Biolimus-Coated Balloon in Small-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease The BIO-RISE CHINA Study

被引:22
|
作者
Xu, Kai [1 ]
Fu, GuoSheng [2 ]
Tong, Qian [3 ]
Liu, Bin [4 ]
Han, XueBin [5 ]
Zhang, Jun [6 ]
Ma, GenShan [7 ]
Yang, Qing [8 ]
Li, Hui [9 ]
Zhou, Yujie [10 ]
Jing, Quanmin [1 ]
Li, Yi [1 ]
Han, YaLing [1 ]
机构
[1] Northern Theater Command, Gen Hosp, Shenyang, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ, Sir Run Run Shaw Hosp, Sch Med, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Jilin Univ, Hosp 1, Changchun, Peoples R China
[4] Jilin Univ, Hosp 2, Changchun, Peoples R China
[5] Shanxi Cardiovasc Hosp, Taiyuan, Shanxi, Peoples R China
[6] Cangzhou Cent Hosp, Cangzhou, Peoples R China
[7] Southeast Univ, Zhongda Hosp, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[8] Tianjin Med Univ, Gen Hosp, Tianjin, Peoples R China
[9] Daqing Oilfield Gen Hosp, Daqing, Peoples R China
[10] Beijing Anzhen Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
biolimus; drug-coated balloon; small-vessel disease; DRUG-ELUTING STENT; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcin.2022.03.024
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Drug-coated balloons are a safe and effective option for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, but prior randomized studies have exclusively used paclitaxel-coated devices. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to assess for the first time the safety and efficacy of a novel biolimus-coated balloon (BCB) in patients with small-vessel coronary disease. METHODS In a prospective trial conducted at 10 centers in China, 212 patients with small-vessel native coronary disease (reference vessel diameter 2.0-2.75 mm, lesion length <= 25 mm) were randomized to receive a BCB or an uncoated balloon. The primary endpoint was in-segment late lumen loss at 9 months. RESULTS In the per-protocol population, angiographic late lumen loss at 9 months was 0.16 +/- 0.29 mm in the BCB group vs 0.30 +/- 0.35 mm with the plain balloon (P = 0.001). Late luminal enlargement (positive remodeling) occurred in 29.7% of patients in the BCB group vs 9.8% of patients with plain balloons (P = 0.007). In the full analysis set population, after 12 months, target lesion failure rates were 6.7% in the BCB group vs 13.9% with the plain balloon (HR: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.19-1.16), and rates of the patient-oriented clinical outcome were 14.3% with the BCB vs 21.8% with the plain balloon (HR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.33-1.24). CONCLUSIONS In this first-in-human study, a novel BCB showed superior efficacy to plain balloon angioplasty in patients with small-vessel coronary disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Positive vascular remodeling was more frequent, and there was a trend toward improved clinical outcomes. (A Randomized Trial of a Biolimus-Coated Balloon Versus POBA in Small Vessel Coronary Artery Disease [Brave]; NCT03769623) (C) 2022 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
引用
收藏
页码:1219 / 1226
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Efficacy of Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty for De Novo Small Coronary Artery Disease
    Suzuki, Yoriyasu
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 74 (13) : B268 - B268
  • [22] Cerebral Small-Vessel Disease in Individuals with a Family History of Coronary Heart Disease: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study
    Johansen, Michelle C.
    Nyquist, Paul
    Sullivan, Kevin J.
    Fornage, Myriam
    Gottesman, Rebecca F.
    Becker, Diane M.
    NEUROEPIDEMIOLOGY, 2021, 55 (04) : 316 - 322
  • [23] Safety and Efficacy of Sirolimus Coated Balloon for the Treatment of Coronary Small Vessel Disease: Results from Real World Multicenter Study
    Cortese, Bernardo
    Dani, Sameer
    Parikh, Keyur
    Shetty, Ranjan
    Kumar, N. Prathap
    Hiremath, Jagdish
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 69 (16) : S20 - S20
  • [24] Drug Coated Balloon (DCB)-Only Angioplasty in De Novo Large Vessel vs. Small Vessel Coronary Disease
    Wickramarachchi, Upul
    Corballis, Natasha
    Maart, Clint
    Sulfi, Sreekumar
    Wistow, Trevor
    Ryding, Alisdair
    Sarev, Toomas
    Gilbert, Timothy
    Skinner, Jane
    Flather, Marcus
    Eccleshall, Simon
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 76 (17) : B109 - B109
  • [25] Systematic Review on Role of Drug Eluting Stent (DES) Versus Drug-Coated Balloon (DCB) in Small Vessel Coronary Artery Disease
    Mutema, Motisola
    Shenoy, Vishnu
    Sardar, Partha
    Parikh, Sahil
    Chatterjee, Saurav
    CURRENT CARDIOLOGY REPORTS, 2024, 26 (07) : 681 - 688
  • [26] HISTOLOGIC EVIDENCE FOR SMALL-VESSEL CORONARY-ARTERY DISEASE IN PATIENTS WITH ANGINA-PECTORIS AND PATENT LARGE CORONARY-ARTERIES
    MOSSERI, M
    YAROM, R
    GOTSMAN, MS
    HASIN, Y
    CIRCULATION, 1986, 74 (05) : 964 - 972
  • [27] Individual patient data meta-analysis of paclitaxel-coated balloons vs. drug-eluting stents for small-vessel coronary artery disease: the ANDROMEDA study
    Fezzi, Simone
    Giacoppo, Daniele
    Fahrni, Gregor
    Latib, Azeem
    Alfonso, Fernando
    Colombo, Antonio
    Mahfoud, Felix
    Scheller, Bruno
    Jeger, Raban
    Cortese, Bernardo
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2025,
  • [28] A Meta-Analysis of Drug-Coated Balloon Versus Drug-Eluting Stent in De Novo Small Vessel Coronary Artery Disease
    Al-Abcha, Abdullah
    Elkhatib, Layan
    Boumegouas, Manel
    Kemnic, Tyler
    Herzallah, Khader
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 76 (17) : B108 - B109
  • [29] The comparative short-term efficacy and safety of drug-coated balloon vs. drug-eluting stent for treating small-vessel coronary artery lesions in diabetic patients
    Li, Kui
    Cui, Kaijun
    Dan, Xuechuan
    Feng, Jian
    Pu, Xiaobo
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 10
  • [30] Drug-Coated Balloon Versus Drug-Eluting Stent for the Treatment of Small-Vessel Disease: 2-Year Clinical Outcomes of the RESTORE SVD China Randomized Trial
    Tian, Jian
    Tang, Yida
    Guan, Changdong
    Qiao, Shubin
    Gao, Run-Lin
    Xu, Bo
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 74 (13) : B258 - B258