Comparison of nematic liquid-crystal and DMD based spatial light modulation in complex photonics

被引:104
|
作者
Turtaev, Sergey [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Leite, Ivo T. [1 ,3 ]
Mitchell, Kevin J. [4 ]
Padgett, Miles J. [4 ]
Phillips, David B. [4 ,5 ]
Cizmar, Tomas [1 ,3 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dundee, Sch Sci & Engn, Dundee DD1 4HN, Scotland
[2] Univ Dundee, Sch Life Sci, Dundee DD1 4HN, Scotland
[3] Leibniz Inst Photon Technol, Albert Einstein Str 9, D-07745 Jena, Germany
[4] Glasgow Univ, Sch Phys & Astron, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Lanark, Scotland
[5] Univ Exeter, Sch Phys & Med Imaging, Stocker Rd, Exeter EX4 4QL, Devon, England
[6] Inst Sci Instruments CAS, Kralovopolska 147, Brno 61264, Czech Republic
来源
OPTICS EXPRESS | 2017年 / 25卷 / 24期
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会; 欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
WAVE-FRONT CORRECTION; FOCUSING LIGHT; MULTIMODE; TRANSMISSION; TIME; AMPLITUDE; MEDIA;
D O I
10.1364/OE.25.029874
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Digital micro-mirror devices (DMDs) have recently emerged as practical spatial light modulators (SLMs) for applications in photonics, primarily due to their modulation rates, which exceed by several orders of magnitude those of the already well-established nematic liquid crystal (LC)-based SLMs. This, however, comes at the expense of limited modulation depth and diffraction efficiency. Here we compare the beam-shaping fidelity of both technologies when applied to light control in complex environments, including an aberrated optical system, a highly scattering layer and a multimode optical fibre. We show that, despite their binary amplitude-only modulation, DMDs are capable of higher beam-shaping fidelity compared to LC-SLMs in all considered regimes. (C) 2017 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement
引用
收藏
页码:29874 / 29884
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条