Applicability of frequency-domain and time-domain electromagnetic methods for mountain permafrost studies

被引:48
|
作者
Hauck, C [1 ]
Guglielmin, M
Isaksen, K
Vonder Mühll, D
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Hydraul Hydrol & Glaciol Lab, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Roma Tre, Dept Geol, Rome, Italy
[3] Univ Oslo, Dept Phys Geog, Oslo, Norway
关键词
electromagnetic methods; geophysics; mountain permafrost; PACE;
D O I
10.1002/ppp.383
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
The electromagnetic instruments EM-31, GEM-300 and PROTEM have been tested at various field sites during the PACE (Permafrost and Climate in Europe) project. In this paper the applicability of the different methods for permafrost studies in mountainous regions is evaluated and the results are compared with borehole data. The EM-31 proved highly effective for mapping shallow permafrost and for active layer studies in various permafrost environments. The localities around each of the PACE boreholes were investigated for near-surface heterogeneities. Results are presented as relative conductivity variations along the survey lines. Sensitivity studies concerning snow cover and instrument drift were also performed. The multi-frequency instrument GEM-300 was compared with the EM-31 and showed good agreement for similar induction numbers (the relation between transmitter-receiver spacing, frequency and conductivity). However, care must be taken in choosing the appropriate frequency in GEM-300 surveys, as the instrument response depends on the frequency as well as the ground resistivity. For high-resistivity materials (e.g. rock glaciers with a high ice content), high frequencies (19,975 Hz with the GEM-300 or the single-frequency 9800 Hz for the EM-31) are appropriate. In relatively low-resistive material, resistivity variations with depth may lead to different responses for different frequencies. The time-domain system PROTEM was used to determine permafrost depths. The exploration depth ranged between 100 and 300 m, depending on the upper layer resistivity. The results were especially encouraging for sites with a large contrast between the resistivity of the frozen and unfrozen layers (e.g. rock glaciers). Estimated permafrost thicknesses are in good agreement with borehole data. Copyright (C) 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 52
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Fluorescence lifetime imaging for the two-photon microscope: time-domain and frequency-domain methods
    Gratton, E
    Breusegem, S
    Sutin, J
    Ruan, QQ
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS, 2003, 8 (03) : 381 - 390
  • [42] HIGH-FREQUENCY SIMULATOR COMBINES TIME-DOMAIN AND FREQUENCY-DOMAIN TECHNOLOGIES
    LIPMAN, J
    EDN, 1995, 40 (18) : 26 - 26
  • [43] REMOVAL OF THE HOST ROCK RESPONSE FROM TIME-DOMAIN ELECTROMAGNETIC DATA BY TRANSFORMING TO AND FILTERING IN THE FREQUENCY-DOMAIN
    BOTHA, WJ
    SLEE, JC
    STETTLER, E
    GEOPHYSICS, 1987, 52 (03) : 398 - 399
  • [44] COMPARISON OF TIME-DOMAIN AND FREQUENCY-DOMAIN MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES IN ANTENNA THEORY
    YOUNG, JD
    SVOBODA, DE
    BURNSIDE, WD
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION, 1973, AP21 (04) : 581 - 583
  • [45] Fast Synchrophasor Estimation by Means of Frequency-Domain and Time-Domain Algorithms
    Belega, Daniel
    Macii, David
    Petri, Dario
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT, 2014, 63 (02) : 388 - 401
  • [46] Comparison of Time-Domain and Frequency-Domain Contact Resonant Ultrasound Spectroscopy
    Hernandez-Becerra, P. A. I.
    Balleza-Ordaz, M.
    Vargas-Luna, M.
    Delgadillo-Holtfort, I.
    INSTRUMENTS AND EXPERIMENTAL TECHNIQUES, 2019, 62 (02) : 241 - 246
  • [47] Comparison of Time-Domain and Frequency-Domain Contact Resonant Ultrasound Spectroscopy
    P. A. I. Hernández-Becerra
    M. Balleza-Ordaz
    M. Vargas-Luna
    I. Delgadillo-Holtfort
    Instruments and Experimental Techniques, 2019, 62 : 241 - 246
  • [48] Design PID controllers for desired time-domain or frequency-domain response
    Zhang, WD
    Xi, YG
    Yang, GK
    Xu, XM
    ISA TRANSACTIONS, 2002, 41 (04) : 511 - 520
  • [49] Direct connection between time-domain performance and frequency-domain characteristics
    Franchek, MA
    Herman, PA
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROBUST AND NONLINEAR CONTROL, 1998, 8 (12) : 1021 - 1042
  • [50] Comparison between a time-domain and a frequency-domain system for optical tomography
    Nissila, Ilkka
    Lipiainen, Lauri
    Hebden, Jeremy C.
    Katila, Toivo
    Jennions, David
    Heino, Jenni
    Schweiger, Martin
    Kotilahti, Kalle
    Noponen, Tommi
    Gibson, Adam
    Jarvenpaa, Seppo
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS, 2006, 11 (06)