
    Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 2023, 149 : 12333 - 12353
  • [38] Development and external validation of a breast cancer absolute risk prediction model in Chinese population
    Han, Yuting
    Lv, Jun
    Yu, Canqing
    Guo, Yu
    Bian, Zheng
    Hu, Yizhen
    Yang, Ling
    Chen, Yiping
    Du, Huaidong
    Zhao, Fangyuan
    Wen, Wanqing
    Shu, Xiao-Ou
    Xiang, Yongbing
    Gao, Yu-Tang
    Zheng, Wei
    Guo, Hong
    Liang, Peng
    Chen, Junshi
    Chen, Zhengming
    Huo, Dezheng
    Li, Liming
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2021, 23 (01)
  • [39] Establishment and Validation of a Model for Disease-Free Survival Rate Prediction Using the Combination of microRNA-381 and Clinical Indicators in Patients with Breast Cancer
    Shen, Jun
    Wang, Meng
    Li, Fan
    Yan, Huanhuan
    Wang, Rui
    Zhou, Jun
    BREAST CANCER-TARGETS AND THERAPY, 2022, 14 : 375 - 389
  • [40] Establishment and Validation of Methanogenesis Prediction Model for Biogas Production with Manure Wastewater
    Chen, Honglei
    Yang, Guihua
    Chen, Jiachuan
    Liu, Yu
    2014 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING AND BIOMEDICAL (BEAB 2014), 2014, : 128 - 135