A multivariate method for meta-analysis and comparison of diagnostic tests

被引:17
|
作者
Dimou, Niki L. [1 ]
Adam, Maria [1 ]
Bagos, Pantelis G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Thessaly, Dept Comp Sci & Biomed Informat, Papasiopoulou 2-4, Lamia 35100, Greece
关键词
meta-analysis; diagnostic tests; SROC method; ODDS RATIO; DISEASE PREVALENCE; TEST ACCURACY; SPECIFICITY; SENSITIVITY; MODELS; CURVE; UNIFICATION; DEPENDENCE; REGRESSION;
D O I
10.1002/sim.6919
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
We present here an extension of the classic bivariate random effects meta-analysis for the log-transformed sensitivity and specificity that can be applied for two or more diagnostic tests. The advantage of this method is that a closed-form expression is derived for the calculation of the within-studies covariances. The method allows the direct calculation of sensitivity and specificity, as well as, the diagnostic odds ratio, the area under curve and the parameters of the summary receiver operator's characteristic curve, along with the means for a formal comparison of these quantities for different tests. There is no need for individual patient data or the simultaneous evaluation of both diagnostic tests in all studies. The method is simple and fast; it can be extended for several diagnostic tests and can be fitted in nearly all statistical packages. The method was evaluated in simulations and applied in a meta-analysis for the comparison of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody and rheumatoid factor for discriminating patients with rheumatoid arthritis, with encouraging results. Simulations suggest that the method is robust and more powerful compared with the standard bivariate approach that ignores the correlation between tests. Copyright (c) 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:3509 / 3523
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic tests for diagnosis of melioidosis
    Fairley, Lachlan
    Smith, Samuel
    Maisrikrod, Shalisa
    Henning, Lars
    ACTA TROPICA, 2021, 214
  • [22] Meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of screening tests for colorectal cancer
    Slivinskas, JC
    Gagnon, YM
    Levy, AR
    Enns, RA
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2005, 8 (03) : 343 - 343
  • [23] Meta-analysis: yield of diagnostic tests for coeliac disease in dyspepsia
    Ford, A. C.
    Ching, E.
    Moayyedi, P.
    ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2009, 30 (01) : 28 - 36
  • [24] Rapid Diagnostic Tests for Group A Streptococcal Pharyngitis: A Meta-analysis
    Lean, Wei Ling
    Arnup, Sarah
    Danchin, Margie
    Steer, Andrew C.
    PEDIATRICS, 2014, 134 (04) : 771 - 781
  • [25] Meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of screening tests for colorectal cancer
    Slivinskas, J
    Gagnon, Y
    Enns, R
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 99 (10): : S328 - S329
  • [26] Meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of screening tests for colorectal cancer
    Slivinskas, J
    Gagnon, YM
    Enns, R
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2004, 7 (06) : 683 - 683
  • [27] Empirical Comparison of Publication Bias Tests in Meta-Analysis
    Lin, Lifeng
    Chu, Haitao
    Murad, Mohammad Hassan
    Hong, Chuan
    Qu, Zhiyong
    Cole, Stephen R.
    Chen, Yong
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2018, 33 (08) : 1260 - 1267
  • [28] Empirical Comparison of Publication Bias Tests in Meta-Analysis
    Lifeng Lin
    Haitao Chu
    Mohammad Hassan Murad
    Chuan Hong
    Zhiyong Qu
    Stephen R. Cole
    Yong Chen
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2018, 33 : 1260 - 1267
  • [29] Comparison of diagnostic performance between conventional and ultrasensitive rapid diagnostic tests for diagnosis of malaria: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yimam, Yonas
    Mohebali, Mehdi
    Afshar, Mohammad Javad Abbaszadeh
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (02):
  • [30] A Method of Moments Estimator for Random Effect Multivariate Meta-Analysis
    Chen, Han
    Manning, Alisa K.
    Dupuis, Josee
    BIOMETRICS, 2012, 68 (04) : 1278 - 1284