This commentary seeks to make a contribution to applied and academic debates concerning recovery from drug dependence. This involves a discussion of various commonalities relating to the places and spaces of substance use/treatment; the identification of various tensions relating to 'structure and agency' in current service provision and the way in which environmentally disparate settings may be synthesised to establish enabling environments of recovery. At the centre of this discussion is Aaron Antonovsky's (1984) model of 'salutogenesis' (and 'salutogenic environments') and how this conceptual framework may be considered and/or applied in the field of recovery from dependent substance use. Whereas public health, clinical intervention and epidemiology each attempt to identify the underlying causation of illness and ill health, salutogenesis is an agency-led concept that seeks to identify the factors and mechanisms that foster good health and the principles of 'keeping well'. It is suggested that a salutogenic approach to recovery options would draw upon the guiding principles of the framework towards advancing, individual level, recovery capital. These principles being (i) the development of social/cultural capital within socially-constructed environments; in which (ii) individual action (or agency) seeks to (iii) manage ill health; recognise the challenges underlying illness and identify the resources that are available to improve health. The author suggests that opportunities for a more 'salutogenic approach' to recovery may be noted within a grassroots model burgeoning throughout parts of the UK (and known as Recovery Cafes). This design is in stark contrast to the State's more structurally-focused treatment options that may not fully appreciate the influence of agency (and the role of place) in attempts to garner recovery capital. In order to demonstrate the academic and applied value of the proposed salutogenic framework to the issue of recovery from dependence (including the centrality of space and place in debate surrounding substance use/treatment), the author draws upon empirical research as well as theoretical and hypothetical frameworks from the discipline of sociology to illustrate throughout. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
