Allergic contact and photoallergic contact dermatitis to plant and pesticide allergens

被引:27
|
作者
Mark, KA
Brancaccio, RR
Soter, NA
Cohen, DE
机构
[1] NYU, Sch Med, Ronald O Perrelman Dept Dermatol, Occupat & Environm Dermatol Allergy Sect, New York, NY USA
[2] NYU, Sch Med, Ronald O Perrelman Dept Dermatol, Photomed Sect, New York, NY USA
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archderm.135.1.67
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Background: The panel of patch test allergens used for the evaluation of patients with suspected photoallergy typically does not include plant and pesticide allergens. The prevalence of allergic contact dermatitis and photoallergic contact dermatitis to plant and pesticide allergens was determined for this subgroup of patients. Observation: Positive reactions were detected in 12 of 26 patients who were tested with our photoallergen series: 5 with allergic contact dermatitis, 5 with photoallergic contact dermatitis, and 2 with both. Four of the 12 patients had positive patch and photo-patch test reactions to plant allergens, pesticide allergens, or both. The positive patch test reactions were to the plants Taraxacum officinale (dandelion) and Tanacetum vulgare (tansy) and to the pesticides folpet and captafol. Positive photopatch test reactions were to the pesticides folpet and captan. The histories of the patients suggested that 2 or 3 of the 4 patients had clinically relevant reactions. In the other 8 patients, positive reactions to the patch and photopatch tests included fragrances, sunscreens, and antibacterial agents. Conclusion: Plant and pesticide allergens should be included in the patch and photo-patch test series used for the evaluation of patients with suspected photoallergy.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 70
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Allergic contact dermatitis to nonmethacrylate nail allergens in the UK
    Eleftheriadou, V.
    Roche, L.
    Bourke, J. F.
    Buckley, D. A.
    Orton, D. I.
    Stone, N. M.
    Wilkinson, S. M.
    Thompson, D. A.
    Johnston, G. A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2020, 183 (04) : 754 - 756
  • [22] Gender differences in allergic contact dermatitis to common allergens
    Boonchai, Waranya
    Likittanasombat, Surachanee
    Viriyaskultorn, Noldtawat
    Kanokrungsee, Silada
    CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2024, 90 (05) : 458 - 465
  • [23] Allergic and photoallergic contact dermatitis to Olaquindox in a pig breeder with prolonged photosensitivity
    Belhadjali, H
    Marguery, MC
    Journé, F
    Giordano-Labadie, F
    Lefebvre, H
    Bazex, J
    PHOTODERMATOLOGY PHOTOIMMUNOLOGY & PHOTOMEDICINE, 2002, 18 (01) : 52 - 53
  • [24] Risk factors and common contact allergens in facial allergic contact dermatitis patients
    Kasemsarn, Pranee
    Iamphonrat, Thanawan
    Boonchai, Waranya
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2016, 55 (04) : 417 - 424
  • [25] Photoallergic contact dermatitis to topical ketoconazole
    Martinez-Domenech, A.
    Garcia-Legaz-Martinez, M.
    Valenzuela-Onate, C.
    Magdaleno-Tapial, J.
    Zaragoza-Ninet, V.
    Sanchez-Carazo, J. L.
    Perez-Ferriols, A.
    JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY AND VENEREOLOGY, 2020, 34 (09) : E499 - E501
  • [26] PHOTOALLERGIC CONTACT-DERMATITIS TO CARBIMAZOLE
    GOH, CL
    NG, SK
    CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1985, 12 (01) : 58 - 59
  • [27] Occupational carprofen photoallergic contact dermatitis
    Kerr, A. C.
    Muller, F.
    Ferguson, J.
    Dawe, R. S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2008, 159 (06) : 1303 - 1308
  • [28] Concomitant development of photoallergic contact dermatitis from ketoprofen and allergic contact dermatitis from menthol and rosin (colophony) in a compress
    Ota, Tomoko
    Oiso, Naoki
    Iba, Yoshinori
    Narita, Tomohiko
    Kawara, Shigeru
    Kawada, Akira
    CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2007, 56 (01) : 47 - U8
  • [29] Photoallergic Contact Dermatitis: No Fun in the Sun
    Guenther, Jana
    Johnson, Hadley
    Yu, JiaDe
    Adler, Brandon L.
    CUTIS, 2022, 110 (05): : 241 - 267
  • [30] PHOTOALLERGIC CONTACT-DERMATITIS TO OXYBENZONE
    COLLINS, P
    FERGUSON, J
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 1994, 131 (01) : 124 - 129