Shelter-in-place orders, loneliness, and collaborative behavior

被引:2
|
作者
Babin, J. Jobu [1 ]
Foray, Marine [1 ]
Hussey, Andrew [2 ]
机构
[1] Western Illinois Univ, Coll Business & Technol, Macomb, IL 61455 USA
[2] Univ Memphis, Fogelman Coll Business & Econ, BA 423, Memphis, TN 38152 USA
关键词
Loneliness; Collaborative behavior; Teamwork; Shelter-in-place orders; COVID-19; Games; Stag hunt; RISK ATTITUDES; WORK; CONSEQUENCES; COOPERATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ehb.2021.101056
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The outbreak of COVID-19 resulted in numerous jurisdictions instituting "shelter-in-place" orders (SPOs). While designed to restrict or impede normal levels of social proximity, SPOs altered the way or degree to which workers interact with each other and have likely imposed a toll on employee well-being. The authors exploit the temporal and geographic variation in U.S. SPOs to investigate their effect on loneliness among online workers. Variation in loneliness is then linked to worker behavior in a simple two-person, collaborative task (a framed stag hunt). The analysis reveals a strong positive relationship between SPOs and loneliness on average, peaking during the wave associated with the most prolonged duration of isolation. SPOs disproportionately impacted workers in occupations not substantially involving teamwork or collaboration. As reported loneliness increases, the probability of an individual collaborating in a simple interactive workplace scenario decreases significantly. In the final survey wave, SPOs are scarcer, loneliness subsides, and cooperative behavior increases dramatically.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A systems approach to the design of safe-rooms for shelter-in-place
    Bennett, James S.
    BUILDING SIMULATION, 2009, 2 (01) : 41 - 51
  • [42] Impact of COVID-19 related shelter-in-place orders on PrEP access, usage and HIV risk behaviors in the United States
    Brawley, S.
    Dinger, J.
    Nguyen, C.
    Anderson, J.
    JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL AIDS SOCIETY, 2020, 23 : 178 - 178
  • [43] The Social Divide of Social Distancing: Shelter-in-Place Behavior in Santiago During the Covid-19 Pandemic
    Carranza, Aldo
    Goic, Marcel
    Lara, Eduardo
    Olivares, Marcelo
    Weintraub, Gabriel Y.
    Covarrubia, Julio
    Escobedo, Cristian
    Jara, Natalia
    Basso, Leonardo J.
    MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2022, 68 (03) : 2016 - 2027
  • [44] WHEN DO SHELTER-IN-PLACE ORDERS FIGHT COVID-19 BEST? POLICY HETEROGENEITY ACROSS STATES AND ADOPTION TIME
    Dave, Dhaval
    Friedson, Andrew I.
    Matsuzawa, Kyutaro
    Sabia, Joseph J.
    ECONOMIC INQUIRY, 2021, 59 (01) : 29 - 52
  • [45] International Students' Perceptions of Shelter-In-Place Notifications: Implications for University Officials
    Johnson, Thomas C.
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS, 2014, 4 (03) : 247 - 261
  • [46] Distribution Transformer Aging Due to COVID-19 Shelter-in-Place
    McBee, Kerry D.
    Fareez, Izar
    2021 IEEE PES/IAS POWERAFRICA CONFERENCE, 2021, : 253 - 257
  • [47] Hospital Evacuation and Shelter-in-Place: Who Is Responsible for Decision-Making?
    McGinty, Meghan D.
    Burke, Thomas A.
    Barnett, Daniel J.
    Smith, Katherine C.
    Resnick, Beth
    Rutkow, Lainie
    DISASTER MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH PREPAREDNESS, 2016, 10 (03) : 320 - 324
  • [48] "There's a whole world, and I ain't in it": Older Adults' Experiences with Technology During the COVID-19 Shelter-in-Place Orders
    Newmark, R. L.
    Smith, A.
    Perissinotto, C. M.
    Kotwal, A. A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2021, 69 : S195 - S195
  • [49] Decision Processes and Determinants of Hospital Evacuation and Shelter-in-Place During Hurricane Sandy
    McGinty, Meghan D.
    Burke, Thomas A.
    Resnick, Beth
    Barnett, Daniel J.
    Smith, Katherine C.
    Rutkow, Lainie
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MANAGEMENT AND PRACTICE, 2017, 23 (01): : 29 - 36
  • [50] Analyzing Evacuation Versus Shelter-in-Place Strategies After a Terrorist Nuclear Detonation
    Wein, Lawrence M.
    Choi, Youngsoo
    Denuit, Sylvie
    RISK ANALYSIS, 2010, 30 (09) : 1315 - 1327