Post-disaster reconstruction: A current analysis of Gujarat's response after the 2001 earthquake

被引:7
|
作者
Powell, Plato Jack
机构
[1] Independent Researcher, Bristol, London
来源
关键词
donor-driven reconstruction; owner-driven reconstruction; post-disaster reconstruction; structural vulnerability; 2001 Gujarat earthquake;
D O I
10.1080/17477891.2011.597839
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Post-disaster reconstruction is a complex process that involves the interaction of social, technological and economic factors. The most important goal of any post-disaster reconstruction programme must be to reduce the long-term vulnerability of affected communities through the construction of multi-hazard proof housing and appropriate knowledge transfer. Post-disaster reconstruction is an ever-evolving process and there is by no means a perfect solution that will apply to every disaster. It is essential that academics, governments and humanitarian agencies learn from previous applications of this process in order to not only implement programmes that reduce the current vulnerability but also to establish a legacy of disaster-risk reduction. This paper examines the current structural vulnerabilities of different post-disaster reconstruction approaches implemented after the 2001 Gujarat earthquake. Field research involved visual surveys and questionnaires. This research highlighted a number of issues that would affect the current vulnerability of the buildings' stock in the event of further earthquakes. The paper highlights that there was a high level of technical knowledge transfer in Gujarat after the earthquake, but unfortunately this knowledge transfer did not shape a legacy of disaster-risk reduction. There were also a number of significant issues that were the result of inadequate policies implemented by the Indian Government. The issues established through this paper are ones that need to be recognized by academics, governments and implementation agencies, and considered in the implementation of post-disaster reconstruction programmes in the future.
引用
收藏
页码:279 / 292
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Post-Disaster Reconstruction - Lessons from Aceh
    Robinson, Priscilla
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2011, 35 (05) : 498 - 498
  • [32] Allocation of post-disaster reconstruction financing to housing
    Freeman, PK
    BUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION, 2004, 32 (05): : 427 - 437
  • [33] A framework for managing post-disaster housing reconstruction
    Bilau, Abdulquadri Ade
    Witt, Emlyn
    Lill, Irene
    8TH NORDIC CONFERENCE ON CONSTRUCTION ECONOMICS AND ORGANIZATION, 2015, 21 : 313 - 320
  • [34] Japan's Post-Disaster Economic Reconstruction: From Kobe to Tohoku
    Hayashi, Toshihiko
    ASIAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2012, 26 (03) : 189 - 210
  • [35] Analysis on Key Points of the post-disaster reconstruction engineering cost management
    Li, Jingya
    ADVANCES IN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, PTS 1-3, 2011, 94-96 : 306 - 309
  • [36] A Bibliometric Analysis and Review of Building Information Modelling for Post-Disaster Reconstruction
    Baarimah, Abdullah O.
    Alaloul, Wesam Salah
    Liew, M. S.
    Kartika, Widya
    Al-Sharafi, Mohammed A.
    Musarat, Muhammad Ali
    Alawag, Aawag Mohsen
    Qureshi, Abdul Hannan
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (01)
  • [37] Communicating with communities (CwC) during post-disaster reconstruction: an initial analysis
    Serena Tagliacozzo
    Michele Magni
    Natural Hazards, 2016, 84 : 2225 - 2242
  • [38] Factors affecting post-disaster location choices of businesses: an analysis of the 1999 earthquake
    Orhan, Ezgi
    ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2017, 16 (04): : 363 - 382
  • [39] Communicating with communities (CwC) during post-disaster reconstruction: an initial analysis
    Tagliacozzo, Serena
    Magni, Michele
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2016, 84 (03) : 2225 - 2242
  • [40] The analysis and solvement of some geotechnical topics in post-disaster reconstruction highway
    Chai, Hejun
    Zhang, Changlin
    Meng, Yunwei
    Li, Haiping
    ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION, PTS 1 AND 2, 2011, 97-98 : 69 - 72