Kidney Deformation and Intraprocedural Registration: A Study of Elements of Image-Guided Kidney Surgery

被引:35
|
作者
Altamar, Hernan O. [1 ]
Ong, Rowena E. [2 ]
Glisson, Courtenay L. [2 ]
Viprakasit, Davis P. [3 ]
Miga, Michael I. [2 ]
Herrell, Stanley Duke [3 ]
Galloway, Robert L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Uniformed Serv Univ Hlth Sci, Dept Surg, Bethesda, MD 20814 USA
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Nashville, TN 37235 USA
[3] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Urol Surg, Nashville, TN 37235 USA
关键词
POINT-BASED REGISTRATION; SYSTEM; REPLACEMENT; SURFACE; ERROR;
D O I
10.1089/end.2010.0249
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Central to any image-guided surgical procedure is the alignment of image and physical coordinate spaces, or registration. We explored the task of registration in the kidney through in vivo and ex vivo porcine animal models and a human study of minimally invasive kidney surgery. Methods: A set of (n = 6) ex vivo porcine kidney models was utilized to study the effect of perfusion and loss of turgor caused by incision. Computed tomography (CT) and laser range scanner localizations of the porcine kidneys were performed before and after renal vessel clamping and after capsular incision. The da Vinci (TM) robotic surgery system was used for kidney surface acquisition and registration during robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. The surgeon acquired the physical surface data points with a tracked robotic instrument. These data points were aligned to preoperative CT for surface-based registrations. In addition, two biomechanical elastic computer models (isotropic and anisotropic) were constructed to simulate deformations in one of the kidneys to assess predictive capabilities. Results: The mean displacement at the surface fiducials (glass beads) in six porcine kidneys was 4.4 +/- 2.1 mm (range 3.4-6.7 mm), with a maximum displacement range of 6.1 to 11.2 mm. Surface-based registrations using the da Vinci robotic instrument in robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy yielded mean and standard deviation closest point distances of 1.4 and 1.1 mm. With respect to computer model predictive capability, the target registration error was on average 6.7 mm without using the model and 3.2 mm with using the model. The maximum target error reduced from 11.4 to 6.2 mm. The anisotropic biomechanical model yielded better performance but was not statistically better. Conclusions: An initial point-based alignment followed by an iterative closest point registration is a feasible method of registering preoperative image (CT) space to intraoperative physical (robot) space. Although rigid registration provides utility for image-guidance, local deformations in regions of resection may be more significant. Computer models may be useful for prediction of such deformations, but more investigation is needed to establish the necessity of such compensation.
引用
收藏
页码:511 / 517
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The application accuracy of different registration methods in frameless image-guided surgery
    Li, QH
    Zamorano, L
    Pandya, A
    Gong, JX
    Perez, R
    Diaz, F
    [J]. CARS 2000: COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOLOGY AND SURGERY, 2000, 1214 : 987 - 987
  • [32] Minimization of target registration error for vertebra in image-guided spine surgery
    Ershad, Marzieh
    Ahmadian, Alireza
    Serej, Nassim Dadashi
    Saberi, Hooshang
    Khoiy, Keyvan Amini
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOLOGY AND SURGERY, 2014, 9 (01) : 29 - 38
  • [33] Minimization of target registration error for vertebra in image-guided spine surgery
    Marzieh Ershad
    Alireza Ahmadian
    Nassim Dadashi Serej
    Hooshang Saberi
    Keyvan Amini Khoiy
    [J]. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 2014, 9 : 29 - 38
  • [34] Automatic Geometric Rectification for Patient Registration in Image-guided Spinal Surgery
    Cai, Yunliang
    Olson, Jonathan D.
    Fan, Xiaoyao
    Evans, Linton T.
    Paulsen, Keith D.
    Roberts, David W.
    Mirza, Sohail K.
    Lollis, S. Scott
    Ji, Songbai
    [J]. MEDICAL IMAGING 2016: IMAGE-GUIDED PROCEDURES, ROBOTIC INTERVENTIONS, AND MODELING, 2016, 9786
  • [35] Template-based registration for image-guided skull base surgery
    Eggers, Georg
    Muehling, Joachim
    [J]. OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2007, 136 (06) : 907 - 913
  • [36] Evaluation of 3 Different Registration Techniques in Image-Guided Bimaxillary Surgery
    Sun, Yi
    Luebbers, Heinz-Theo
    Agbaje, Jimoh Olubanwo
    Schepers, Serge
    Vrielinck, Luc
    Lambrichts, Ivo
    Politis, Constantinus
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2013, 24 (04) : 1095 - 1099
  • [37] Comparison and assessment of semi-automatic image segmentation in computed tomography scans for image-guided kidney surgery
    Glisson, Courtenay L.
    Altamar, Hernan O.
    Herrell, S. Duke
    Clark, Peter
    Galloway, Robert L.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (11) : 6265 - 6274
  • [38] Validation of anatomical landmarks-based registration for image-guided surgery: An in-vitro study
    Sun, Yi
    Luebbers, Heinz-Theo
    Agbaje, Jimoh Olubanwo
    Schepers, Serge
    Vrielinck, Luc
    Lambrichts, Ivo
    Politis, Constantinus
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2013, 41 (06) : 522 - 526
  • [39] A dynamic point matching for registration in image-guided minimally invasive vascular surgery: A simulation study
    Gao, Wenpeng
    Fu, Yili
    Li, Zaijuan
    Liu, Hao
    Wang, Shuguo
    [J]. 2013 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOTICS AND BIOMIMETICS (ROBIO), 2013, : 2019 - 2024
  • [40] Rigid point cloud registration based on correspondence cloud for image-to-patient registration in image-guided surgery
    Li, Zhihao
    Wang, Manning
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 51 (07) : 4554 - 4566