Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Caregiver Reaction Assessment

被引：28

作者：

Ge, Cuixia ^{[1
]}

Yang, Xiaoshi ^{[1
]}

Fu, Jialiang ^{[1
]}

Chang, Ying ^{[1
]}

Wei, Jiansi ^{[1
]}

Zhang, Fengjiao ^{[1
]}

Nutifafa, Attah Ellis ^{[1
]}

Wang, Lie ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] China Med Univ, Dept Social Med, Coll Publ Hlth, Shenyang 110001, Peoples R China

来源：

PSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCES | 2011年 / 65卷 / 03期

关键词：

Caregiver Reaction Assessment; China; family caregivers; reliability; validity; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; CANCER-PATIENTS; FAMILY CAREGIVERS; BURDEN; PREDICTORS;

D O I：

10.1111/j.1440-1819.2011.02200.x

中图分类号：

R74 [神经病学与精神病学];

学科分类号：

摘要：

Aims: The aim of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Caregiver Reaction Assessment, as part of a psychosocial study among family caregivers of cancer patients. Methods: Participants were derived from the Second Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University in Shenyang, China. The research established the internal consistent reliability, test-retest reliability and construct validity. Results: The research comprised 400 family caregivers. The Chinese version of the Caregiver Reaction Assessment showed adequate internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability and appropriate construct validity. After adjusting items 4, 8, 15 and 18, confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the five new factors of the Chinese version of the Caregiver Reaction Assessment had goodness of fit. Conclusions: These findings suggest that the Chinese version of the Caregiver Reaction Assessment is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring specific aspects of the caregiving experience in the Chinese population.

引用

页码：254 / 263

页数：10

共 50 条

[21] RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE CAREGIVER FUNCTIONAL USE SURVEY
Yildiz, Ayse
Yildiz, Ramazan
Erol, Erkan
Apaydin, Umut
Gokmen, Derya
Elbasan, Bulent
TURKISH JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY REHABILITATION-TURK FIZYOTERAPI VE REHABILITASYON DERGISI, 2021, 32 (01): : 81 - 88
[22] Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Zarit Caregiver Burden Interview
Ari, Y
Kudo, K
Hosokawa, T
Washio, M
Miura, H
Hisamichi, S
PSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCES, 1997, 51 (05) : 281 - 287
[23] Validity and Reliability of the Spanish Version of Caregiver Abuse Screen (CASE)
Perez-Rojo, Gema
Nuevo, Roberto
Sancho, Mayte
Penhale, Bridget
RESEARCH ON AGING, 2015, 37 (01) : 63 - 81
[24] Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Worry Scale
Shiu, ATY
Wong, RYM
PUBLIC HEALTH NURSING, 2004, 21 (03) : 257 - 265
[25] Caregiver burden in cerebral palsy: Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of caregiver difficulties scale
Atar, Emel
Dilekci, Erdal
Unubol, Tugba Ozsoy
Gunduz, Nermin
Atar, Murat
Askin, Ayhan
CHILD CARE HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 48 (03) : 465 - 473
[26] Validity and reliability of Chinese version of the new diabetic foot ulcer assessment scale
Luo, YiXin
Mai, LiFang
Liu, XingZhou
Yang, Chuan
INTERNATIONAL WOUND JOURNAL, 2023, 20 (09) : 3724 - 3730
[27] The study of the validity and reliability of the Occupational Self-Assessment-traditional Chinese version
Pan, Ay-Woan
Chung, LyInn
Chen, Tsyr-Jang
Hsiung, Ping-Chuan
HONG KONG JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2020, 33 (01) : 18 - 24
[28] A Chinese version of Iowa Infant Feeding Attitude Scale: Reliability and validity assessment
Ho, Yen-Ju
McGrath, Jacqueline M.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2011, 48 (04) : 475 - 478
[29] A Chinese version of the revised nurses professional values scale: Reliability and validity assessment
Lin, Yu-Hua
Wang, Liching Sung
NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2010, 30 (06) : 492 - 498
[30] Validity and Reliability of the New Chinese Version of the Frontal Assessment Battery-Phonemic
Li, Xudong
Shen, Miaoxin
Jin, Yi
Jia, Shuhong
Zhou, Zhi
Han, Ziling
Zhang, Xiangfei
Tong, Xiaopeng
Jiao, Jinsong
JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE, 2021, 80 (01) : 371 - 381

← 1 2 3 4 5 →