A multiobjective stochastic simulation optimization algorithm

被引:29
|
作者
Gonzalez, Sebastian Rojas [1 ]
Jalali, Hamed [2 ]
Van Nieuwenhuyse, Inneke [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Decis Sci & Informat Management, Leuven, Belgium
[2] Neoma Business Sch, Dept Informat Syst Supply Chain & Decis Making, 1 Rue Marechal Juin, F-76825 Mont St Aignan, France
[3] UHasselt, Res Grp Logist, Quantitat Methods, Hasselt, Belgium
关键词
Simulation; Stochastic processes; Multiobjective simulation optimization; Kriging; EXPECTED-IMPROVEMENT; GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION; SEARCH; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2019.12.014
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The use of kriging metamodels in simulation optimization has become increasingly popular during recent years. The majority of the algorithms so far uses the ordinary (deterministic) kriging approach for constructing the metamodel, assuming that solutions have been sampled with infinite precision. This is a major issue when the simulation problem is stochastic: ignoring the noise in the outcomes may not only lead to an inaccurate metamodel, but also to potential errors in identifying the optimal points among those sampled. Moreover, most algorithms so far have focused on single-objective problems. In this article, we test the performance of a multiobjective simulation optimization algorithm that contains two crucial elements: the search phase implements stochastic kriging to account for the inherent noise in the outputs when constructing the metamodel, and the accuracy phase uses a well-known multiobjective ranking and selection procedure in view of maximizing the probability of selecting the true Paretooptimal points by allocating extra replications on competitive designs. We evaluate the impact of these elements on the search and identification effectiveness, for a set of test functions with different Pareto front geometries, and varying levels of heterogeneous noise. Our results show that the use of stochastic kriging is essential in improving the search efficiency; yet, the allocation procedure appears to lose effectiveness in settings with high noise. This emphasizes the need for further research on multiobjective ranking and selection methods. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:212 / 226
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Two metaheuristics for multiobjective stochastic combinatorial optimization
    Gutjahr, WJ
    [J]. STOCHASTIC ALGORITHMS: FOUNDATIONS AND APPLICATIONS, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 3777 : 116 - 125
  • [22] A method for stochastic multiobjective optimization of stand management
    Pukkala, T
    Miina, J
    [J]. FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 1997, 98 (02) : 189 - 203
  • [23] Multiobjective Stochastic Optimization Problems with Probability Constraints
    Kankova, Vlasta
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL METHODS IN ECONOMICS (MME 2014), 2014, : 384 - 389
  • [24] Multiobjective Optimization for the Stochastic Physical Search Problem
    Hudack, Jeffrey
    Gemelli, Nathaniel
    Brown, Daniel
    Loscalzo, Steven
    Oh, Jae C.
    [J]. CURRENT APPROACHES IN APPLIED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2015, 9101 : 212 - 221
  • [25] Memetic immune algorithm for multiobjective optimization
    [J]. Qi, Y.-T. (qi_yutao@163.com), 2013, Chinese Academy of Sciences (24):
  • [26] Multiobjective firefly algorithm for continuous optimization
    Yang, Xin-She
    [J]. ENGINEERING WITH COMPUTERS, 2013, 29 (02) : 175 - 184
  • [27] Multiobjective multifactorial immune algorithm for multiobjective multitask optimization problems
    Xu, Zhiwei
    Zhang, Kai
    [J]. APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2021, 107
  • [28] A hybrid immune multiobjective optimization algorithm
    Chen, Jianyong
    Lin, Qiuzhen
    Ji, Zhen
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2010, 204 (02) : 294 - 302
  • [29] Biased Multiobjective Optimization and Decomposition Algorithm
    Li, Hui
    Zhang, Qingfu
    Deng, Jingda
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CYBERNETICS, 2017, 47 (01) : 52 - 66
  • [30] A simulated annealing algorithm for multiobjective optimization
    Suppapitnarm, A
    Seffen, KA
    Parks, GT
    Clarkson, PJ
    [J]. ENGINEERING OPTIMIZATION, 2000, 33 (01) : 59 - 85