Allergic contact and photoallergic contact dermatitis to plant and pesticide allergens

被引:27
|
作者
Mark, KA
Brancaccio, RR
Soter, NA
Cohen, DE
机构
[1] NYU, Sch Med, Ronald O Perrelman Dept Dermatol, Occupat & Environm Dermatol Allergy Sect, New York, NY USA
[2] NYU, Sch Med, Ronald O Perrelman Dept Dermatol, Photomed Sect, New York, NY USA
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archderm.135.1.67
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Background: The panel of patch test allergens used for the evaluation of patients with suspected photoallergy typically does not include plant and pesticide allergens. The prevalence of allergic contact dermatitis and photoallergic contact dermatitis to plant and pesticide allergens was determined for this subgroup of patients. Observation: Positive reactions were detected in 12 of 26 patients who were tested with our photoallergen series: 5 with allergic contact dermatitis, 5 with photoallergic contact dermatitis, and 2 with both. Four of the 12 patients had positive patch and photo-patch test reactions to plant allergens, pesticide allergens, or both. The positive patch test reactions were to the plants Taraxacum officinale (dandelion) and Tanacetum vulgare (tansy) and to the pesticides folpet and captafol. Positive photopatch test reactions were to the pesticides folpet and captan. The histories of the patients suggested that 2 or 3 of the 4 patients had clinically relevant reactions. In the other 8 patients, positive reactions to the patch and photopatch tests included fragrances, sunscreens, and antibacterial agents. Conclusion: Plant and pesticide allergens should be included in the patch and photo-patch test series used for the evaluation of patients with suspected photoallergy.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 70
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Allergic and photoallergic contact dermatitis to chlorpromazine
    Martinez-Domenech, Alvaro
    Garcia-Legaz Martinez, Marta
    Ferrer-Guillen, Blanca
    Magdaleno-Tapial, Jorge
    Valenzuela-Onate, Cristian
    Esteve-Martinez, Altea
    Zaragoza-Ninet, Violeta
    Perez-Ferriols, Amparo
    [J]. AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2020, 61 (03) : E351 - E353
  • [2] Allergic contact dermatitis and photoallergic contact dermatitis due to soaps and detergents
    DoomsGoossens, A
    Blockeel, I
    [J]. CLINICS IN DERMATOLOGY, 1996, 14 (01) : 67 - 76
  • [3] Photoallergic contact dermatitis
    Foti, C.
    Bonamonte, D.
    Cassano, N.
    Vena, G. A.
    Angelini, G.
    [J]. GIORNALE ITALIANO DI DERMATOLOGIA E VENEREOLOGIA, 2009, 144 (05): : 515 - 525
  • [4] PHOTOALLERGIC AND ALLERGIC CONTACT-DERMATITIS FROM DIBENZOYLMETHANES
    SCHAUDER, S
    IPPEN, H
    [J]. PHOTODERMATOLOGY, 1986, 3 (03) : 140 - 147
  • [5] Photoallergic Contact Dermatitis
    Özge Aşkın
    Seher Küçükoğlu Cesur
    Burhan Engin
    Yalçın Tüzün
    [J]. Current Dermatology Reports, 2019, 8 : 157 - 163
  • [6] Photoallergic contact dermatitis
    Kerr, Alastair
    Ferguson, James
    [J]. PHOTODERMATOLOGY PHOTOIMMUNOLOGY & PHOTOMEDICINE, 2010, 26 (02) : 56 - 65
  • [7] PHOTOALLERGIC CONTACT DERMATITIS
    EPSTEIN, S
    ENTA, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1965, 194 (09): : 1016 - &
  • [8] Photoallergic Contact Dermatitis
    Askin, Ozge
    Cesur, Seher Kucukoglu
    Engin, Burhan
    Tuzun, Yalcin
    [J]. CURRENT DERMATOLOGY REPORTS, 2019, 8 (04) : 157 - 163
  • [9] Photoallergic contact dermatitis
    Goossens, A
    [J]. PHOTODERMATOLOGY PHOTOIMMUNOLOGY & PHOTOMEDICINE, 2004, 20 (03) : 121 - 125
  • [10] Photoallergic contact dermatitis
    Consuegra Romero, Germana
    Castro Gutierrez, Beatriz
    Gonzalez Lopez, Marcos A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2017, 38 : E4 - E5