Neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy with consolidation chemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:8
|
作者
Patel, Agastya [1 ]
Spychalski, Piotr [1 ]
Corrao, Giulia [2 ,3 ]
Jereczek-Fossa, Barbara A. [2 ,3 ]
Glynne-Jones, Robert [4 ]
Garcia-Aguilar, Julio [5 ]
Kobiela, Jarek [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Gdansk, Dept Gen Surg Endocrine & Transplant Surg, Ul Smoluchowskiego 17, PL-80214 Gdansk, Poland
[2] Univ Milan, Dept Oncol & Hematooncol, Milan, Italy
[3] IRCCS, IEO European Inst Oncol, Div Radiotherapy, Milan, Italy
[4] Mt Vernon Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Northwood, Middx, England
[5] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Colorectal Serv, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
PREOPERATIVE SHORT-COURSE; LONG-COURSE CHEMORADIATION; COURSE RADIATION-THERAPY; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; X; 5; GY; DELAYED SURGERY; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; COURSE CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; FOLFOX CHEMOTHERAPY; COMPLETE RESPONSE;
D O I
10.1080/0284186X.2021.1953137
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Short-course radiotherapy with consolidation chemotherapy (SCRT-CCT) has emerged as a promising alternative to the long course chemoradiotherapy (LCRT) regimen in locally advanced rectal cancer management. The systematic review and meta-analysis is aimed at summarizing current evidence on SCRT-CCT and comparing it to LCRT. Material and methods Electronic databases of MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Cochrane library were searched using a predefined search strategy returning 3314 articles. This review included 11 studies (6 randomized trials and 5 non-randomized studies) on SCRT-CCT regimen based on seven different cohorts. Weighted arithmetic means and forest plots were generated to determine summary estimates. Results The probability of achieving pathological complete response (pCR) was higher with SCRT-CCT compared to LCRT (RR = 1.75, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.41-2.19). No statistically significant difference in 3-year overall survival (OS) was observed between the two groups (risk ratio [RR] = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.98-1.14). The weighted arithmetic mean of 3-year OS and pCR was 83.6% versus 80.9%, and 24.5% versus 13.6% for SCRT-CCT and LCRT, respectively. R0 resection and T-downstaging rates ranged from 69.2-100% to 47-75% for SCRT-CCT, and 71-92.3% and 41-75% for LCRT, respectively. The regimens had similar compliance, postoperative, and late toxicity, however, acute toxicity rates varied primarily due to differences in treatment protocols. Conclusions This review highlights the ability of SCRT-CCT to produce improved tumor response with comparable OS, R0 resection, and T-downstaging at the cost of increased acute toxicity. However, heterogeneity in treatment protocols across studies makes it difficult to provide definitive conclusions regarding the regimen. Several ongoing trials are expected to provide further evidence confirming the findings of RAPIDO trial and detail appropriate SCRT-CCT protocols to improve oncological outcomes, minimize toxicity, and determine its effectiveness as the standard-of-care for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1308 / 1316
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Short-course versus long-course neoadjuvant radiotherapy for lower rectal cancer: a systematic review
    Sajid, M. S.
    Siddiqui, M. R. S.
    Kianifard, B.
    Baig, M. K.
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2010, 179 (02) : 165 - 171
  • [22] Short-course versus long-course neoadjuvant radiotherapy for lower rectal cancer: a systematic review
    M. S. Sajid
    M. R. S. Siddiqui
    B. Kianifard
    M. K. Baig
    Irish Journal of Medical Science, 2010, 179 : 165 - 171
  • [23] A Prospective Observational Study Comparing Long-Course Conventional Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy with Short-Course Radiotherapy Followed by Consolidation Chemotherapy with Delayed Surgery in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
    Thakur, Niketa
    Seam, Rajeev K.
    Gupta, Manoj K.
    Gupta, Manish
    Fotedar, Vikas
    Vats, Siddharth
    Rana, Sakshi
    Vias, Poorva
    Ahuja, Rachit
    SOUTH ASIAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2020, 9 (02) : 80 - 85
  • [24] Meta-analysis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer
    Huaqin Lin
    Lei Wang
    Xiaohong Zhong
    Xueqing Zhang
    Lingdong Shao
    Junxin Wu
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 19
  • [25] Meta-analysis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer
    Lin, Huaqin
    Wang, Lei
    Zhong, Xiaohong
    Zhang, Xueqing
    Shao, Lingdong
    Wu, Junxin
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 19 (01)
  • [26] Neoadjuvant radiotherapy of locally advanced rectal cancer: short-course radiation VS long-course chemo radiation
    Sabarinath, P. S.
    Anand, A. S.
    Jayakumar, K. L.
    Kuriakose, V. G.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2015, 26 : 56 - 56
  • [27] A novel preoperative protocol for locally advanced rectal cancer: Hyperfractionated short-course radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy
    Doi, Hiroshi
    Beppu, Naohito
    Takada, Yasuhiro
    Niwa, Yasue
    Fujiwara, Masayuki
    Kimura, Fumihiko
    Yanagi, Hidenori
    Yamanaka, Naoki
    Kamikonya, Norihiko
    Hirota, Shozo
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 31 (04)
  • [28] Short-course radiotherapy with immediate or delayed surgery in rectal cancer: A meta-analysis
    Wu, Haoyan
    Fang, Chao
    Huang, Libin
    Fan, Chuanwen
    Wang, Cun
    Yang, Lie
    Li, Yuan
    Zhou, Zongguang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 56 : 195 - 202
  • [29] Effect of short-course radiotherapy on postoperative complications in locally advanced rectal cancer
    Hoendervangers, S.
    Sparreboom, C.
    Van Grevenstein, H.
    Verkooijen, L.
    Lange, J.
    Doornebosch, P.
    Intven, M.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2019, 133 : S429 - S429
  • [30] Short-course radiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: an IAEA randomized trial
    Rosenblatt, E.
    Jones, G. W.
    Valentini, V.
    Gambacorta, M. A.
    Menon, T.
    Engineer, R.
    Robertson, B.
    Frobe, A.
    Ulloa-Balmaceda, A.
    Ospino-Pena, R.
    Nuryadi, E.
    Nagarajan, M.
    Lakier, R.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2015, 115 : S95 - S96