Aerodynamic study of three cars in tandem using computational fluid dynamics

被引:3
|
作者
Abdul-Rahman, H. [1 ]
Moria, H. [2 ]
Rasani, M. R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kebangsaan Malaysia, Dept Mech & Mfg Engn, Fac Engn & Built Environm, Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia
[2] Yanbu Ind Coll, Deparlment Mech Engn Technol, Yanbu Al Sinaiyah City 41912, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Computational fluid; dynamics (CFD); platoon; aerodynamic force; drag coefficient; TURBULENT-FLOW; AHMED BODY; VEHICLES; PLATOON;
D O I
10.15282/jmes.15.3.2021.02.0646
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Aerodynamics of vehicles account for nearly 80% of fuel losses on the road. Today, the use of the Intelligent Transport System (ITS) allows vehicles to be guided at a distance close to each other and has been shown to help reduce the drag coefficients of the vehicles involved. In this article, the aim is to investigate the effect of distances between a three car platoons, to their drag and lift coefficients, using computational fluid dynamics. To that end, a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation was first performed on a single case and platoon of two Ahmed car models using the STAR-CCM+ software, for validation with previous experimental studies. Significant drop in drag coefficients were observed on platoon models compared to a single model. Comparison between the k-ro and k-E turbulence models for a two car platoon found that the k-ro model more closely approximate the experimental results with errors of only 8.66% compared to 21.14% by k-c turbulence model. Further studies were undertaken to study the effects of various car gaps (0.5L, 1.0L and 1.5L; L = length of the car) to the aerodynamics of a three -car platoon using CFD simulation. Simulation results show that the lowest drag coefficient that impacts on vehicle fuel savings varies depending on the car's position. For the front car, the lowest drag coefficient (CD) can be seen for car gaps corresponding to Xi = 0.5L and X2 = 0.5L, where Co = 0.1217, while its lift coefficient (CO was 0.0366 (X, and X2 denoting first to second and second to third car distance respectively). For the middle car, the lowest drag coefficient occurred when Xi = 1.5L and X2 = 0.5L, which is 0.1397. The lift coefficient for this car was -0.0611. Meanwhile, for the last car, the lowest drag coefficient was observed when Xi = 0.5L and X2 = 1.5L, i.e. Co = 0.263. The lift coefficient for this car was 0.0452. In this study, the lowest drag coefficient yields the lowest lift coefficient. The study also found that for even Xi and X2 spacings, the drag coefficient increased steadily from the front to the last car, while the use of different spacings were found to decrease drag coefficient of the rear car compared to the front car and had a positive impact on platoon driving and fuel -saving.
引用
收藏
页码:8228 / 8240
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Study of aerodynamic performances of different wind tunnel configurations and air inlet velocities, using computational fluid dynamics (CFD)
    di Perta, Ester Scotto
    Agizza, Maria Angela
    Sorrentino, Giancarlo
    Boccia, Lorenzo
    Pindozzi, Stefania
    COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2016, 125 : 137 - 148
  • [42] Aerodynamic design optimization of an aircraft wing for drag reduction using computational fluid dynamics approach
    Kumar, M. R. Shiva
    Srinath, R.
    Vigneshwar, K.
    Kumar, Ravi B.
    WIND AND STRUCTURES, 2020, 31 (01) : 15 - 20
  • [44] Aerodynamic shape optimization of a near-sonic passenger plane using computational fluid dynamics
    Watanabe, T.
    Matsushima, K.
    Nakahashi, K.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART G-JOURNAL OF AEROSPACE ENGINEERING, 2008, 222 (G7) : 1025 - 1035
  • [45] Aerodynamic Investigation of a Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine with Split Winglet Using Computational Fluid Dynamics
    Sy, Miguel Sumait
    Abuan, Binoe Eugenio
    Danao, Louis Angelo Macapili
    ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (18)
  • [46] Efficient Computation of Unsteady Aerodynamic Loads Using Computational-Fluid-Dynamics Linearized Methods
    Fleischer, Dietmar
    Breitsamter, Christian
    JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2013, 50 (02): : 425 - 440
  • [47] Reduced order unsteady aerodynamic modeling for stability and control analysis using computational fluid dynamics
    Ghoreyshi, Mehdi
    Jirasek, Adam
    Cummings, Russell M.
    PROGRESS IN AEROSPACE SCIENCES, 2014, 71 : 167 - 217
  • [48] Aerodynamic impact of total inferior turbinectomy versus inferior turbinoplasty a computational fluid dynamics study
    Siu, Joey
    Inthavong, Kiao
    Shang, Yidan
    Vahaji, Sara
    Douglas, Richard George
    RHINOLOGY, 2020, 58 (04) : 349 - 359
  • [49] Three decades of accomplishments in computational fluid dynamics
    Shang, JS
    PROGRESS IN AEROSPACE SCIENCES, 2004, 40 (03) : 173 - 197
  • [50] Aerodynamic effects of inferior turbinate reduction - Computational fluid dynamics simulation
    Wexler, D
    Segal, R
    Kimbell, J
    ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2005, 131 (12) : 1102 - 1107