The importance of haptic feedback in laparoscopic suturing training and the additive value of virtual reality simulation

被引:89
|
作者
Botden, Sanne M. B. I. [1 ]
Torab, Fawaz [2 ]
Buzink, Sonja N. [1 ,3 ]
Jakimowicz, Jack J. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Catharina Hosp, Eindhoven, Netherlands
[2] UAE Univ, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Al Ain, U Arab Emirates
[3] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Ind Design Engn, Delft, Netherlands
关键词
laparoscopy; simulation; box trainer; virtual reality; laparoscopic suturing;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-007-9589-x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction Previous studies on the difference between physical, augmented and virtual reality (VR) simulation state that haptic feedback is an important feature in laparoscopic suturing simulation. Objective assessment is important to improve skills during training. This study focuses on the additive value of VR simulation for laparoscopic suturing training. Methods All participants of several European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES)-approved laparoscopic skills courses (N = 45) filled out a questionnaire on their opinion on laparoscopic suturing training. Additionally, participants with little or no laparoscopic suturing experience were allotted to two groups: group A (N = 10), who started training on the box trainer and subsequently the VR simulator (SimSurgery), and group B (N = 10), who began on the VR simulator followed by the box. Finally, suturing and knot-tying skills were assessed by an expert observer, using a standard evaluation form (eight items on five-point-Likert scale). The same was done after the initial training on the box in group A, as a control. Significant differences were calculated with the independent-sample t-test and the paired t-test. Results The total score of group A was higher than both group B and control (means of 30.80, 27.60, 28.20, respectively), but not significantly. The only tendency to a significant difference between group A and B was found in 'taking proper bites' (mean 4.10 versus 3.60, p = 0.054). All the participants scored the features of the box trainer significantly higher than those of the VR simulator (p < 0.001), 46.7% was of the opinion that the box alone would be sufficient for laparoscopic suturing training. Conclusion From this study we can conclude that VR simulation does not have a significant additional value in laparoscopic suturing training, over traditional box trainers. One should consider that the future development in VR simulation should focus on basic skills and component tasks of procedural training in laparoscopic surgery, rather than laparoscopic suturing.
引用
收藏
页码:1214 / 1222
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Preliminary Study of Virtual Reality and Model Simulation for Learning Laparoscopic Suturing Skills
    McDougall, Elspeth M.
    Kolla, Surendra B.
    Santos, Rosanne T.
    Gan, Jennifer M.
    Box, Geoffrey N.
    Louie, Michael K.
    Gamboa, Aldrin J. R.
    Kaplan, Adam G.
    Moskowitz, Ross M.
    Andrade, Lorena A.
    Skarecky, Douglas W.
    Osann, Kathryn E.
    Clayman, Ralph V.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 182 (03): : 1018 - 1025
  • [22] THE ROLE OF HAPTIC FEEDBACK IN LAPAROSCOPIC TRAINING
    Salkini, Mohamad W.
    Kiehl, Nicholai
    Gaitonde, Krishnanath
    Doarn, Charles
    Brodrick, Timothy
    Donovan, James F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (04): : 821 - 822
  • [23] The Virtual Reality Simulator-based Catheter Training System with Haptic Feedback
    Guo, Shuxiang
    Yu, Miao
    Song, Yu
    Zhang, Linshuai
    [J]. 2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MECHATRONICS AND AUTOMATION (ICMA), 2017, : 922 - 926
  • [24] An Initial Study of Ingrown Toenail Removal Simulation in Virtual Reality with Bimanual Haptic Feedback for Podiatric Surgical Training
    Abounader, Jason
    Kim, Kwangtaek
    Caldwell, Bryan D.
    Hardy, Mark A.
    [J]. 2023 IEEE SENSORS APPLICATIONS SYMPOSIUM, SAS, 2023,
  • [25] Lack of transfer of skills after virtual reality simulator training with haptic feedback
    Vapenstad, Cecilie
    Hofstad, Erlend Fagertun
    Bo, Lars Eirik
    Kuhry, Esther
    Johnsen, Gjermund
    Marvik, Ronald
    Lango, Thomas
    Hernes, Toril Nagelhus
    [J]. MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY & ALLIED TECHNOLOGIES, 2017, 26 (06) : 346 - 354
  • [26] Limited value of haptics in virtual reality laparoscopic cholecystectomy training
    Jonathan R. Thompson
    Anthony C. Leonard
    Charles R. Doarn
    Matt J. Roesch
    Timothy J. Broderick
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2011, 25 : 1107 - 1114
  • [27] Limited value of haptics in virtual reality laparoscopic cholecystectomy training
    Thompson, Jonathan R.
    Leonard, Anthony C.
    Doarn, Charles R.
    Roesch, Matt J.
    Broderick, Timothy J.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2011, 25 (04): : 1107 - 1114
  • [28] Performance and perception of haptic feedback in a laparoscopic 3D virtual reality simulator
    Hagelsteen, Kristine
    Johansson, Richard
    Ekelund, Mikael
    Bergenfelz, Anders
    Anderberg, Magnus
    [J]. MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY & ALLIED TECHNOLOGIES, 2019, 28 (05) : 309 - 316
  • [29] Virtual reality simulation of surgery with haptic feedback based on the boundary element method
    Wang, P.
    Becker, A. A.
    Jones, I. A.
    Glover, A. T.
    Benford, S. D.
    Greenhalgh, C. M.
    Vloeberghs, M.
    [J]. COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 2007, 85 (7-8) : 331 - 339
  • [30] Perceiving haptic feedback in virtual reality simulators
    Cecilie Våpenstad
    Erlend Fagertun Hofstad
    Thomas Langø
    Ronald Mårvik
    Magdalena Karolina Chmarra
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2013, 27 : 2391 - 2397