Effects of ACE inhibitors or β-blockers in patients treated with the fixed-dose combination of isosorbide dinitrate/hydralazine in the African-American Heart Failure Trial

被引:12
|
作者
Ghali, Jalal K.
Tam, S. William
Ferdinand, Keith C.
Lindenfeld, JoAnn
Sabolinski, Michael L.
Taylor, Anne L.
Worcel, Manuel
Curry, Charles L.
Cohn, Jay N.
机构
[1] Wayne State Univ, Univ Hlth Ctr, Detroit, MI 48201 USA
[2] NitroMed Inc, Lexington, MA USA
[3] Black Cardiologist Assoc, Atlanta, GA USA
[4] Univ Colorado, Univ Hosp, Denver, CO 80202 USA
[5] Univ Minnesota, Dept Med, Div Cardiovasc, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[6] Howard Univ, Coll Med, Washington, DC USA
关键词
D O I
10.2165/00129784-200707050-00007
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: In the A-HeFT (African-American Heart Failure Trial), treatment of African-American patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III/IV heart failure (HF) with fixed-dose combination (FDC) of isosorbide dinitrate/hydralazine (I/H) reduced mortality and morbidity and improved patient reported functional status compared with standard therapy alone. Objective: To examine the benefit of FDC I/H in subgroups based on baseline drug therapy and to investigate whether ACE inhibitors and/or angiotensin receptor antagonists (angiotensin receptor blockers) [ARBs] or beta-adrenoceptor antagonists (beta-blockers) provided additional benefit in FDC I/H-treated African-American patients with HF. Study design: The A-HeFT was a double-blind, placebo-controlled study enrolling 1050 patients stabilized on optimal HF therapies and with NYHA class III/IV HF with systolic dysfunction conducted during the years 2001-4 with up to 18 months follow-up. The primary endpoint was a composite of mortality, first HF hospitalization, and improvement of quality of life at 6 months. Secondary endpoints included mortality, hospitalizations, and change in quality of life. Prospective Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were used for differences between FDC I/H and placebo groups and retrospective analyses were conducted within FDC I/H-treated and placebo groups. Results: Subgroup analysis for mortality, event-free survival (death or first HF hospitalization), and HF hospitalization showed that FDC I/H, compared with placebo, was effective with or without ACE inhibitors or beta-blockers; or other standard medications with all-point estimates favoring the FDC I/H group. Within the placebo-treated group, beta-blockers or ACE inhibitors and/or ARBs were efficacious in improving survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.33; p < 0.0001 for beta-blocker use and HR 0.39; p = 0.01 for ACE inhibitor and/or ARB use). However, within the FDC I/H-treated group, use of beta-blockers, but not ACE inhibitors and/or ARBs, provided additional significant benefit for survival (HR 0.44; p = 0.029 and HR 0.60; p = 0.34, respectively), event-free survival (HR 0.62; p = 0.034 and HR 0.72; p = 0.29, respectively) and the composite score of death, HF hospitalization and change in quality of life (p = 0.016 and p = 0.13, respectively). Conclusion: Based on the analysis of baseline medication use in the A-HeFT, FDC I/H was superior to placebo with or without beta-blockers or ACE inhibitor. However, beta-blockers but not ACE inhibitors and/or ARBs provided additional significant benefit in African-Americans with HF treated with FDC I/H. These analyses are hypotheses generating and their confirmation in clinical trials needs to be considered.
引用
收藏
页码:373 / 380
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条