Radiation dose to the lens during craniospinal irradiation - An improvement in proton radiotherapy technique

被引:36
|
作者
Cochran, David M. [2 ,3 ]
Yock, Torunn I. [1 ]
Adams, Judith A. [1 ]
Tarbell, Nancy J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Sch Med, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Div Hlth Sci & Technol, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[3] MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
关键词
medulloblastoma; craniospinal irradiation; proton beam therapy; radiation-induced cataract;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.08.027
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the effect of angle modification of cranial field proton beam therapy on the radiation dose delivered to the lens during craniospinal irradiation (CSI). Methods and Materials: Thirty-nine patients with central nervous system tumors who received CSI with a posterior fossa boost were analyzed for the radiation dose to the lens. Thirteen patients received cranial field treatment using standard opposed-lateral proton beams, and 26 patients received treatment with angled posterior-oblique proton beams. The lens dose in a test case also was evaluated by comparing conventional X-rays with the two proton beam planning methods by using a CMS/Xio three-dimensional planning system. Results: Substantial lens dose sparing was realized with the angling of the cranial proton beams 15 degrees-20 degrees to the posterior. In the 39 treated patients who were analyzed (median age, 7 years), average dose delivered to the lens was decreased by approximately 50% by angling of the proton beams, with the average maximum dose decreasing from 74% to 40% of the prescribed dose (p < 0.0001). Significant lens sparing was seen in patients 10 years and younger (median age, 6 years; p < 0.0001), whereas an insignificant decrease was seen in older patients (median age, 16 years; p = 0.14). With the opposed-lateral technique (median age, 6 years), the lens dose increased significantly with decreasing age (p = 0.002), whereas there was no effect of age on lens dose in the angled beam-treated group (median age, 8.5 years; p = 0.73). Conclusion: The present study clearly shows an advantage in sparing of the lens dose by angling the beams used during proton beam CSI. This effect is most pronounced in patients 10 years and younger because of anatomic effects of sinus development. (c) 2008 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1336 / 1342
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Proton craniospinal irradiation during the third trimester of pregnancy
    Kalbasi, Anusha
    Kirk, Maura
    Teo, Boon-Keng Kevin
    Diffenderfer, Eric
    Ding, Xuanfeng
    McDonough, James
    Murphy, Erin
    Hill-Kayser, Christine
    PRACTICAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2018, 8 (03) : 213 - 216
  • [12] Stray radiation dose and second cancer risk for a pediatric patient receiving craniospinal irradiation with proton beams
    Taddei, Phillip J.
    Mirkovic, Dragan
    Fontenot, Jonas D.
    Giebeler, Annelise
    Zheng, Yuanshui
    Kornguth, David
    Mohan, Radhe
    Newhauser, Wayne D.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2009, 54 (08): : 2259 - 2275
  • [13] NEW RADIATION THERAPY TECHNIQUE FOR CRANIOSPINAL IRRADIATION WITHOUT JUNCTION MOVEMENT
    Lee, J. M.
    Ann, S. K.
    Jeong, K.
    Yoon, J. W.
    Cho, J. H.
    Suh, C. O.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2010, 96 : S560 - S561
  • [14] CRANIOSPINAL IRRADIATION TECHNIQUES: A DOSIMETRIC COMPARISON OF PROTON BEAMS WITH STANDARD AND ADVANCED PHOTON RADIOTHERAPY
    Yoon, Myonggeun
    Shin, Dong Ho
    Kim, Jinsung
    Kim, Jong Won
    Kim, Dae Woong
    Park, Sung Yong
    Lee, Se Byeong
    Kim, Joo Young
    Park, Hyeon-Jin
    Park, Byung-Kiu
    Shin, Sang Hoon
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 81 (03): : 637 - 646
  • [15] The Effect of Radiation Safety Glasses for Reducing the Lens Dose during Radiotherapy Imaging
    Gazarin, A.
    Moustakis, C.
    Haverkamp, U.
    Eich, H.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2017, 193 : S170 - S170
  • [16] Technique, outcomes, and acute toxicities in adults treated with proton beam craniospinal irradiation
    Barney, Christian L.
    Brown, Aaron P.
    Grosshans, David R.
    McAleer, Mary Frances
    de Groot, John F.
    Puduvalli, Vinay
    Tucker, Susan L.
    Crawford, Cody N.
    Gilbert, Mark R.
    Brown, Paul D.
    Mahajan, Anita
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2014, 16 (02) : 303 - 309
  • [17] Fetal dose from proton pencil beam scanning craniospinal irradiation during pregnancy: a Monte Carlo study
    Yeom, Yeon Soo
    Griffin, Keith T.
    Mille, Matthew M.
    Lee, Choonik
    O'Reilly, Shannon
    Dong, Lei
    Jung, Jae Won
    Lee, Choonsik
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2022, 67 (03):
  • [18] Impact of radiation techniques on hematological toxicity during craniospinal irradiation
    Madan, R.
    Dhayalan, S.
    Oinam, A. S.
    Tomar, P.
    Kumar, N.
    Goyal, S.
    Khosla, D.
    Periasamy, K.
    Sahoo, S. K.
    Ahuja, C. K.
    Chatterjee, D.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 170 : S988 - S989
  • [19] Analysis of Robustness of Proton Pencil Beam Scanning Technique for Delivery of Craniospinal Irradiation
    Lin, H.
    Kirk, M.
    Zhai, H.
    Ding, X.
    Liu, H.
    Hill-Kayser, C.
    Lustig, R.
    Tochner, Z.
    McDonough, J.
    Both, S.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (06) : 370 - 370
  • [20] Dosimetric Predictors of Acute Lymphopenia during Proton Craniospinal Irradiation in Children
    Cordova, J. S.
    Huang, J.
    Perkins, S. M.
    Badiyan, S. N.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2022, 114 (03): : E478 - E479