Assessing a set of optimal user interface parameters for intensity-modulated proton therapy planning

被引:13
|
作者
Hillbrand, Martin [1 ]
Georg, Dietmar [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Radiotherapy, Div Med Radiat Phys, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
来源
关键词
proton beam planning; planning parameter; dose matrix resolution; TREATMENT UNCERTAINTIES; RANGE UNCERTAINTIES; SENSITIVITY; OPTIMIZATION; RADIOTHERAPY; PLANS;
D O I
10.1120/jacmp.v11i4.3219
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The purpose was to identify an optimal set of treatment planning parameters and a minimal necessary dose matrix resolution for treatment planning with spot-scanned protons. Treatment plans based on different combinations of planning parameters and dose grid resolutions (DG) were calculated in a homogeneous geometric phantom for three cubic targets of different size: 8, 64 and 244 cm(3). The proton dose was delivered by one single beam. Treatment plans were compared in terms of dose profiles parallel to and perpendicular to the central beam axis, as well as by dose homogeneity and conformity measures. Irrespective of target size, the dose homogeneity and conformity were comparable if the distance between spot layers was in the order of the width of a single Bragg peak, and the lateral distance between spots did not exceed two times the spot sigma. If the distance between spot layers was considerably larger than the width of the Bragg peak, the homogeneity index increased. For the small target, this index escalated from values around 5% to 12% in extreme, and to more than 20% for the two larger targets. Furthermore, the width of the 95% isodose increased. Similar results were found for the variation of the parameter determining the lateral spacing between proton dose spots. The average difference of dose profiles with respect to the profile for a DG of 1 mm was below 3% for all considered settings up to a DG of 6 mm. However, a DG of less than 2-3 mm is required to keep the maximum deviation below this limit. The tests performed in this study are necessary to prevent systematic errors from spot-scanning proton therapy planning. A separation of dose spots in the dimensions of the Bragg peak in the longitudinal direction and no more than two times the spot sigma in the lateral direction were found to be adequate for IMPT treatment planning in a homogeneous phantom. A DG of 2-3 mm is necessary to accurately resolve the steep dose gradients of proton beams.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 104
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] High Fidelity Robust Optimization for Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy
    Gu, W.
    Ruan, D.
    Zou, J.
    Dong, L.
    Sheng, K.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (06) : E641 - E641
  • [32] Reflections on beam configuration optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy
    Cao, Wenhua
    Rocha, Humberto
    Mohan, Radhe
    Lim, Gino
    Goudarzi, Hadis M.
    Ferreira, Brigida C.
    Dias, Joana M.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2022, 67 (13):
  • [33] Biological Based Robust Optimization for Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy
    Bai, X.
    Lim, G.
    Grosshans, D.
    Mohan, R.
    Cao, W.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (06) : E643 - E643
  • [34] Adaptive method for multicriteria optimization of intensity-modulated proton therapy
    Kamal-Sayed, Hisham
    Ma, J.
    Tseung, H.
    Abdel-Rehim, A.
    Herman, M. G.
    Beltran, C. J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (12) : 5643 - 5652
  • [35] The rationale for intensity-modulated proton therapy in geometrically challenging cases
    Safai, S.
    Trofimov, A.
    Adams, J. A.
    Engelsman, M.
    Bortfeld, T.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2013, 58 (18): : 6337 - 6353
  • [36] Robust beam orientation optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy
    Gu, Wenbo
    Neph, Ryan
    Ruan, Dan
    Zou, Wei
    Dong, Lei
    Sheng, Ke
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (08) : 3356 - 3370
  • [37] Knowledge-based intensity-modulated proton planning for gastroesophageal carcinoma
    Celik, Eren
    Baues, Christian
    Claus, Karina
    Fogliata, Antonella
    Scorsetti, Marta
    Marnitz, Simone
    Cozzi, Luca
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2021, 60 (03) : 285 - 292
  • [38] Proton therapy reduces gastrostomy-tube dependence in a comparative effectiveness analysis of intensity-modulated proton therapy vs intensity-modulated radiotherapy for oropharyngeal carcinoma
    Marqueen, Kathryn
    Garden, Adam
    Swanson, David
    Ning, Matthew
    Rosenthal, David
    Gunn, G.
    Fuller, C.
    Phan, Jack
    Spiotto, Michael
    Lee, Anna
    Moreno, Amy
    Chronowsk, Gregory
    Reddy, Jay
    Mayo, Lauren
    Shah, Shalin
    Gross, Neal
    Ferrarotto, Renata
    Hutcheson, Katherine
    Toumazis, Iakovos
    Frank, Steven
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2024, 47 (10): : S17 - S18
  • [39] Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) versus intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for the treatment of head and neck cancer: A dosimetric comparison
    Nguyen, My-Lien
    Cantrell, J. Nathan
    Ahmad, Salahuddin
    Henson, Christina
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2021, 46 (03) : 259 - 263
  • [40] Comparing Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy With Intensity-Modulated Photon Therapy for Oropharyngeal Cancer: The Journey From Clinical Trial Concept to Activation
    Frank, Steven J.
    Blanchard, Pierre
    Lee, J. Jack
    Sturgis, Erich M.
    Kies, Merrill S.
    Machtay, Mitchell
    Vikram, Bhadrasain
    Garden, Adam S.
    Rosenthal, David I.
    Gunn, G. Brandon
    Fuller, C. David
    Hutcheson, Katherine
    Lai, Stephen
    Busse, Paul M.
    Lee, Nancy Y.
    Lin, Alexander
    Foote, Robert L.
    SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2018, 28 (02) : 108 - 113