Reforming Retirement: Values and Self-Interest Drive Support for Policy Reform in Opposite Directions

被引:0
|
作者
Madland, David [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Amer Progress, Amer Worker Project, Washington, DC 20005 USA
关键词
ambivalence; American individualism; American political values; public opinion; retirement policy; self-interest; self-reliant values; WELFARE-STATE; PUBLIC-ATTITUDES; INCOME;
D O I
10.1080/08959421003621804
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学]; R592 [老年病学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100203 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Americans' attitudes about retirement policy reform are being pulled in two directions. Because of their worries about retirement security, individuals are likely to support greater government intervention. However, because of their belief in the value of self-reliance, individuals are likely to be concerned about government interventions in the economy. This paper explores the tension between self-interest and self-reliant values and examines how these factors affect attitudes about retirement policy, testing, with a unique private survey, the degree to which concern about retirement security leads self-interested Americans increasingly to support retirement policy reforms and those with self-reliant values to decrease support. The paper also attempts to tease out the conditions under which self-interest and self-reliant values exert greater or less influence on views about retirement policy. In doing so, the paper helps clarify the level of public support for retirement policy reform and indicates the types of policies likely to garner higher levels of support.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 221
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Carving Out: Isolating the True Effect of Self-Interest on Policy Attitudes
    Haselswerdt, Jake
    [J]. AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2020, 114 (04) : 1103 - 1116
  • [33] Between Solidarity and Self-Interest: The Elderly and Support for Public Education Revisited
    Busemeyer, Marius R.
    Lober, Dominik
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL POLICY, 2020, 49 (02) : 425 - 444
  • [34] Inequality, Self-Interest, and Public Support for "Robin Hood" Tax Policies
    Franko, William
    Tolbert, Caroline J.
    Witko, Christopher
    [J]. POLITICAL RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 2013, 66 (04) : 923 - 937
  • [35] Symbols, Self-Interest and Labour Policy Attitudes: Evidence from Saskatchewan
    Berdahl, Loleen
    White, Stephen
    McGrane, David
    Atkinson, Michael A.
    [J]. RELATIONS INDUSTRIELLES-INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, 2014, 69 (04): : 665 - 686
  • [36] Foreign policy in conflict. Tension between self-interest and morality
    Kindermann, GK
    [J]. INTERNATIONALE POLITIK, 1997, 52 (09): : 1 - 6
  • [37] SOCIAL-POLICY AND PROFESSIONAL SELF-INTEREST - PHYSICIAN RESPONSES TO DRGS
    NOTMAN, M
    HOWE, KR
    RITTENBERG, W
    BRIDGHAM, R
    HOLMES, MM
    ROVNER, DR
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1987, 25 (12) : 1259 - 1267
  • [38] Self-interest, partisanship, and the conditional influence of taxation on support for war in the USA
    Kriner, Douglas
    Lechase, Breanna
    Zielinski, Rosella Cappella
    [J]. CONFLICT MANAGEMENT AND PEACE SCIENCE, 2018, 35 (01) : 43 - 64
  • [39] Understanding EU Development Policy: history, global context and self-interest?
    Hurt, Stephen R.
    [J]. THIRD WORLD QUARTERLY, 2010, 31 (01) : 159 - 168
  • [40] Support for redistribution is shaped by compassion, envy, and self-interest, but not a taste for fairness
    Sznycer, Daniel
    Seal, Maria Florencia Lopez
    Sell, Aaron
    Lim, Julian
    Porat, Roni
    Shalvi, Shaul
    Halperin, Eran
    Cosmides, Leda
    Tooby, John
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2017, 114 (31) : 8420 - 8425