Large group decision-making incorporating decision risk and risk attitude: A statistical approach

被引:26
|
作者
Zhong, Xiangyu [1 ]
Xu, Xuanhua [1 ]
Chen, Xiaohong [1 ]
Goh, Mark [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Sch Business, Changsha 410083, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Univ Singapore, NUS Business Sch, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Natl Univ Singapore, Logist Inst Asia Pacific, Singapore, Singapore
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Statistics; Large group decision-making; Decision risk; Risk attitude; CONSENSUS-BASED MODEL; FUZZY INFORMATION; WEIGHTS; MAKERS; MECHANISM;
D O I
10.1016/j.ins.2020.04.003
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In this study, we propose a statistical method incorporating decision risk and risk attitude into large group decision-making. The decision-making groups are divided into subgroups based on their attitudes to risk, and the evaluation information for the decision-makers within the same subgroup is combined to form the sample dataset. Next, the internal decision risk levels of all subgroups are measured using sample standard deviations and reduced through a feedback mechanism. Significance testing is used to determine the criterion weights and to measure the external decision risk levels of subgroups. The internal and external decision risk levels are then combined to yield the subgroup weights. Confidence interval is used to transform the sample data into interval numbers, which are then aggregated and analyzed to yield the decision-making results. Meanwhile, risk attitudes are taken into account throughout the decision-making process by various means. A case study and comparison analyses, along with sensitivity analyses, are used to illustrate the feasibility and rationality of the proposed method. Our experiments suggest that decision risk and risk attitude matter in large group decision-making. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:120 / 137
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Decision Support Approach for Group Decision Making under Risk and Uncertainty
    Li, Jiawei
    Kendall, Graham
    Pollard, Simon
    Soane, Emma
    Davies, Gareth
    Bai, Ruibin
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2010 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LOGISTICS SYSTEMS AND INTELLIGENT MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1-3, 2010, : 1856 - +
  • [22] GROUP RISK-TAKING, GROUP POLARIZATION AND GROUP DECISION-MAKING
    FRASER, C
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE BRITISH PSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1972, 25 (87): : 143 - 144
  • [23] A Quantitative Risk Assessment Approach Based on VPRS and Group Decision-making Theory
    Cheng, Xiaorong
    Geng, Xin
    Wei, Yan
    [J]. 2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND COMPUTER SCIENCE, VOL 1, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 456 - 459
  • [24] A Three-Way Group Decision-Making Approach Based on Mixture Risk
    Yu, Zhihang
    Zhang, Libo
    Li, Wentao
    Liu, Jiubing
    [J]. COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK AND SOCIAL COMPUTING, CHINESECSCW 2021, PT I, 2022, 1491 : 124 - 132
  • [25] DECISION-MAKING IN THE PRESENCE OF RISK
    MACHINA, MJ
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1987, 236 (4801) : 537 - 543
  • [26] GENETIC RISK AND DECISION-MAKING
    EVERSKIEBOOMS, G
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 27 (3-4) : 171 - 171
  • [27] QUANTIFICATION OF RISK AND DECISION-MAKING
    TURNER, P
    [J]. HUMAN TOXICOLOGY, 1986, 5 (06): : 398 - 399
  • [28] THE AGENDA FOR RISK DECISION-MAKING
    LOWRANCE, WW
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT, 1983, 25 (10): : 4 - 8
  • [29] Principles of risk decision-making
    Krewski, Daniel
    Saunders-Hastings, Patrick
    Larkin, Patricia
    Westphal, Margit
    Tyshenko, Michael G.
    Leiss, William
    Dusseault, Maurice
    Jerrett, Michael
    Coyle, Doug
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH-PART B-CRITICAL REVIEWS, 2022, 25 (05): : 250 - 278
  • [30] Precautionary risk decision-making
    Rosqvist, T
    Tuominen, R
    [J]. PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, VOL 1- 6, 2004, : 567 - 572