Explicit methods for attribute weighting in multi-attribute decision-making: a review study

被引:23
|
作者
Pena, Julio [1 ]
Napoles, Gonzalo [2 ]
Salgueiro, Yamisleydi [3 ]
机构
[1] Cent Univ Las Villas, Ctr Studies Computat Mech & Numer Methods Engn, Santa Clara, Cuba
[2] Univ Hasselt, Fac Business Econ, Hasselt, Belgium
[3] Univ Talca, Dept Comp Sci, Talca, Chile
关键词
Attribute weighting; Decision making; Multiple attribute decision making; Explicit weighting methods; EVIDENTIAL REASONING APPROACH; OBJECTIVE WEIGHTS; POINT ALLOCATION; CRITERIA; ENTROPY; MODELS; INFORMATION; TOPSIS; ELICITATION;
D O I
10.1007/s10462-019-09757-w
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Attribute weighting is a key aspect when modeling multi-attribute decision analysis problems. Despite the large number of proposals reported in the literature, reaching a consensus on the most convenient method for a certain scenario is difficult, if not impossible. As a first contribution of this paper, we propose a categorization of existing methodologies, which goes beyond the current taxonomy (subjective, objective, hybrid). As a second contribution, supported by the new categorization, we survey and critically discuss the explicit weighting methods (which are closely related to the subjective ones). The critical discussion allows evaluating how much a solution can deviate from the expected one if no foresight is taken. As a final contribution, we summarize the main drawbacks from a global perspective and propose some insights to correct them. Such a discussion attempts to improve the reliability of decision support systems involving human experts.
引用
收藏
页码:3127 / 3152
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Explicit methods for attribute weighting in multi-attribute decision-making: a review study
    Julio Pena
    Gonzalo Nápoles
    Yamisleydi Salgueiro
    [J]. Artificial Intelligence Review, 2020, 53 : 3127 - 3152
  • [2] Implicit and hybrid methods for attribute weighting in multi-attribute decision-making: a review study
    Julio Pena
    Gonzalo Nápoles
    Yamisleydi Salgueiro
    [J]. Artificial Intelligence Review, 2021, 54 : 3817 - 3847
  • [3] Implicit and hybrid methods for attribute weighting in multi-attribute decision-making: a review study
    Pena, Julio
    Napoles, Gonzalo
    Salgueiro, Yamisleydi
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REVIEW, 2021, 54 (05) : 3817 - 3847
  • [4] Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Methods as a Part of Mathematical Optimization
    Vinogradova, Irina
    [J]. MATHEMATICS, 2019, 7 (10)
  • [5] Application of multi-attribute decision-making methods for the selection of conveyor
    Fulzele, S. B.
    Khatke, S. B.
    Kadam, S. J.
    Kamble, A. G.
    [J]. SOFT COMPUTING, 2022, 26 (19) : 9873 - 9881
  • [6] Application of multi-attribute decision-making methods for the selection of conveyor
    S. B. Fulzele
    S. B. Khatke
    S. J. Kadam
    A. G. Kamble
    [J]. Soft Computing, 2022, 26 : 9873 - 9881
  • [7] PROXY APPROACH TO MULTI-ATTRIBUTE DECISION-MAKING
    OPPENHEIMER, KR
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1978, 24 (06) : 675 - 689
  • [8] Research on Hybrid Multi-attribute Decision-Making
    Sun, Guidong
    Guan, Xin
    [J]. 2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CYBER-ENABLED DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING AND KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY PROCEEDINGS - CYBERC 2016, 2016, : 272 - 277
  • [9] Multi-attribute decision-making in design choice
    Bedford, T
    [J]. PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT (PSAM 4), VOLS 1-4, 1998, : 2391 - 2396
  • [10] Probability numbers for multi-attribute decision-making
    Weng, Shizhou
    Huang, Zhengwei
    Lv, Yuejin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2024, 46 (03) : 6109 - 6132