Large group decision-making incorporating decision risk and risk attitude: A statistical approach

被引:26
|
作者
Zhong, Xiangyu [1 ]
Xu, Xuanhua [1 ]
Chen, Xiaohong [1 ]
Goh, Mark [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Sch Business, Changsha 410083, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Univ Singapore, NUS Business Sch, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Natl Univ Singapore, Logist Inst Asia Pacific, Singapore, Singapore
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Statistics; Large group decision-making; Decision risk; Risk attitude; CONSENSUS-BASED MODEL; FUZZY INFORMATION; WEIGHTS; MAKERS; MECHANISM;
D O I
10.1016/j.ins.2020.04.003
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In this study, we propose a statistical method incorporating decision risk and risk attitude into large group decision-making. The decision-making groups are divided into subgroups based on their attitudes to risk, and the evaluation information for the decision-makers within the same subgroup is combined to form the sample dataset. Next, the internal decision risk levels of all subgroups are measured using sample standard deviations and reduced through a feedback mechanism. Significance testing is used to determine the criterion weights and to measure the external decision risk levels of subgroups. The internal and external decision risk levels are then combined to yield the subgroup weights. Confidence interval is used to transform the sample data into interval numbers, which are then aggregated and analyzed to yield the decision-making results. Meanwhile, risk attitudes are taken into account throughout the decision-making process by various means. A case study and comparison analyses, along with sensitivity analyses, are used to illustrate the feasibility and rationality of the proposed method. Our experiments suggest that decision risk and risk attitude matter in large group decision-making. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:120 / 137
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A statistical approach to large-scale group decision making with incomplete hesitant fuzzy linguistic information by incorporating risk attitude
    Zhou, Yuanyuan
    Zheng, Chengli
    Wu, Peng
    Zhou, Ligang
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2024, 238
  • [2] RISK AND CONSERVATISM IN GROUP DECISION-MAKING
    MADARAS, GR
    BEM, DJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1968, 4 (03) : 350 - 365
  • [3] RISK SHARING AND GROUP DECISION-MAKING
    ELIASHBERG, J
    WINKLER, RL
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1981, 27 (11) : 1221 - 1235
  • [4] Incorporating uncertainty and risk in transportation investment decision-making
    Mishra, Sabyasachee
    Khasnabis, Snehamay
    Swain, Subrat
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 38 (07) : 738 - 760
  • [5] RISK DECISION-MAKING
    CARR, CJ
    [J]. REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 1985, 5 (02) : 121 - 122
  • [6] Multi-attribute quantum group decision-making method considering decision-makers’ risk attitude
    Shuli Yan
    Yingying Zeng
    Na Zhang
    [J]. Soft Computing, 2024, 28 : 5339 - 5357
  • [7] Multi-attribute quantum group decision-making method considering decision-makers' risk attitude
    Yan, Shuli
    Zeng, Yingying
    Zhang, Na
    [J]. SOFT COMPUTING, 2024, 28 (06) : 5339 - 5357
  • [8] Seismic risk decision-making of building structures considering subjective risk attitude
    考虑主观风险态度的建筑结构地震风险决策
    [J]. Li, Quanwang (li_quanwang@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn), 2018, Chinese Society of Civil Engineering (51):
  • [9] Decision-making model incorporating risk behavior under project risk management
    Li, Qi-Ming
    Shen, Li-Yin
    [J]. Xitong Gongcheng Lilun yu Shijian/System Engineering Theory and Practice, 2001, 21 (10):
  • [10] Statistics-based approach for large-scale group decision-making under incomplete Pythagorean fuzzy information with risk attitude
    Zhou, Yuanyuan
    Zheng, Chengli
    Goh, Mark
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2022, 235