Time course of meiotic spindle development in MII oocytes

被引:6
|
作者
Kilani, Suha [1 ]
Cooke, Simon [1 ]
Chapman, Michael [2 ]
机构
[1] IVF Australia, Sydney, NSW 2035, Australia
[2] Univ New S Wales, Sch Womens & Childrens Hlth, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
关键词
Human; ICSI; Meiotic spindle; Spindle retardance; Time course; MICROTUBULAR CYTOSKELETON; RETARDATION; MICROSCOPY;
D O I
10.1017/S0967199410000110
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to examine changes in meiotic spindle morphology over time to potentially optimize timing for ICSI. Using polarized light microscopy, images of MII oocytes were captured after retrieval of oocytes in stimulated cycles at six time intervals in culture: 36-36.5 h, 36.5-37.0 h, 38-38.5 h, 39-39.5 h, 40-40.5 h and 40.5-41 h post hCG. Captured images were analysed for spindle presence and their retardance. Results showed that spindles were detected in 58% (45/78) of oocytes at 36-36.5 h. This percentage rose to a peak (96% vs. 58%, p < 0.001) at 39-39.5 h and stabilized between 39-40.5 h post trigger then significantly declined at 40.5-41 h post hCG (96% vs. 77%, p < 0.001). Average spindle retardance increased from 36-36.5 h (1.8 +/- 0.7 nm) until it peaked at 39-40.5 h (3.8 +/- 0.8 nm, p < 0.0001) and then declined significantly after 40.5-41 h (3.2 +/- 0.9 nm, p = 0.0001). These results show that the meiotic spindle appearance is time dependent with the majority of oocytes having detectable spindles and highest retardance between 39-40.5 h post hCG under currently used stimulation protocol after which they start to disaggregate. 39-40.5 h post hCG may be the optimal time for ICSI.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 62
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] NICOTINAMIDE BLOCKS SPINDLE FORMATION IN ACTIVATED SPISULA OOCYTES - MEIOTIC CHROMOSOME MOVEMENT IN THE ABSENCE OF A SPINDLE
    HERLANDS, L
    PALAZZO, RE
    RUBHUN, LI
    KOIDE, SS
    BIOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1985, 169 (02): : 541 - 542
  • [32] The kinesinlike protein Subito contributes to central spindle assembly and organization of the meiotic spindle in Drosophila oocytes
    Jang, JK
    Rahman, T
    McKim, KS
    MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF THE CELL, 2005, 16 (10) : 4684 - 4694
  • [33] Mancozeb adversely affects meiotic spindle organization and fertilization in mouse oocytes
    Rossi, Gianna
    Palmerini, Maria Grazia
    Macchiarelli, Guido
    Buccione, Roberto
    Cecconi, Sandra
    REPRODUCTIVE TOXICOLOGY, 2006, 22 (01) : 51 - 55
  • [34] WHAMM is required for meiotic spindle migration and asymmetric cytokinesis in mouse oocytes
    Xin Huang
    Lu Ding
    Rui Pan
    Peng-Fei Ma
    Pan-Pan Cheng
    Chun-Hui Zhang
    Yu-Ting Shen
    Lin Xu
    Yu Liu
    Xiao-Qin He
    Zhong-Quan Qi
    Hai-Long Wang
    Histochemistry and Cell Biology, 2013, 139 : 525 - 534
  • [35] Freezing of Oocytes and Its Effect on the Displacement of the Meiotic Spindle: Short Communication
    Konc, Janos
    Kanyo, Katalin
    Kriston, Rita
    Zeke, Jozsef
    Cseh, Sandor
    SCIENTIFIC WORLD JOURNAL, 2012,
  • [36] Functionality of the spindle checkpoint during the first meiotic division of mammalian oocytes
    Brunet, S
    Pahlavan, G
    Taylor, S
    Maro, B
    REPRODUCTION, 2003, 126 (04) : 443 - 450
  • [37] Pins homolog LGN regulates meiotic spindle organization in mouse oocytes
    Xinzheng Guo
    Shaorong Gao
    Cell Research, 2009, 19 : 838 - 848
  • [38] Axin-1 Regulates Meiotic Spindle Organization in Mouse Oocytes
    He, Xiao-Qin
    Song, Yue-Qiang
    Liu, Rui
    Liu, Yu
    Zhang, Fei
    Zhang, Zhen
    Shen, Yu-Ting
    Xu, Lin
    Chen, Ming-Huang
    Wang, Ya-Long
    Xu, Bai-Hui
    Yang, Xiang-Jun
    Wang, Hai-Long
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (06):
  • [39] Combining microscopy and biochemistry to study meiotic spindle assembly in Drosophila oocytes
    Rome, Pierre
    Ohkura, Hiroyuki
    MITOSIS AND MEIOSIS, PT B, 2018, 145 : 237 - 248
  • [40] A PolScope evaluation of meiotic spindle dynamics in frozen-thawed oocytes
    Sereni, E.
    Sciajno, R.
    Fava, L.
    Coticchio, G.
    Bonu, M. A.
    Borini, A.
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2009, 19 (02) : 191 - 197