Evaluation of neural-network classifiers for weed species discrimination

被引:69
|
作者
Burks, TF
Shearer, SA
Heath, JR
Donohue, KD
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Inst Food & Agr Sci, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[2] Univ Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2004.12.012
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
The potential environmental impact of herbicide utilisation has stimulated research into new methods of weed control. Selective herbicide application offers the possibility to reduce herbicide usage while maintaining weed control. The research reported utilised colour co-occurrence method (CCM) texture analysis techniques to evaluate three different neural-network classifiers for potential use in real-time weed control systems. An image data set consisting of 33 unique texture features for each image in a six class data set (40 images per class) was generated for the following classes; foxtail, crabgrass, common lambsquarter, velvetleaf, morning-glory, and clear soil surface. The data sets were evaluated using a stepwise variable selection procedure to provide six unique data models separated according to hue-saturation-intensity colour features. A comparison study of the classification capabilities of three neural-network models (backpropagation, counterpropagation, and radial basis function) was conducted. It was found that the backpropagation neural-network classifier provided the best classification performance and was capable of classification accuracies of 97%, which exceeded traditional statistical classification procedure accuracy of 93%. When comparing the three neural-network methodologies, the backpropagation method not only achieved a higher classification accuracy, but also had less computational requirements. (c) 2005 Silsoe Research Institute. All rights reserved Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 304
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] ON THE GENERALIZATION ABILITY OF NEURAL-NETWORK CLASSIFIERS
    MUSAVI, MT
    CHAN, KH
    HUMMELS, DM
    KALANTRI, K
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 1994, 16 (06) : 659 - 663
  • [2] COMBINING THE RESULTS OF SEVERAL NEURAL-NETWORK CLASSIFIERS
    ROGOVA, G
    [J]. NEURAL NETWORKS, 1994, 7 (05) : 777 - 781
  • [3] Energy Optimisation of Cascading Neural-network Classifiers
    Agrawal, Vinamra
    Gopalan, Anandha
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SMART CITIES AND GREEN ICT SYSTEMS (SMARTGREENS), 2020, : 149 - 158
  • [4] The eigenspace separation transform for neural-network classifiers
    Torrieri, D
    [J]. NEURAL NETWORKS, 1999, 12 (03) : 419 - 427
  • [5] STRONG UNIVERSAL CONSISTENCY OF NEURAL-NETWORK CLASSIFIERS
    FARAGO, A
    LUGOSI, G
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION THEORY, 1993, 39 (04) : 1146 - 1151
  • [6] THE COMBINATION OF MULTIPLE CLASSIFIERS BY A NEURAL-NETWORK APPROACH
    HUANG, YS
    LIU, K
    SUEN, CY
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PATTERN RECOGNITION AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 1995, 9 (03) : 579 - 597
  • [7] Discrimination of Rice Weeds by Neural-network
    Fan, Deyao
    Yao, Qing
    Tang, Jian
    Yang, Baojun
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2010 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON IMAGE ANALYSIS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2010, : 204 - 208
  • [8] A structural learning of neural-network classifiers using PCA networks and Species Genetic Algorithms
    Kim, SW
    Shin, SH
    Aoki, Y
    [J]. IEICE TRANSACTIONS ON FUNDAMENTALS OF ELECTRONICS COMMUNICATIONS AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 1998, E81A (06) : 1183 - 1186
  • [9] A linear transform that simplifies and improves neural-network classifiers
    Torrieri, D
    [J]. ICNN - 1996 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NEURAL NETWORKS, VOLS. 1-4, 1996, : 1738 - 1743
  • [10] A NEURAL-NETWORK MODEL FOR TEXTURE-DISCRIMINATION
    XING, J
    GERSTEIN, GL
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS, 1993, 69 (02) : 97 - 108