A Comparative Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety, and Immunogenicity of YLB113 and the Etanercept Reference Product for the Treatment of Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

被引:17
|
作者
Yamanaka, Hisashi [1 ]
Kamatani, Naoyuki [2 ]
Tanaka, Yoshiya [3 ]
Hibino, Toshihiko [4 ]
Drescher, Edit [5 ]
Sanchez-Burson, Juan [6 ]
Rettenbacher, Manfred [7 ]
Bhatia, Girish [8 ]
Gadve, Snehal [9 ]
Shah, Chirag [9 ]
Bakhle, Dhananjay [9 ]
机构
[1] Tokyo Womens Med Univ, Inst Rheumatol, Tokyo, Japan
[2] StaGen, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Univ Occupat & Environm Hlth, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan
[4] YL Biol Ltd, Tokyo, Japan
[5] Vital Med Ctr, Veszprem, Hungary
[6] Hosp Infanta Luisa, Seville, Spain
[7] Lupin Atlantis Holdings SA, Zug, Switzerland
[8] Medipoint Hosp Pvt Ltd, Pune, Maharashtra, India
[9] Lupin Ltd, Lupin Res Pk, Pune, Maharashtra, India
关键词
Anti-TNF; Etanercept; Rheumatoid arthritis; Treatment; METHOTREXATE; MANAGEMENT; PROTEIN;
D O I
10.1007/s40744-019-00186-3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction YLB113 is a biosimilar of the reference product (RP), etanercept, under development for treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and other approved indications. A phase 3 study was conducted in Europe, Japan, and India to compare the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of YLB113 with the RP over a treatment period of 52 weeks. Methods Overall, 528 patients with moderate-to-severe RA receiving concomitant methotrexate were randomized to receive a once-weekly, subcutaneous dose of 50 mg YLB113 or the RP. The primary endpoint was ACR20 response rate at week 24, with similarity confirmed if the 95% confidence interval (CI) for YLB113 and the RP was within the range of - 15 to 15%. Safety and immunogenicity endpoints were assessed to week 52. Results Based on the European analysis, in the full analysis set, ACR20 response at week 24 was 83.3% and 88.5% for YLB113 and the RP, respectively. Responses were within the predefined clinical equivalence margin. The sensitivity analysis in the per protocol set revealed a similar proportion of subjects exhibiting ACR20 response at week 24 between groups, with a difference of - 5.1% (95% CI - 11.07 to 0.81). The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was comparable between groups, and the incidence of antidrug antibody development to week 24 favored YLB113 (0.8 vs. 8.3%). Conclusions This study demonstrated biosimilarity of YLB113 to the RP regarding efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity in patients with moderate-to-severe RA. Based on the same mechanism of action, biosimilarity could be extrapolated to other therapeutic indications approved for etanercept.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 163
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of GP2015, an etanercept biosimilar, compared with the reference etanercept in patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis: 24-week results from the comparative phase III, randomised, double-blind EQUIRA study
    Matucci-Cerinic, Marco
    Allanore, Yannick
    Kavanaugh, Arthur
    Buch, Maya H.
    Schulze-Koops, Hendrik
    Kucharz, Eugeniusz J.
    Woehling, Heike
    Babic, Goran
    Poetzl, Johann
    Davis, Adanna
    Schwebig, Arnd
    RMD OPEN, 2018, 4 (02):
  • [32] Comparative efficacy and safety of etanercept and adalimumab in the treatment of polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis
    Ge, Lanlan
    Gao, Yu
    Chen, Xin
    Guo, Jingxiao
    Zhang, Dongfeng
    Yang, Yanjun
    BMC PEDIATRICS, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [33] Clinical efficacy and safety of etanercept plus methotrexate or etanercept alone in rheumatoid arthritis patients with inadequate response to methotrexate: The ADORE study
    Taggart, A. J.
    van Riel, P. L. C. M.
    Reynolds, A.
    Sany, J.
    Gaubitz, M.
    Phillips, C.
    Pedersen, R.
    Singh, A.
    MacPeek, D.
    RHEUMATOLOGY, 2006, 45 : I45 - I45
  • [34] Efficacy and safety of combination etanercept and methotrexate versus etanercept alone in patients with rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to methotrexate: the ADORE study
    van Riel, P. L. C. M.
    Taggart, A. J.
    Sany, J.
    Gaubitz, M.
    Nab, H. W.
    Pedersen, R.
    Freundlich, B.
    MacPeek, D.
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2006, 65 (11) : 1478 - 1483
  • [35] Meta-analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Adalimumab, Etanercept, and Infliximab for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis
    Wiens, Astrid
    Venson, Rafael
    Correr, Cassyano J.
    Otuki, Michel Fleith
    Pontarolo, Roberto
    PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2010, 30 (04): : 339 - 353
  • [36] The safety and efficacy of etanercept on cardiac functions and lipid profile in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis
    Kaya, M. G.
    Senel, S.
    Cobankara, V.
    Taskoylu, O.
    Karasu, U.
    Karapinar, H.
    Erdis, E.
    Evrengul, H.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2016, 37 : 948 - 948
  • [37] The Safety and Efficacy of Etanercept on Cardiac Functions and Lipid Profile in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
    Senel, Soner
    Cobankara, Veli
    Taskoylu, Ozgur
    Karasu, Ugur
    Karapinar, Hekim
    Erdis, Eda
    Evrengul, Harun
    Kaya, Mehmet Gungor
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2012, 60 (01) : 62 - 65
  • [38] Comparative study of the efficacy and safety of aceclofenac and tenoxicam in rheumatoid arthritis
    PerezRuiz, F
    AlonsoRuiz, A
    Ansoleaga, JJ
    CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 1996, 15 (05) : 473 - 477
  • [39] A randomized double-blind controlled study evaluating the safety and efficacy of etanercept vs etanercept plus anakinra in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
    Genovese, MC
    Cohen, SB
    Moreland, LW
    Lium, D
    Liu, T
    Newmark, R
    Bekker, P
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2003, 62 : 66 - 66
  • [40] Comparative efficacy and safety of etanercept biosimilars in comparison with etanercept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who have insufficient response to methotrexate: A network meta-analysis
    Lee, Young Ho
    Song, Gwan Gyu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2021, 59 (12) : 760 - 767