Multivariate Meta-Analysis of Heterogeneous Studies Using Only Summary Statistics: Efficiency and Robustness

被引:59
|
作者
Liu, Dungang [1 ]
Liu, Regina Y. [2 ]
Xie, Minge [2 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, New Haven, CT 06511 USA
[2] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Stat & Biostat, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Combining information; Complex evidence synthesis; Confidence distribution; Generalized estimating equations; Indirect evidence; Individual participant data; INDIVIDUAL PATIENT DATA; FREQUENTIST DISTRIBUTION ESTIMATOR; GENERALIZED FIDUCIAL-INFERENCE; CONFIDENCE DISTRIBUTION; EPIDEMIOLOGY; INHIBITORS; REGRESSION; PARAMETER; FRAMEWORK; MODELS;
D O I
10.1080/01621459.2014.899235
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
Meta-analysis has been widely used to synthesize evidence from multiple studies for common hypotheses or parameters of interest. However, it has not yet been fully developed for incorporating heterogeneous studies, which arise often in applications due to different study designs, populations, or outcomes. For heterogeneous studies, the parameter of interest may not be estimable for certain studies, and in such a case, these studies are typically excluded from conventional meta-analysis. The exclusion of part of the studies can lead to a nonnegligible loss of information. This article introduces a meta-analysis for heterogeneous studies by combining the confidence density functions derived from the summary statistics of individual studies, hence referred to as the CD approach. It includes all the studies in the analysis and makes use of all information, direct as well as indirect. Under a general likelihood inference framework, this new approach is shown to have several desirable properties, including: (i) it is asymptotically as efficient as the maximum likelihood approach using individual participant data (IPD) from all studies; (ii) unlike the IPD analysis, it suffices to use summary statistics to carry out the CD approach. Individual-level data are not required; and (iii) it is robust against misspecification of the working covariance structure of parameter estimates. Besides its own theoretical significance, the last property also substantially broadens the applicability of the CD approach. All the properties of the CD approach are further confirmed by data simulated from a randomized clinical trials setting as well as by real data on aircraft landing performance. Overall, one obtains a unifying approach for combining summary statistics, subsuming many of the existing meta-analysis methods as special cases.
引用
收藏
页码:326 / 340
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multivariate Bayesian meta-analysis: joint modelling of multiple cancer types using summary statistics
    Jahan, Farzana
    Duncan, Earl W.
    Cramb, Susana M.
    Baade, Peter D.
    Mengersen, Kerrie L.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH GEOGRAPHICS, 2020, 19 (01)
  • [2] Multivariate Bayesian meta-analysis: joint modelling of multiple cancer types using summary statistics
    Farzana Jahan
    Earl W. Duncan
    Susana M. Cramb
    Peter D. Baade
    Kerrie L. Mengersen
    [J]. International Journal of Health Geographics, 19
  • [3] metaCCA: Summary statistics-based multivariate meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies using canonical correlation analysis
    Cichonska, Anna
    Rousu, Juho
    Marttinen, Pekka
    Kangas, Antti J.
    Soininen, Pasi
    Lehtimaki, Terho
    Raitakari, Olli
    Jarvelin, Marjo-Riitta
    Salomaa, Veikko
    Ala-Korpela, Mika
    Ripatti, Samuli
    Pirinen, Matti
    [J]. GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2015, 39 (07) : 540 - 540
  • [4] metaCCA: summary statistics-based multivariate meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies using canonical correlation analysis
    Cichonska, Anna
    Rousu, Juho
    Marttinen, Pekka
    Kangas, Antti J.
    Soininen, Pasi
    Lehtimaki, Terho
    Raitakari, Olli T.
    Jarvelin, Marjo-Riitta
    Salomaa, Veikko
    Ala-Korpela, Mika
    Ripatti, Samuli
    Pirinen, Matti
    [J]. BIOINFORMATICS, 2016, 32 (13) : 1981 - 1989
  • [5] On the relative efficiency of using summary statistics versus individual-level data in meta-analysis
    Lin, D. Y.
    Zeng, D.
    [J]. BIOMETRIKA, 2010, 97 (02) : 321 - 332
  • [6] Simpson's Paradox in Meta-Analysis - Choice of Studies and Summary Statistics
    Chan, Jeffrey Shi Kai
    Harky, Amer
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 127 : 200 - 200
  • [7] Methods for meta-analysis of multiple traits using GWAS summary statistics
    Ray, Debashree
    Boehnke, Michael
    [J]. GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2018, 42 (02) : 134 - 145
  • [8] Meta-analysis under imbalance in measurement of confounders in cohort studies using only summary-level data
    Ray, Debashree
    Munoz, Alvaro
    Zhang, Mingyu
    Li, Xiuhong
    Chatterjee, Nilanjan
    Jacobson, Lisa P.
    Lau, Bryan
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [9] Meta-analysis under imbalance in measurement of confounders in cohort studies using only summary-level data
    Debashree Ray
    Alvaro Muñoz
    Mingyu Zhang
    Xiuhong Li
    Nilanjan Chatterjee
    Lisa P. Jacobson
    Bryan Lau
    [J]. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 22
  • [10] Re-analysis and meta-analysis of summary statistics from gene-environment interaction studies
    Pham, Duy T.
    Westerman, Kenneth E.
    Pan, Cong
    Chen, Ling
    Srinivasan, Shylaja
    Isganaitis, Elvira
    Vajravelu, Mary Ellen
    Bacha, Fida
    Chernausek, Steve
    Gubitosi-Klug, Rose
    Divers, Jasmin
    Pihoker, Catherine
    Marcovina, Santica M.
    Manning, Alisa K.
    Chen, Han
    [J]. BIOINFORMATICS, 2023, 39 (12)