A comparison of different DNA extraction methods and molecular techniques for the detection and identification of foodborne pathogens

被引:2
|
作者
Papatheodorou, Spyridon Andreas [1 ]
Halvatsiotis, Panagiotis [2 ]
Houhoula, Dimitra [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ West Attica, Sch Food Sci, Dept Food Sci & Technol, Aigaleo, Greece
[2] Natl & Kapodistrian Univ Athens, Med Sch, Propaedeut Dept Internal Med 2, ATTIKON Univ Hosp, Chaidari, Greece
来源
AIMS MICROBIOLOGY | 2021年 / 7卷 / 03期
关键词
DNA extraction methods; Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium; Listeria monocytogenes; PCR; LAMP; Limit of detection; MEDIATED ISOTHERMAL AMPLIFICATION; LISTERIA-MONOCYTOGENES;
D O I
10.3934/microbiol.2021019
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Foodborne infections continue to plague Europe. Food safety monitoring is in crisis as the existing techniques for detecting pathogens do not keep up with the global rising of food production and consumption. Thus, the development of innovative techniques for detecting and identifying pathogenic bacteria has become critical. The aim of the present study was firstly to develop an innovative simple and low cost method of extracting bacterial DNA from contaminated food and water samples with Salmonella enteric(a) subsp. enteric(a) serovar Typhimurium and Listeria monocytogenes and its comparison with two commercial DNA extraction kits (Qiagen, MachereyNagel). Finally, pathogens' detection using two molecular techniques (PCR-electrophoresis, LAMP), in order to evaluate the best combination of DNA extraction and identification based on their sensitivity, cost, rapidity and simplicity. Considering the above criteria, among them, best was proved an in-house bacterial DNA extraction method, based on the chloroform-isoamyl alcohol protocol, with certain modifications. This technique showed statistically similar results in terms of sensitivity, compared to the commercial kits, while at the same time maintained high rapidity and much lower cost. Lastly, between the molecular techniques, LAMP was found more promising considering its simplicity, high rapidity and sensitivity. Conclusively, the in-house DNA extraction method along with the LAMP technique, was proven to be the best among the presented combinations.
引用
收藏
页码:304 / 319
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Advances in deoxyribonucleic acid extraction techniques and point-of-care molecular diagnosis of foodborne pathogens
    Sivakumar, Rajamanickam
    Lee, Nae Yoon
    ANALYST, 2023, 148 (14) : 3153 - 3168
  • [22] Comparison of five methods of extraction of Staphylococcus aureus DNA for molecular detection by PCR
    Lara, Maristela Oliveira
    Lucas, Thabata Coaglio
    Kalapothakis, Evanguedes
    Thomasini, Ronaldo Luis
    Machado, Carla Jorge
    REVISTA DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE MEDICINA TROPICAL, 2018, 51 (04) : 528 - 532
  • [23] Advances in DNA Microarray Technology for the Detection of Foodborne Pathogens
    Severgnini, Marco
    Cremonesi, Paola
    Consolandi, Clarissa
    De Bellis, Gianluca
    Castiglioni, Bianca
    FOOD AND BIOPROCESS TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 4 (06) : 936 - 953
  • [24] Advances in DNA Microarray Technology for the Detection of Foodborne Pathogens
    Marco Severgnini
    Paola Cremonesi
    Clarissa Consolandi
    Gianluca De Bellis
    Bianca Castiglioni
    Food and Bioprocess Technology, 2011, 4 : 936 - 953
  • [25] Research Progress of Compound Techniques for Enrichment and Detection of Foodborne Pathogens
    Wang J.
    Shen J.
    Lu L.
    Lu Y.
    Liu Y.
    Xiong X.
    Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2021, 42 (11) : 348 - 355
  • [26] Comparison of DNA extraction methods for identification of human remains
    Pagan, Felicity
    Lim, Cindy
    Keglovic, Mojca
    McNevin, Dennis
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES, 2012, 44 (02) : 117 - 127
  • [27] Conventional and advanced detection techniques of foodborne pathogens: A comprehensive review
    Kabiraz, Meera Probha
    Majumdar, Priyanka Rani
    Mahmud, M. M. Chayan
    Bhowmik, Shuva
    Ali, Azam
    HELIYON, 2023, 9 (04)
  • [28] Chlorine tolerance in foodborne pathogens: definitions, identification methods, and mechanisms
    Wang, Wen
    Liu, Feng
    Huang, Kang
    Yu, Xiaoping
    Xiao, Xingning
    CURRENT OPINION IN FOOD SCIENCE, 2025, 62
  • [29] Comparison of commercial viral genomic extraction kits for the molecular detection of foodborne viruses
    Brassard, Julie
    Lamoureux, Lisyanne
    Gagne, Marie-Josee
    Poitras, Elyse
    Trottier, Yvon-Louis
    Houde, Alain
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY, 2009, 55 (08) : 1016 - 1019
  • [30] Comparison of different DNA extraction techniques to measure oxidative damage in DNA
    Hamilton, ML
    Conrad, C
    Guo, ZM
    Richardson, A
    FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 1998, 25 : S74 - S74