Molecular parameters of genome instability: Roles of fragile genes at common fragile sites

被引:29
|
作者
Pichiorri, Flavia [1 ]
Ishii, Hideshi [2 ,3 ]
Okumura, Hiroshi [1 ]
Trapass, Francesco [4 ]
Wang, Ya [5 ]
Huebner, Kay [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Dept Mol Virol Immunol & Med Genet, Ctr Comprehens Canc, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Jichi Med Univ, Ctr Mol Med, Shimotsuke Shi, Tochigi, Japan
[3] Natl Inst Radiol Sci, Chiba 260, Japan
[4] Magna Graecia Univ Catanzaro, Dipartimento Med Sperimentale Clin, I-88100 Catanzaro, Italy
[5] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
关键词
common fragile sites; DNA damage checkpoint; FHIT; DNA repair;
D O I
10.1002/jcb.21560
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Common chromosome fragile sites occur at specific sequences within mammalian genomes that exhibit apparent single-stranded regions in mitotic chromosomes on exposure of cells to replication stress. Recent progress in the characterization of sequences, and more precise mapping of common fragile sites in mammalian and yeast genomes, has led to the exact placement of large common fragile regions straddling the borders of chromosomal G and R bands, with early and late replicating genomic regions, respectively, and could lead to breakthroughs in understanding the function of these evolutionarily conserved but highly recombinogenic chromosome elements. Deficiency of genes involved in DNA damage checkpoint responses, such as ATR, CHK 1, HUS 1 leads to increased frequency of fragile site instability. Some of these fragile sites, particularly FRA3B, encode genes that are themselves involved in the protection of cells from DNA damage through various mechanisms. Protection of maininalian genomes from accumulation of DNA damage in somatic cells is critical during development, puberty and during the reproductive lifespan, and occurs through mechanisms involving surveillance of the genome for damage, signals to the cell cycle machinery to stop cell cycle progression, signals to repair machinery to repair damage, signals to resume cycling or initiate apoptotic programs, depending on the extent of damage and repair. When genes involved in these processes are altered or deleted, cancer can occur. The tumor suppressor gene, FHIT at the FRA3B locus, and possibly other fragile genes, is a common target of damage and paradoxically encodes a protein with roles in protection from DNA damage.
引用
收藏
页码:1525 / 1533
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] COMMON FRAGILE SITES - THEIR PREVALENCE IN SUBJECTS WITH CONSTITUTIONAL AND ACQUIRED CHROMOSOMAL INSTABILITY
    TEDESCHI, B
    PORFIRIO, B
    VERNOLE, P
    CAPOROSSI, D
    DALLAPICCOLA, B
    NICOLETTI, B
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 1987, 27 (02): : 471 - 482
  • [32] Increased chromosomal instability at common fragile sites in Seckel syndrome.
    Durkin, SG
    Casper, AM
    Glover, TW
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2003, 73 (05) : 229 - 229
  • [33] Fragile sites and minisatellite repeat instability
    Handt, O
    Sutherland, GR
    Richards, RI
    MOLECULAR GENETICS AND METABOLISM, 2000, 70 (02) : 99 - 105
  • [34] Mechanisms of common fragile site instability
    Glover, TW
    Arlt, MF
    Casper, AM
    Durkin, SG
    HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS, 2005, 14 : R197 - R205
  • [35] The molecular basis of fragile sites
    Dobkin, C
    Zhong, N
    Brown, WT
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 1996, 59 (02) : 478 - 478
  • [36] Common fragile sites, extremely large genes, neural development and cancer
    Smith, DI
    Zhu, Y
    McAvoy, S
    Kuhn, R
    CANCER LETTERS, 2006, 232 (01) : 48 - 57
  • [37] FAMILY STUDY OF COMMON FRAGILE SITES
    SUGIO, Y
    KUROKI, Y
    HUMAN GENETICS, 1989, 82 (02) : 191 - 193
  • [38] Common fragile sites: protection and repair
    Li, Shibo
    Wu, Xiaohua
    CELL AND BIOSCIENCE, 2020, 10 (01):
  • [39] Common fragile sites: protection and repair
    Shibo Li
    Xiaohua Wu
    Cell & Bioscience, 10
  • [40] Common fragile sites and cancer (Review)
    Smith, DI
    Huang, HJ
    Wang, L
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY, 1998, 12 (01) : 187 - 196