Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Mohan, Gautham Varun Krishna [1 ]
Babar, Nawabzada Nadir [2 ,3 ]
Sompalli, Sindhuja [4 ]
Mian, Muhammad Umar [5 ]
Israr, Farhan [6 ,7 ]
Chaudhari, Sandipkumar S. [8 ,9 ]
Wei, Calvin R. [10 ]
Allahwala, Danish [11 ]
机构
[1] Tirunelveli Med Coll, Internal Med, Tirunelveli, India
[2] Combined Mil Hosp CMH, Lahore Med Coll, Internal Med, Lahore, Pakistan
[3] Inst Dent, Lahore, Pakistan
[4] JSS Med Coll, Internal Med, Hyderabad, India
[5] Allama Iqbal Med Coll, Internal Med, Lahore, Pakistan
[6] Khyber Med Coll, Med, Peshawar, Pakistan
[7] Lady Reading Hosp, Internal Med, Peshawar, Pakistan
[8] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Cardiothorac Surg, Birmingham, AL USA
[9] Univ North Dakota, Family Med, Sch Med & Hlth Sci, Fargo, ND USA
[10] Shing Huei Grp, Res & Dev, Taipei, Taiwan
[11] Fatima Mem Hosp, Nephrol, Karachi, Pakistan
关键词
angiography-guided pci; intravascular imaging-guided pci; intravascular imaging-guided; cardiovascular; outcomes; systematic review and meta analysis; angiography-guided; percutaneous coronary intervention; STENT IMPLANTATION; OUTCOMES; TRIAL; IVUS;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.69167
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
This meta-analysis evaluated the clinical outcomes of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). A comprehensive literature search was conducted across major electronic databases, identifying relevant studies published up to August 15, 2024. Thirteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) met the inclusion criteria, comparing IVUS-guided and angiography-guided PCI. The primary outcomes were major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and stent thrombosis, while secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, myocardial infarction, and revascularization rates. Pooled analysis revealed that IVUS-guided PCI significantly reduced the risk of MACE (risk ratio (RR): 0.63, 95% CI: 0.50-0.79) and stent thrombosis (RR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.30-0.90) compared to angiography-guided PCI. Secondary outcomes also favored IVUS guidance, with significant reductions in cardiac mortality, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization (TLR), and target vessel revascularization (TVR). While a trend towards reduced allcause mortality was observed with IVUS guidance, it did not reach statistical significance. Notably, low heterogeneity across studies strengthened the reliability of these findings. Meta-regression analysis indicated that the presence of myocardial infarction did not significantly moderate the effect of IVUS on clinical outcomes, suggesting consistent benefits across patient subgroups. These results highlight the potential of IVUS-guided PCI to improve cardiovascular outcomes and reduce the need for repeat procedures. The findings support the growing body of evidence favoring IVUS use in PCI, particularly in complex lesions and high-risk patients. However, considerations such as cost-effectiveness and the need for specialized training remain important factors in the widespread adoption of IVUS-guided PCI in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Intravascular Ultrasound Imaging-Guided Versus Coronary Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Darmoch, Fahed
    Alraies, M. Chadi
    Al-Khadra, Yasser
    Pacha, Homam Moussa
    Pinto, Duane S.
    Osborn, Eric A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2020, 9 (05):
  • [2] Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided versus Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Kalsi, Jasmeet K.
    Suffredini, John
    Koh, Stephanie
    Khalid, Umair
    Denktas, Ali E.
    Alam, Mahboob
    Kayani, Waleed T.
    Jia, Xiaoming
    CIRCULATION, 2023, 148
  • [3] Intravascular ultrasound-guided versus coronary angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Groenland, Frederik T. W.
    Neleman, Tara
    Kakar, Hala
    Scoccia, Alessandra
    des Plantes, Annemieke C. Ziedses
    Clephas, Pascal R. D.
    Chatterjee, Sraman
    Zhu, Mahova
    den Dekker, Wijnand K.
    Diletti, Roberto
    Zijlstra, Felix
    Mahmoud, Karim D.
    Van Mieghem, Nicolas M.
    Daemen, Joost
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 353 : 35 - 42
  • [4] Intravascular ultrasound-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and metaregression of randomized controlled trials
    Rahman, Asad
    Ahmed, Mushood
    Nadeem, Zain
    Javaid, Hira
    Jain, Hritvik
    Ahsan, Areeba
    Ahmad, Adeel
    Shahid, Farhan
    Ahmed, Raheel
    CIRCULATION, 2024, 150
  • [5] Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression of Randomized Control Trials
    Ahmed, Mushood
    Nadeem, Zain Ali
    Ahsan, Areeba
    Javaid, Hira
    Jain, Hritvik
    Shahid, Farhan
    Ahmed, Raheel
    Mamas, Mamas A.
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2025, 105 (01) : 68 - 80
  • [6] Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided versus Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Stent Thrombosis Elevation Myocardial Infarction: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Kalsi, Jasmeet
    Suffredini, John M.
    Koh, Stephanie
    Liu, Jing
    Khalid, Mirza U.
    Denktas, Ali
    Alam, Mahboob
    Kayani, Waleed
    Jia, Xiaoming
    CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 149 (03) : 196 - 204
  • [7] INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND-GUIDED VERSUS ANGIOGRAPHY-GUIDED PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTIONS IN LEFT MAIN CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Chunekamrai, Puri
    Laksomya, Thanakorn
    Potranun, Pichanun
    Anusonadisai, Kawin
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 83 (13) : 1014 - 1014
  • [8] Outcomes of Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Chronic Total Occlusions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Chugh, Yashasvi
    Buttar, Rupinder
    Kwan, Tak
    Vemmou, Evangelia
    Karacsonyi, Judit
    Nikolakopoulos, Ilia
    Garcia, Santiago
    Goessl, Mario
    Wang, Yale
    Chavez, Ivan
    Poulose, Anil
    Burke, M. Nicholas
    Brilakis, Emmanouil S.
    JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 34 (04): : E310 - +
  • [9] Intravascular Imaging-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials
    Sreenivasan, Jayakumar
    Reddy, Rohin K.
    Jamil, Yasser
    Malik, Aaqib
    Chamie, Daniel
    Howard, James P.
    Nanna, Michael G.
    Mintz, Gary S.
    Maehara, Akiko
    Ali, Ziad A.
    Moses, Jeffrey W.
    Chen, Shao-Liang
    Chieffo, Alaide
    Colombo, Antonio
    Leon, Martin B.
    Lansky, Alexandra J.
    Ahmad, Yousif
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2024, 13 (02):
  • [10] Intravascular ultrasound-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in unprotected left main coronary artery disease: A systematic review
    Mrevlje, Blaz
    McFadden, Eugene
    de la Torre Hernandez, Jose M.
    Testa, Luca
    De Maria, Giovanni Luigi
    Banning, Adrian P.
    Spitzer, Ernest
    CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2024, 59 : 99 - 108