Establishment and validation of an immunodiagnostic model for prediction of breast cancer

被引:17
|
作者
Qiu, Cuipeng [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Peng [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Bofei [2 ]
Shi, Jianxiang [2 ,3 ]
Wang, Xiao [2 ,3 ]
Li, Tiandong [1 ,2 ]
Qin, Jiejie [1 ,2 ]
Dai, Liping [2 ,3 ]
Ye, Hua [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Jianying [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Zhengzhou Univ, Coll Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Hlth Stat, Zhengzhou, Henan, Peoples R China
[2] Zhengzhou Univ, Coll Publ Hlth, Henan Key Lab Tumor Epidemiol, Zhengzhou, Henan, Peoples R China
[3] Zhengzhou Univ, Henan Acad Med & Pharmaceut Sci, Zhengzhou, Henan, Peoples R China
来源
ONCOIMMUNOLOGY | 2020年 / 9卷 / 01期
关键词
Autoantibody; breast cancer; tumor-associated antigen; benign breast disease; immunodiagnostic model; TUMOR-ASSOCIATED ANTIGENS; SERUM BIOMARKERS; CYCLIN B1; AUTOANTIBODIES; DIAGNOSIS; TAAS; P53; ANTIBODIES; MARKERS; PROTEIN;
D O I
10.1080/2162402X.2019.1682382
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Serum autoantibodies that react with tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) can be used as potential biomarkers for diagnosis of cancer. This study aims to evaluate the immunodiagnostic value of 11 anti-TAAs autoantibodies for detection of breast cancer (BC) and establish a diagnostic model for distinguishing BC from normal human controls (NHC) and benign breast diseases (BBD). Sera from 10 BC patients and 10 NHC were used to detect 11 anti-TAAs autoantibodies by western blotting. The 11 anti-TAAs autoantibodies were further assessed in 983 sera by relative quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Binary logistic regression and Fisher linear discriminant analysis were conducted to establish a prediction model by using 184 BC and 184 NHC (training cohort, n = 568) and validated by leave-one-out cross-validation. Logistic regression model was selected to establish the prediction model. Results were validated using an independent validation cohort (n = 415). The five anti-TAAs (p53, cyclinB1, p16, p62, 14-3-3 xi) autoantibodies were selected to construct the model with the area under the curve (AUC) of 0.943 (95% CI, 0.919-0.967) in training cohort and 0.916 (95% CI, 0.886-0.947) in the validation cohort. In the identification of BC and BBD, AUCs were 0.881 (95% CI, 0.848-0.914) and 0.849 (95% CI, 0.803-0.894) in training and validation cohort, respectively. In summary, our study indicates that the immunodiagnostic model can distinguish BC from NHC and BC from BBD and this model may have a potential application in immunodiagnosis of breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Establishment and validation of the survival prediction risk model for appendiceal cancer
    Liu, Tao
    Mi, Junli
    Wang, Yafeng
    Qiao, Wenjie
    Wang, Chenxiang
    Ma, Zhijun
    Wang, Cheng
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [2] Establishment and validation of a prediction model for apnea on bronchiolitis
    Xu, Qiuyan
    Shen, Li
    Lu, Min
    Ran, Shuangqin
    Jiang, Wujun
    Hua, Jun
    Li, Linlin
    FRONTIERS IN PEDIATRICS, 2024, 12
  • [3] Establishment and validation of a prediction model for gestational diabetes
    Wang, Xia
    He, Caidie
    Wu, Nian
    Tian, Yingkuan
    An, Songlin
    Chen, Wei
    Liu, Xiang
    Zhang, Haonan
    Xiong, Shimin
    Liu, Yijun
    Li, Quan
    Zhou, Yuanzhong
    Shen, Xubo
    DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2024, 26 (02): : 663 - 672
  • [4] Validation of a personalized risk prediction model for contralateral breast cancer
    Marzana Chowdhury
    David Euhus
    Banu Arun
    Chris Umbricht
    Swati Biswas
    Pankaj Choudhary
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2018, 170 : 415 - 423
  • [5] Validation of a personalized risk prediction model for contralateral breast cancer
    Chowdhury, Marzana
    Euhus, David
    Arun, Banu
    Umbricht, Chris
    Biswas, Swati
    Choudhary, Pankaj
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2018, 170 (02) : 415 - 423
  • [6] Comprehensive Characterization of the Function of Metabolic Genes and Establishment of a Prediction Model in Breast Cancer
    Yu, Ruijing
    Peng, Mengle
    Zhao, Shuai
    Wang, Zhongquan
    Ma, Yajie
    Zhang, Xinyu
    Lv, Xuefeng
    Wang, Shukai
    Ju, Shaotan
    Zhao, Rongling
    Zhou, Qing
    Lian, Wenping
    DISEASE MARKERS, 2022, 2022
  • [7] IMMUNODIAGNOSTIC ASPECTS OF BREAST-CANCER
    FRITZE, D
    FRITZE, J
    KAUFMANN, M
    DRINGS, P
    DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 1978, 103 (07) : 306 - 308
  • [8] Validation of the online prediction model CancerMath in the Dutch breast cancer population
    Hoveling, Liza A.
    van Maaren, Marissa C.
    Hueting, Tom
    Strobbe, Luc J. A.
    Hendriks, Mathijs P.
    Sonke, Gabe S.
    Siesling, Sabine
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2019, 178 (03) : 665 - 681
  • [9] Validation and update of a lymph node metastasis prediction model for breast cancer
    Qiu, Si-Qi
    Aarnink, Merel
    van Maaren, Marissa C.
    Dorrius, Monique D.
    Bhattacharya, Arkajyoti
    Veltman, Jeroen
    Klazen, Caroline A. H.
    Korte, Jan H.
    Estourgie, Susanne H.
    Ott, Pieter
    Kelder, Wendy
    Zeng, Huan-Cheng
    Koffijberg, Hendrik
    Zhang, Guo-Jun
    van Dam, Gooitzen M.
    Siesling, Sabine
    EJSO, 2018, 44 (05): : 700 - 707
  • [10] Validation of a Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Model Developed for Black Women
    Boggs, Deborah A.
    Rosenberg, Lynn
    Pencina, Michael J.
    Adams-Campbell, Lucile L.
    Palmer, Julie R.
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2013, 105 (05): : 361 - 367