EFFECTS OF PONDEROSA PINE FOREST RESTORATION ON HABITAT FOR BATS

被引:6
|
作者
Johnson, Shelly A. [1 ,2 ]
Chambers, Carol L. [1 ]
机构
[1] No Arizona Univ, Sch Forestry, Box 15018, Flagstaff, AZ 86011 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Dept Wildlife Ecol & Conservat, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
关键词
SOUTHERN BRITISH-COLUMBIA; CAVITY-NESTING BIRDS; NORTHERN ARIZONA; WESTERN OREGON; ARTIFICIAL ROOSTS; DWELLING BATS; INSECTIVOROUS BATS; BURNING TREATMENTS; DOMINATED FORESTS; FORAGING BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.3398/064.077.0308
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) forests in the southwestern United States, used by 16 species of bats, are managed with thinning and prescribed fire to restore tree densities and fire regimes to conditions that existed prior to Euro-American settlement. Using 2 approaches (roosting and foraging) to categorize forest habitat for bats, we evaluated how restoration treatments may affect habitat use. We hypothesized that more foraging activity would occur in thinned stands because more species are adapted to open forest, but that more roosts would occur in unthinned stands where snags were unaffected by mechanical treatments and prescribed fire. During the summers of 2006 and 2007, we used acoustic detectors to record call rates of bats as a measure of activity level and compared activity levels among stands that had undergone 3 thinning treatments (light, moderate, and heavy, with 245, 172, or 142 trees per hectare postthinning, respectively) and an unthinned stand as a control (1201 trees per hectare). With radiotelemetry, we located roosts used by reproductive females of 2 common species of forest-associated bats (long-eared myotis, Myotis evotis, and Arizona myotis, Myotis occultus) during summer 2007. We measured roost characteristics at 3 spatial scales (roost, microplot, and surrounding landscape) to contrast between roosts used by Myotis species and randomly selected comparison snags, microplots, and study area landscape. Among thinned and unthinned stands we did not detect a difference in activity levels for all bats (P = 0.2), nor a difference in call rates for Myotis spp. (P = 0.1). However, there was lower activity (P = 0.01) for non-Myotis bats in unthinned compared to thinned stands. This is probably because most non-Myotis species are better adapted to foraging in open forests. Of 24 roosts for long-eared myotis and Arizona myotis, only 31% and 25%, respectively, occurred in thinned stands. Bats selected large-diameter (> 68 cm diameter at breast height) ponderosa pine snags with exfoliating bark. Roosts for Arizona myotis were in areas with elements of old-growth structure, whereas roosts for long-eared myotis occurred in areas similar to stratified, midsuccessional, even-aged forest. Managing for large-diameter ponderosa pine snags and a variety of tree densities and age classes will provide roosting and foraging habitat for bats. We found no distinct "best" treatment to recommend overall, likely because of species differences, with some bats better adapted to opencanopy and some to closed-canopy forest. Maintaining diverse habitat will support a diverse bat assemblage.
引用
收藏
页码:355 / 368
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Habitat of birds in ponderosa pine and aspen/birch forest in the Black Hills, South Dakota
    Mills, TR
    Rumble, MA
    Flake, LD
    JOURNAL OF FIELD ORNITHOLOGY, 2000, 71 (02) : 187 - 206
  • [22] Use of restoration-treated ponderosa pine forest by tassel-eared squirrels
    Loberger, Chad D.
    Theimer, Tad C.
    Rosenstock, Steven S.
    Wightman, Catherine S.
    JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY, 2011, 92 (05) : 1021 - 1027
  • [23] Herbaceous vegetation responses (1992-2004) to restoration treatments in a Ponderosa pine forest
    Moore, MM
    Casey, CA
    Bakker, JD
    Springer, JD
    Fulé, PZ
    Covington, WW
    Laughlin, DC
    RANGELAND ECOLOGY & MANAGEMENT, 2006, 59 (02) : 135 - 144
  • [24] NATIVE PLANTS DOMINATE UNDERSTORY VEGETATION FOLLOWING PONDEROSA PINE FOREST RESTORATION TREATMENTS
    Stoddard, Michael T.
    McGlone, Christopher M.
    Fule, Peter Z.
    Laughlin, Daniel C.
    Daniels, Mark L.
    WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2011, 71 (02) : 206 - 214
  • [25] Antelope bitterbrush flowering, survival, and regeneration following ponderosa pine forest restoration treatments
    Bedunah, DJ
    Pflug, KD
    Jones, TE
    SEED AND SOIL DYNAMICS IN SHRUBLAND ECOSYSTEMS: PROCEEDINGS, 2004, 31 : 149 - 155
  • [26] Nitrogen spatial heterogeneity influences diversity following restoration in a Ponderosa Pine Forest, Montana
    Gundale, MJ
    Metlen, KL
    Fiedler, CE
    DeLuca, TH
    ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2006, 16 (02) : 479 - 489
  • [27] The Economics of Ecological Restoration and Hazardous Fuel Reduction Treatments in the Ponderosa Pine Forest Ecosystem
    Taylor, Michael H.
    Meador, Andrew J. Sanchez
    Kim, Yeon-Su
    Rollins, Kimberly
    Will, Hank
    FOREST SCIENCE, 2015, 61 (06) : 988 - 1008
  • [28] DEBRIS ACCUMULATION IN A PONDEROSA PINE FOREST
    AGEE, JK
    BISWELL, HH
    CALIFORNIA AGRICULTURE, 1970, 24 (06) : 6 - &
  • [29] Simulating effects of climate change and ecological restoration on fire behaviour in a south-western USA ponderosa pine forest
    Honig, Kristen A.
    Fule, Peter Z.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WILDLAND FIRE, 2012, 21 (06) : 731 - 742
  • [30] Forest-floor treatments in Arizona ponderosa pine restoration ecosystems: No short-term effects on plant communities
    Abella, Scott R.
    Covington, W. Wallace
    WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2007, 67 (01) : 120 - 132