Should you sign your reviews? Open peer review and review quality

被引：5

|

作者：

Zhang, Don C. ^{[1
]}

Smith, Rachel Williamson ^{[1
]}

Lobo, Sheryl ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Louisiana State Univ, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA

来源：

INDUSTRIAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-PERSPECTIVES ON SCIENCE AND PRACTICE | 2020年 / 13卷 / 01期

关键词：

ACCOUNTABILITY;

D O I：

10.1017/iop.2020.5

中图分类号：

B849 [应用心理学];

学科分类号：

040203 ;

摘要：

引用

收藏

页码：45 / 47

页数：3

相关论文

共 50 条

[31] PEER REVIEW - SHOULD AUTHOR BE ANONYMOUS
LAITINEN, HA
[J]. ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1977, 49 (01) : 1 - 1
[32] Peer Review: It Should Be an Honorary Process
Sarr, Michael G.
[J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2020, 272 (01) : 44 - 44
[33] PEER-REVIEW - SHOULD IT BE BLIND
NEGUS, D
[J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1983, 70 (11) : 697 - 697
[34] NSF wants you for peer review
Ellis, AB
[J]. CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS, 2003, 81 (12) : 3 - 3
[35] PEER-REVIEW - WHATS IN IT FOR YOU
SWANK, S
[J]. MUSEUM NEWS, 1985, 64 (02): : 32 - 35
[36] ENDOCRINE REVIEWS and the peer-review process
Caron, MG
[J]. ENDOCRINE REVIEWS, 1997, 18 (01) : 3 - 3
[37] Improving the peer review of narrative literature reviews
Jennifer A. Byrne
[J]. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 1 (1)
[38] Open access, open data and peer review
Ule, Jernej
[J]. GENOME BIOLOGY, 2020, 21 (01)
[39] Advancing an Open Ethos with Open Peer Review
Ford, Emily
[J]. COLLEGE & RESEARCH LIBRARIES, 2017, 78 (04): : 406 - 412
[40] QUALITY REVIEW AND YOU
HUFF, BN
KELLEY, TP
[J]. JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTANCY, 1989, 167 (02): : 34 - &

← 1 2 3 4 5 →