A multivariate method for meta-analysis and comparison of diagnostic tests

被引:17
|
作者
Dimou, Niki L. [1 ]
Adam, Maria [1 ]
Bagos, Pantelis G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Thessaly, Dept Comp Sci & Biomed Informat, Papasiopoulou 2-4, Lamia 35100, Greece
关键词
meta-analysis; diagnostic tests; SROC method; ODDS RATIO; DISEASE PREVALENCE; TEST ACCURACY; SPECIFICITY; SENSITIVITY; MODELS; CURVE; UNIFICATION; DEPENDENCE; REGRESSION;
D O I
10.1002/sim.6919
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
We present here an extension of the classic bivariate random effects meta-analysis for the log-transformed sensitivity and specificity that can be applied for two or more diagnostic tests. The advantage of this method is that a closed-form expression is derived for the calculation of the within-studies covariances. The method allows the direct calculation of sensitivity and specificity, as well as, the diagnostic odds ratio, the area under curve and the parameters of the summary receiver operator's characteristic curve, along with the means for a formal comparison of these quantities for different tests. There is no need for individual patient data or the simultaneous evaluation of both diagnostic tests in all studies. The method is simple and fast; it can be extended for several diagnostic tests and can be fitted in nearly all statistical packages. The method was evaluated in simulations and applied in a meta-analysis for the comparison of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody and rheumatoid factor for discriminating patients with rheumatoid arthritis, with encouraging results. Simulations suggest that the method is robust and more powerful compared with the standard bivariate approach that ignores the correlation between tests. Copyright (c) 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:3509 / 3523
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multivariate random effects meta-analysis of diagnostic tests with multiple thresholds
    Hamza, Taye H.
    Arends, Lidia R.
    van Houwelingen, Hans C.
    Stijnen, Theo
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2009, 9
  • [2] Statistical methods for multivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic tests: An overview and tutorial
    Ma, Xiaoye
    Nie, Lei
    Cole, Stephen R.
    Chu, Haitao
    [J]. STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2016, 25 (04) : 1596 - 1619
  • [3] Multivariate random effects meta-analysis of diagnostic tests with multiple thresholds
    Taye H Hamza
    Lidia R Arends
    Hans C van Houwelingen
    Theo Stijnen
    [J]. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 9
  • [4] Meta-analysis for diagnostic tests
    Hartzes, Anastasia M.
    Morgan, Charity J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 26 (01) : 68 - 71
  • [5] Meta-analysis for diagnostic tests
    Anastasia M. Hartzes
    Charity J. Morgan
    [J]. Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, 2019, 26 : 68 - 71
  • [6] A simple and robust method for multivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy
    Chen, Yong
    Liu, Yulun
    Chu, Haitao
    Lee, Mei-Ling Ting
    Schmid, Christopher H.
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2017, 36 (01) : 105 - 121
  • [7] Network meta-analysis for diagnostic tests
    O'Sullivan, Jack W.
    [J]. BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE, 2019, 24 (05) : 192 - 193
  • [8] Proportional odds ratio model for comparison of diagnostic tests in meta-analysis
    Siadaty M.S.
    Shu J.
    [J]. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 4 (1)
  • [9] Systematic reviews and meta-analysis of diagnostic tests
    Halligan, S
    [J]. CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2005, 60 (09) : 977 - 979
  • [10] Meta-analysis of diagnostic tests for acute sinusitis
    Engels, EA
    Terrin, N
    Barza, M
    Lau, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2000, 53 (08) : 852 - 862