Performance assessment of primary petroleum production cogeneration plants

被引:10
|
作者
Barbosa, Yuri M. [1 ]
da Silva, Julio A. M. [1 ]
Junior, Silvio de O. [2 ]
Torres, Ednildo A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Bahia, Salvador, BA, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
Cogeneration plant; CO2; emission; Exergy analysis; Primary petroleum production; Off-design operation; FPSO; OIL; PLATFORMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2018.07.014
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
The cogeneration plant of offshore platforms has to supply utilities following the production of the platform. This production varies yearly and also depends on the mode of operation of the platform, which varies depending on the quantity of oil, gas and water produced. The variable demand for power and heat makes the selection of cogeneration technology for offshore platforms a tricky task. A methodology for this purpose is presented and gas turbines (conventional technology), reciprocating engines, a steam plant and a combined cycle are evaluated. The design point for each cogeneration plant is defined to meet the highest heat and power demands using as much as possible of exhaust gases energy. Load distribution between boilers, internal combustion engines, steam turbines and supplementary firing is optimized for each cogeneration plant yearly. The average exergy efficiency, specific CO2 emission and the quantity of natural gas saved are evaluated over the lifespan of the oilfield considered. It is showed that the use of reciprocating engines represents a fuel saving of up 308,300 t of natural gas in comparison with gas turbines which represents a reduction in the CO2 released to atmosphere of about 800,000 t. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:233 / 244
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] COGENERATION ECONOMICS FOR PROCESS PLANTS
    AHNER, DJ
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 1984, 91 (17) : 177 - &
  • [32] Application of thermoeconomics to the allocation of environmental loads in the life cycle assessment of cogeneration plants
    González, A
    Sala, JM
    Flores, I
    López, LM
    [J]. ENERGY, 2003, 28 (06) : 557 - 574
  • [33] Performance assessment of cogeneration and trigeneration systems for small scale applications
    Angrisani, Giovanni
    Akisawa, Atsushi
    Marrasso, Elisa
    Roselli, Carlo
    Sasso, Maurizio
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 125 : 194 - 208
  • [34] Performance assessment of a 5 kW SOFC cogeneration fuel cell
    Lerson, S.
    Lilien, J. L.
    Minne, G.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2008, 9 (04) : 426 - 433
  • [35] ASPEN simulation of cogeneration plants
    Zheng, LG
    Furimsky, E
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2003, 44 (11) : 1845 - 1851
  • [36] SIZE OPTIMIZATION FOR COGENERATION PLANTS
    EHMKE, HJ
    [J]. ENERGY, 1990, 15 (01) : 35 - 44
  • [37] Energetic and economic assessment of cogeneration plants: A comparative design and experimental condition study
    Badami, M.
    Camillieri, F.
    Portoraro, A.
    Vigliani, E.
    [J]. ENERGY, 2014, 71 : 255 - 262
  • [38] On the Teaching of Performance Evaluation and Assessment of a Combined Cycle Cogeneration System
    Arnas, A. Oezer
    Boettner, Daisie D.
    Norberg, Seth A.
    Tamm, Gunnar
    Whipple, Jason R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2009, 131 (02): : 0255011 - 0255017
  • [39] State of development of cogeneration plants
    Schemenau, Wolfgang
    [J]. District heating, 1988, 17 (03): : 167 - 173
  • [40] Financing structures for cogeneration plants
    Suri, R
    [J]. COGENERATION: POLICIES, POTENTIAL, AND TECHNOLOGIES, 1997, : 59 - 76