Preferences for Training Options: A Conjoint Analysis

被引:4
|
作者
Gan, Chui Goh [1 ]
Lee, Julie Anne [2 ]
Soutar, Geoffrey N. [2 ]
机构
[1] Blue Dge Analyt & Consulting Pte Ltd, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Univ Western Australia, Sch Business, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia
关键词
CONSUMER PERCEPTIONS; INFORMATION; PRICE; QUALITY; IMPACT; BRAND; MODEL;
D O I
10.1002/hrdq.20019
中图分类号
F24 [劳动经济];
学科分类号
020106 ; 020207 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Singapore is a growing educational hub for the Asia Pacific region. However, no prior research has examined how Singaporean managers trade off attributes of training programs when making executive training decisions. The current study used conjoint analysis to identify the most important attributes of training programs as word of mouth, trainers' practical experience, and institutional reputation. Three clearly distinct segments were found: pragmatic executives, who preferred experienced trainers and were somewhat price-sensitive; willing-to-pay executives, who were willing to pay higher fees; and quality-conscious executives, who preferred attribute levels that relate to high quality, including trainers with a higher level of practical experience and an above-average institutional reputation.
引用
收藏
页码:307 / 330
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Exploring Guest Preferences of Breakfast Menu: Conjoint Analysis
    Lee, Seung Hyun
    Lee, Jaeyong
    Neilson, Sara M. F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CULINARY SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 16 (02) : 149 - 164
  • [22] A conjoint analysis of consumer preferences for vegetable products.
    MacKenzie, JEA
    Spiller, HB
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1996, 78 (05) : 1395 - 1395
  • [23] Civil servants' preferences for nonprofit contractors: A conjoint analysis
    Zhang, Youlang
    Shao, Zijie
    [J]. GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF POLICY ADMINISTRATION AND INSTITUTIONS, 2022, 35 (04): : 1049 - 1075
  • [24] A Conjoint analysis of Turkish consumer preferences for energy drinks
    Dolekoglu, Celile O.
    Kara, Ali
    Erel, Gurkan
    DeShields, Oscar W.
    [J]. IKTISAT ISLETME VE FINANS, 2010, 25 (290): : 89 - 108
  • [25] Conjoint Analysis of Treatment Preferences for Nondisplaced Scaphoid Fractures
    Shammas, Ronnie L.
    Mela, Nathan
    Wallace, Scott
    Tong, Betty C.
    Huber, Joel
    Mithani, Suhail K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2018, 43 (07): : 678.e1 - 678.e9
  • [26] Conjoint analysis of public preferences for farmland protection.
    Centenera, MC
    Mackenzie, EO
    Nairn, DC
    Mackenzie, J
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1996, 78 (05) : 1413 - 1413
  • [27] Optimizing military mental health and stress resilience training through the lens of trainee preferences: A conjoint analysis approach
    Forchuk, Callista A.
    Kocha, Ilyana
    Granek, Joshua A.
    Dempster, Kylie S.
    Younger, William A.
    Gargala, Dominic
    Plouffe, Rachel A.
    Bailey, Suzanne
    Guest, Kim
    Richardson, J. Don
    Nazarov, Anthony
    [J]. MILITARY PSYCHOLOGY, 2024,
  • [28] Conjoint analysis -: A useful tool for assessing preferences for environmental issues
    Alriksson, Stina
    Oberg, Tomas
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2008, 15 (02) : 119 - 119
  • [29] Patient Preferences Associated with Therapies for Psoriatic Arthritis: A Conjoint Analysis
    Xu, Yihua
    Sudharshan, Lavanya
    Hsu, Ming-Ann
    Koenig, Andrew S.
    Cappelleri, Joseph C.
    Liu, Wen F.
    Smith, Timothy W.
    Pasquale, Margaret K.
    [J]. AMERICAN HEALTH AND DRUG BENEFITS, 2018, 11 (08): : 408 - 416
  • [30] Conjoint analysis of preferences for cardiac risk assessment in primary care
    Sassi, F
    McDaid, D
    Ricciardi, W
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2005, 21 (02) : 211 - 218