Intravascular ultrasound-guided versus coronary angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:22
|
作者
Groenland, Frederik T. W. [1 ]
Neleman, Tara [1 ]
Kakar, Hala [1 ]
Scoccia, Alessandra [1 ]
des Plantes, Annemieke C. Ziedses [1 ]
Clephas, Pascal R. D. [1 ]
Chatterjee, Sraman [1 ]
Zhu, Mahova [1 ]
den Dekker, Wijnand K. [1 ]
Diletti, Roberto [1 ]
Zijlstra, Felix [1 ]
Mahmoud, Karim D. [1 ]
Van Mieghem, Nicolas M. [1 ]
Daemen, Joost [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, Dept Cardiol, Thoraxcenter, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Acute myocardial infarction; Coronary angiography; Intravascular ultrasound; Percutaneous coronary intervention; STENT IMPLANTATION; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; PLAQUE RUPTURE; ARTERY-DISEASE; CREDO-KYOTO; GUIDANCE; IVUS; JAPANESE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.01.021
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) can overcome the intrinsic limitations of coronary angiography for lesion assessment and stenting. IVUS improves outcomes of patients presenting with stable or complex coronary artery disease, but dedicated data on the impact of IVUS-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains scarce.& nbsp;Methods: We systematically searched Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Google Scholar for studies that compared clinical outcomes for IVUS-versus angio-guided PCI in patients with AMI. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality and the secondary endpoint major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model was used to calculate pooled risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).& nbsp;Results: Nine studies (8 observational, 1 RCT) with a total of 838.902 patients (796.953 angio-guided PCI, 41.949 IVUS-guided PCI) were included. In patients with AMI, IVUS-guided PCI was associated with a significantly lower risk of all-cause mortality (pooled RR: 0.70; 95% CI, 0.59-0.82; p < 0.01), MACE (pooled RR: 0.86; 95% CI, 0.74-0.99; p = 0.04) and target vessel revascularization (TVR) (pooled RR: 0.83; 95% CI, 0.73-0.95; p < 0.01). In the subset of patients presenting with ST-segment elevation, IVUS-guided PCI remained associated with a reduced risk for both all-cause mortality (pooled RR: 0.79; 95% CI, 0.66-0.95, p = 0.01) and MACE (pooled RR: 0.86; 95% CI, 0.74-0.99, p = 0.04).& nbsp;Conclusions: This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis comparing IVUS-versus angio-guided PCI in patients with AMI, showing a beneficial effect of IVUS-guided PCI on all-cause mortality, MACE and TVR. Results of ongoing dedicated prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 42
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Mohan, Gautham Varun Krishna
    Babar, Nawabzada Nadir
    Sompalli, Sindhuja
    Mian, Muhammad Umar
    Israr, Farhan
    Chaudhari, Sandipkumar S.
    Wei, Calvin R.
    Allahwala, Danish
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (09)
  • [2] Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided versus Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Kalsi, Jasmeet K.
    Suffredini, John
    Koh, Stephanie
    Khalid, Umair
    Denktas, Ali E.
    Alam, Mahboob
    Kayani, Waleed T.
    Jia, Xiaoming
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2023, 148
  • [3] Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided versus Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Stent Thrombosis Elevation Myocardial Infarction: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Kalsi, Jasmeet
    Suffredini, John M.
    Koh, Stephanie
    Liu, Jing
    Khalid, Mirza U.
    Denktas, Ali
    Alam, Mahboob
    Kayani, Waleed
    Jia, Xiaoming
    [J]. CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 149 (03) : 196 - 204
  • [4] Intravascular ultrasound-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock
    Lee, Oh-Hyun
    Heo, Seok-Jae
    Johns, Thomas W.
    Kim, Yongcheol
    Cho, Deok-Kyu
    Kim, Jung-Sun
    Kim, Byeong-Keuk
    Choi, Donghoon
    Hong, Myeong-Ki
    Jang, Yangsoo
    Jeong, Myung Ho
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01): : 10028
  • [5] Intravascular Ultrasound Imaging-Guided Versus Coronary Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Darmoch, Fahed
    Alraies, M. Chadi
    Al-Khadra, Yasser
    Pacha, Homam Moussa
    Pinto, Duane S.
    Osborn, Eric A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2020, 9 (05):
  • [6] Intravascular modality-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction
    Kim, Namkyun
    Lee, Jang Hoon
    Jang, Se Yong
    Hwan, Myung
    Yang, Dong Heon
    Park, Hun Sik
    Cho, Yongkeun
    Jeong, Myung Ho
    Park, Jong-Seon
    Kim, Hyo-Soo
    Hur, Seung-Ho
    Seong, In-Whan
    Cho, Myeong-Chan
    Kim, Chong-Jin
    Chae, Shung Chull
    [J]. CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2020, 95 (04) : 696 - 703
  • [7] Outcomes of Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Chronic Total Occlusions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Chugh, Yashasvi
    Buttar, Rupinder
    Kwan, Tak
    Vemmou, Evangelia
    Karacsonyi, Judit
    Nikolakopoulos, Ilia
    Garcia, Santiago
    Goessl, Mario
    Wang, Yale
    Chavez, Ivan
    Poulose, Anil
    Burke, M. Nicholas
    Brilakis, Emmanouil S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 34 (04): : E310 - +
  • [8] Intravascular ultrasound-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in unprotected left main coronary artery disease: A systematic review
    Mrevlje, Blaz
    McFadden, Eugene
    de la Torre Hernandez, Jose M.
    Testa, Luca
    De Maria, Giovanni Luigi
    Banning, Adrian P.
    Spitzer, Ernest
    [J]. CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2024, 59 : 99 - 108
  • [9] Intravascular imaging guided versus coronary angiography guided percutaneous coronary intervention: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Khan, Safi U.
    Agarwal, Siddharth
    Arshad, Hassaan B.
    Akbar, Usman Ali
    Mamas, Mamas A.
    Arora, Shilpkumar
    Baber, Usman
    Goel, Sachin S.
    Kleiman, Neal S.
    Shah, Alpesh R.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 383
  • [10] Intravascular Imaging-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials
    Sreenivasan, Jayakumar
    Reddy, Rohin K.
    Jamil, Yasser
    Malik, Aaqib
    Chamie, Daniel
    Howard, James P.
    Nanna, Michael G.
    Mintz, Gary S.
    Maehara, Akiko
    Ali, Ziad A.
    Moses, Jeffrey W.
    Chen, Shao-Liang
    Chieffo, Alaide
    Colombo, Antonio
    Leon, Martin B.
    Lansky, Alexandra J.
    Ahmad, Yousif
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2024, 13 (02):