Utilisation of systemic therapy options in routine treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in Australia

被引:2
|
作者
Delahunty, Rachel [1 ]
Lee, Margaret [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wong, Hui-Li [3 ]
Johns, Julie [3 ]
Mckendrick, Joseph [1 ]
Lee, Belinda [3 ]
Kosmider, Suzanne [2 ]
Cooray, Prasad [1 ]
Ananda, Sumitra [2 ,4 ]
Desai, Jayesh [4 ]
Tran, Ben [2 ,4 ]
Tie, Jeanne [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Gibbs, Peter [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Wong, Rachel [1 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Eastern Hlth, Dept Med Oncol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Western Hlth, Dept Med Oncol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Walter & Eliza Inst Med Res, Div Syst Biol & Personalised Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Royal Melbourne Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[5] Monash Univ, Fac Med Nursing & Hlth Sci, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
cancer; colorectal; metastatic; treatment; Australia; 1ST-LINE TREATMENT; PHASE-III; FLUOROURACIL; CHEMOTHERAPY; IRINOTECAN; SURVIVAL; PATTERNS; FOLFIRI; OXALIPLATIN; MULTICENTER;
D O I
10.1111/imj.14288
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: In the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), exposure to all three active cytotoxic agents, 5-fluorouracil/capecitabine, irinotecan and oxaliplatin, improves overall survival. The addition of biologic agents (bevacizumab and cetuximab/panitumumab) further improves survival. The uptake of available systemic agents for mCRC in routine practice in Australia is poorly described. Aim: The aim of this study was to assess the real-world treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in Melbourne, Australia's second largest city. Methods: The ACCORD database was interrogated to determine demographics, treatments and outcomes for patients diagnosed with mCRC between 1 January 2011 and 1 January 2016 at six Melbourne centres. Results: About 1130 mCRC patients were identified: median age was 69 years (range 26-105); 61% had synchronous disease. KRAS status was known in 62%, of whom 49% were KRAS wild-type. At the time of analysis, 67% of all patients had commenced systemic treatment, 50% had received two or more lines of therapy and 19% of KRAS wild-type patients had received all five active drugs. Of KRAS-mutated patients, 35% had received all four Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme-reimbursed active drugs. Patients who had not received chemotherapy included 72 patients who underwent meta-stasectomy alone. At a median follow up of 34 months, median overall survival was 25 months for all patients and 69 months for those who underwent metastasectomy. Conclusion: In this community-based cohort, 33% of patients had not received any systemic therapy for mCRC, and few patients had received all available active systemic agents. As many patients remain alive, these figures will likely increase over time. The overall survival of patients with mCRC in this community-based cohort was 25 months and not dissimilar to that achieved in recent clinical trials.
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 172
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Treatment options in BRAF-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer
    Bernabe-Ramirez, Carolina
    Patel, Rajvi
    Chahal, Jaspreet
    Saif, Muhammad Wasif
    [J]. ANTI-CANCER DRUGS, 2020, 31 (06) : 545 - 557
  • [32] Targeting metastatic colorectal cancer - present and emerging treatment options
    Ciombor, Kristen K.
    Berlin, Jordan
    [J]. PHARMACOGENOMICS & PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2014, 7 : 137 - 144
  • [33] Molecular Landscape and Treatment Options for Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
    Miyamoto Y.
    Zhang W.
    Lenz H.-J.
    [J]. Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2017, 8 (4) : 580 - 590
  • [34] Options for Second-Line Treatment in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
    Lee, James J.
    Sun, Weijing
    [J]. CLINICAL ADVANCES IN HEMATOLOGY & ONCOLOGY, 2016, 14 (01) : 46 - 54
  • [35] Optimal duration of systemic treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer
    Simkens, Lieke H. J.
    Koopman, Miriam
    Punt, Cornelis J. A.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ONCOLOGY, 2014, 26 (04) : 448 - 453
  • [36] Current and future systemic treatment options in metastatic pancreatic cancer
    Arslan, Cagatay
    Yalcin, Suayib
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 5 (04) : 280 - 295
  • [37] Options for metastatic colorectal cancer beyond the second line of treatment
    Foubert, Fanny
    Matysiak-Budnik, Tamara
    Touchefeu, Yann
    [J]. DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2014, 46 (02) : 105 - 112
  • [38] Treatment options after regorafenib failure in metastatic colorectal cancer
    Eraslan, E.
    Dogan, M.
    Yildiz, F.
    Ilhan, A.
    Oksuzoglu, O. B.
    [J]. EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 25 (09) : 3470 - 3477
  • [39] Treatment options after regorafenib failure in metastatic colorectal cancer
    Berretta, M.
    Fiorica, F.
    Quagliariello, V.
    Laterza, M. M.
    Facchini, G.
    Montopoli, M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 25 (13) : 4441 - 4442
  • [40] Maintenance Therapy in the Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
    Grothey, Axel
    [J]. ONCOLOGY-NEW YORK, 2015, 29 (08): : 560 - +