Assessing a set of optimal user interface parameters for intensity-modulated proton therapy planning

被引:13
|
作者
Hillbrand, Martin [1 ]
Georg, Dietmar [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Radiotherapy, Div Med Radiat Phys, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
来源
关键词
proton beam planning; planning parameter; dose matrix resolution; TREATMENT UNCERTAINTIES; RANGE UNCERTAINTIES; SENSITIVITY; OPTIMIZATION; RADIOTHERAPY; PLANS;
D O I
10.1120/jacmp.v11i4.3219
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The purpose was to identify an optimal set of treatment planning parameters and a minimal necessary dose matrix resolution for treatment planning with spot-scanned protons. Treatment plans based on different combinations of planning parameters and dose grid resolutions (DG) were calculated in a homogeneous geometric phantom for three cubic targets of different size: 8, 64 and 244 cm(3). The proton dose was delivered by one single beam. Treatment plans were compared in terms of dose profiles parallel to and perpendicular to the central beam axis, as well as by dose homogeneity and conformity measures. Irrespective of target size, the dose homogeneity and conformity were comparable if the distance between spot layers was in the order of the width of a single Bragg peak, and the lateral distance between spots did not exceed two times the spot sigma. If the distance between spot layers was considerably larger than the width of the Bragg peak, the homogeneity index increased. For the small target, this index escalated from values around 5% to 12% in extreme, and to more than 20% for the two larger targets. Furthermore, the width of the 95% isodose increased. Similar results were found for the variation of the parameter determining the lateral spacing between proton dose spots. The average difference of dose profiles with respect to the profile for a DG of 1 mm was below 3% for all considered settings up to a DG of 6 mm. However, a DG of less than 2-3 mm is required to keep the maximum deviation below this limit. The tests performed in this study are necessary to prevent systematic errors from spot-scanning proton therapy planning. A separation of dose spots in the dimensions of the Bragg peak in the longitudinal direction and no more than two times the spot sigma in the lateral direction were found to be adequate for IMPT treatment planning in a homogeneous phantom. A DG of 2-3 mm is necessary to accurately resolve the steep dose gradients of proton beams.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 104
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of intensity-modulated proton therapy and intensity-modulated photon therapy in treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Taheri-Kadkhoda, Z.
    Nill, S.
    Wilkens, J.
    Oelfke, U.
    Bjoerk-Eriksson, T.
    Huber, P.
    Munter, M. W.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2007, 82 : S52 - S53
  • [2] Analytical models for probabilistic inverse treatment planning in intensity-modulated proton therapy
    Wahl, N.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2019, 195 : S205 - S205
  • [3] Analytical models for probabilistic inverse treatment planning in intensity-modulated proton therapy
    Wahl, N.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2019, 195 : S187 - S187
  • [4] A Pilot Study on the Comparison between Planning Target Volume-based Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy Plans and Robustly Optimized Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy Plans
    Perumal, Bojarajan
    Sundaresan, Harikrishna Etti
    Vaitheeswaran, Ranganathan
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 43 (03) : 179 - 184
  • [5] Proton Therapy for Nasopharyngeal Cancer: A Matched Case-control Study of Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy and Intensity-Modulated Photon Therapy
    Li, X.
    Lee, A.
    Lee, N.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2020, 106 (05): : 1138 - 1139
  • [6] Planning and delivery of intensity-modulated radiation therapy
    Yu, Cedric X.
    Amies, Christopher J.
    Svatos, Michelle
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (12) : 5233 - 5241
  • [7] Proton energy optimization and reduction for intensity-modulated proton therapy
    Cao, Wenhua
    Lim, Gino
    Liao, Li
    Li, Yupeng
    Jiang, Shengpeng
    Li, Xiaoqiang
    Li, Heng
    Suzuki, Kazumichi
    Zhu, X. Ronald
    Gomez, Daniel
    Zhang, Xiaodong
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2014, 59 (21): : 6341 - 6354
  • [8] Optimization of beam parameters and treatment planning for intensity modulated proton therapy
    Trofimov, A
    Bortfeld, T
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2003, 2 (05) : 437 - 444
  • [9] Hematologic Toxicity Comparison of Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy and Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy in Anal Cancer Patients
    Nelson, B.
    Tadesse, D.
    Wang, K.
    Meier, T.
    Mascia, A. E.
    Kharofa, J. R., Jr.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2021, 111 (03): : E64 - E65
  • [10] Effectiveness of robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy planning for head and neck cancers
    Liu, Wei
    Frank, Steven J.
    Li, Xiaoqiang
    Li, Yupeng
    Park, Peter C.
    Dong, Lei
    Zhu, X. Ronald
    Mohan, Radhe
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (05)