Detecting Port Scan Attacks Using Logistic Regression

被引:14
|
作者
Abu Al-Haija, Qasem [1 ]
Saleh, Eyad [1 ]
Alnabhan, Mohammad [1 ]
机构
[1] Princess Sumaya Univ Technol PSUT, Dept Comp Sci Cybersecur, Amman, Jordan
关键词
Network Traffic; Port Scan Attacks; Logistic Regression; Anomaly Detection; MACHINE; CLASSIFICATION;
D O I
10.1109/ISAECT53699.2021.9668562
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Port scanning attack is a common cyber-attack where an attacker directs packets with diverse port numbers to scan accessible services aiming to discover open/weak ports in a network. Hence, several detection/prevention techniques were developed to frustrate such cyber-attacks. In this paper, we propose a new inclusive discovery scheme that evaluate five supervised machine learning classifiers, including logistic regression, decision trees, linear/quadratic discriminant, naive Bayes, and ensemble boosted trees. We compared the performance of these models via detection accuracy using a contemporary dataset for port scanning attacks (PSA-2017). As a result, the best performance results have recorded for logistic regression based detection scheme with 99.4%, 99.9%, 99.4%, 99.7%, and 0.454 mu Sec registered for accuracy, precision, recall, F-score, and detection overhead. Lastly, the comparison with existing models exhibited the proficiency and advantage of our model with enhanced attack discovery speed.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Detecting Slow Port Scan Using Fuzzy Rule Interpolation
    Almseidin, Mohammad
    Al-kasassbeh, Mouhammd
    Kovacs, Szilveszter
    [J]. 2019 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NEW TRENDS IN COMPUTING SCIENCES (ICTCS), 2019, : 33 - 38
  • [2] Detecting speculative language using syntactic dependencies and logistic regression
    Vlachos, Andreas
    Craven, Mark
    [J]. CoNLL-2010: Shared Task - Fourteenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, Proceedings of the Shared Task, 2010, : 18 - 25
  • [3] A logistic regression model for detecting prominences
    Maghbouleh, A
    [J]. ICSLP 96 - FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SPOKEN LANGUAGE PROCESSING, PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1-4, 1996, : 2443 - 2445
  • [4] Detecting heterogeneity in logistic regression models
    Balázs, K
    Hidegkuti, I
    De Boeck, P
    [J]. APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2006, 30 (04) : 322 - 344
  • [5] PALOR: Poisoning Attacks Against Logistic Regression
    Wen, Jialin
    Zhao, Benjamin Zi Hao
    Xue, Minhui
    Qian, Haifeng
    [J]. INFORMATION SECURITY AND PRIVACY, ACISP 2020, 2020, 12248 : 447 - 460
  • [6] DETECTING DIFFERENTIAL ITEM FUNCTIONING USING LOGISTIC-REGRESSION PROCEDURES
    SWAMINATHAN, H
    ROGERS, HJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT, 1990, 27 (04) : 361 - 370
  • [7] Penalized logistic regression for detecting gene interactions
    Park, Mee Young
    Hastie, Trevor
    [J]. BIOSTATISTICS, 2008, 9 (01) : 30 - 50
  • [8] Alternative Engine to Detect and Block Port Scan Attacks using Virtual Network Environments
    Fuertes, Walter
    Zambranonandh, Patricio
    Sanchez, Marco
    Gamboa, Pablo
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND NETWORK SECURITY, 2011, 11 (11): : 14 - 23
  • [9] Logistic regression versus XGBoost for detecting burned areas using satellite images
    Militino, A. F.
    Goyena, H.
    Perez-Goya, U.
    Ugarte, M. D.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECOLOGICAL STATISTICS, 2024, 31 (01) : 57 - 77
  • [10] Detecting Differential Item Functioning Using the Logistic Regression Procedure in Small Samples
    Lee, Sunbok
    [J]. APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2017, 41 (01) : 30 - 43