High-quality endoscope reprocessing decreases endoscope contamination

被引:25
|
作者
Decristoforo, P. [1 ]
Kaltseis, J. [1 ]
Fritz, A. [1 ]
Edlinger, M. [2 ]
Posch, W. [1 ]
Wilflingseder, D. [1 ]
Lass-Floerl, C. [1 ]
Orth-Hoeller, D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Innsbruck, Div Hyg & Med Microbiol, Schopfstr 41, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
[2] Med Univ Innsbruck, Dept Med Stat Informat & Hlth Econ, Innsbruck, Austria
关键词
Automated endoscope reprocessor; Contamination; Gastrointestinal endoscope; Guideline; High-level disinfection; Microbiological surveillance; GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY; TRANSMISSION; INFECTION; SURVEILLANCE; COLONOSCOPY; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.cmi.2018.01.017
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Objectives: Several outbreaks of severe infections due to contamination of gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopes, mainly duodenoscopes, have been described. The rate of microbial endoscope contamination varies dramatically in literature. The aim of this multicentre prospective study was to evaluate the hygiene quality of endoscopes and automated endoscope reprocessors (AERs) in Tyrol/Austria. Methods: In 2015 and 2016, a total of 463 GI endoscopes and 105 AERs from 29 endoscopy centres were analysed by a routine (R) and a combined routine and advanced (CRA) sampling procedure and investigated for microbial contamination by culture-based and molecular-based analyses. Results: The contamination rate of GI endoscopes was 1.3%-4.6% according to the national guideline, suggesting that 1.3-4.6 patients out of 100 could have had contacts with hygiene-relevant microorganisms through an endoscopic intervention. Comparison of R and CRA sampling showed 1.8% of R versus 4.6% of CRA failing the acceptance criteria in phase I and 1.3% of R versus 3.0% of CRA samples failing in phase II. The most commonly identified indicator organism was Pseudomonas spp., mainly Pseudomonas oleovorans. None of the tested viruses were detected in 40 samples. While AERs in phase I failed (n = 9, 17.6%) mainly due to technical faults, phase II revealed lapses (n = 6, 11.5%) only on account of microbial contamination of the last rinsing water, mainly with Pseudomonas spp. Conclusions: In the present study the contamination rate of endoscopes was low compared with results from other European countries, possibly due to the high quality of endoscope reprocessing, drying and storage. (c) 2018 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1101.e1 / 1101.e6
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Assessment of a novel approach to evaluate the outcome of endoscope reprocessing
    Tietz, A
    Dangel, M
    Widmer, AF
    INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2004, 25 (11): : 897 - 899
  • [42] Endoscope reprocessing: How to perform an adequate air drying?
    Beilenhoff, Ulrike
    ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN, 2023, 11 (04) : E440 - E442
  • [43] Assessment of a novel approach to evaluate the outcome of endoscope reprocessing
    Sciortino, CV
    Xia, EL
    Mozee, A
    INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2004, 25 (04): : 284 - 290
  • [44] Are current endoscope reprocessing procedures effective in clinical practice?
    Moses, FM
    Lee, J
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2000, 51 (04) : AB60 - AB60
  • [45] Gastrointestinal endoscope reprocessing: Current and previous practices.
    Cheung, R
    Ortiz, D
    Allen, M
    DiMarino, A
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1998, 47 (04) : AB46 - AB46
  • [46] CONTAMINATION OF FIBEROPTIC UPPER INTESTINAL ENDOSCOPE
    KAPLAN, LR
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1979, 242 (05): : 415 - 415
  • [47] Costs involved in compliance with new endoscope reprocessing guidelines
    Hoffman, David
    Cool, Christina
    CLINICAL ENDOSCOPY, 2024, 57 (04) : 534 - 541
  • [48] Adverse staff health outcomes associated with endoscope reprocessing
    Gutterman, Elane
    Jorgensen, Lindsay
    Mitchell, Amber
    Fua, Sherry
    Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology, 2013, 47 (02): : 172 - 179
  • [49] Reported gastrointestinal endoscope reprocessing lapses: The tip of the iceberg
    Langlay, Alexandra M. Dirlam
    Ofstead, Cori L.
    Mueller, Natalie J.
    Tosh, Pritish K.
    Baron, Todd H.
    Wetzler, Harry P.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2013, 41 (12) : 1188 - 1194
  • [50] New tool addresses flexible endoscope reprocessing failures
    不详
    AORN JOURNAL, 2017, 106 (03) : P5 - P5