An uncertainty-quantification framework for assessing accuracy, sensitivity, and robustness in computational fluid dynamics

被引:8
|
作者
Rezaeiravesh, S. [1 ]
Vinuesa, R.
Schlatter, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] KTH Royal Inst Technol, SimEx FLOW, Engn Mech, SE-10044 Stockholm, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Uncertainty quantification; Computational fluid dynamics; Combined uncertainties; Polynomial chaos expansion; Gaussian process regression; LARGE-EDDY SIMULATIONS; DIRECT NUMERICAL-SIMULATION; POLYNOMIAL-CHAOS; FLOW; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jocs.2022.101688
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Combining different existing uncertainty quantification (UQ) techniques, a framework is obtained to assess a set of metrics in computational physics problems, in general, and computational fluid dynamics (CFD), in particular. The metrics include accuracy, sensitivity and robustness of the simulator's outputs with respect to uncertain inputs and parameters. These inputs and parameters are divided into two groups: based on the variation of the first group (e.g. numerical/computational parameters such as grid resolution), a computer experiment is designed, the data of which may become uncertain due to the parameters of the second group (e.g. finite time-averaging). To construct a surrogate model based on uncertain data, Gaussian process regression (GPR) with observation-dependent (heteroscedastic) noise is used. To estimate the propagated uncertainties in the simulator's outputs from the first group of parameters, a probabilistic version of the polynomial chaos expansion (PCE) is employed Global sensitivity analysis is performed using probabilistic Sobol indices. To illustrate its capabilities, the framework is applied to the scale-resolving simulations of turbulent channel and lid-driven cavity flows using the open-source CFD solver Nek5000. It is shown that at wall distances where the time-averaging uncertainty is high, the quantities of interest are also more sensitive to numerical/computational parameters. In particular for high-fidelity codes such as Nek5000, a thorough assessment of the results' accuracy and reliability is crucial. The detailed analyses and the resulting conclusions can enhance our insight into the influence of different factors on physics simulations, in particular the simulations of high-Reynolds-number turbulent flows including wall turbulence.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Projection Framework for Interfacial Treatment for Computational Fluid Dynamics/Computational Structural Dynamics Simulations
    Joseph, Nishit
    Carrese, Robert
    Marzocca, Pier
    [J]. AIAA JOURNAL, 2021, 59 (06) : 2070 - 2083
  • [32] Assessing Airflow Sensitivity to Healthy and Diseased Lung Conditions in a Computational Fluid Dynamics Model Validated In Vitro
    Sul, Bora
    Oppito, Zachary
    Jayasekera, Shehan
    Vanger, Brian
    Zeller, Amy
    Morris, Michael
    Ruppert, Kai
    Altes, Talissa
    Rakesh, Vineet
    Day, Steven
    Robinson, Risa
    Reifman, Jaques
    Wallqvist, Anders
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICAL ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2018, 140 (05):
  • [33] An object-oriented framework for computational fluid dynamics
    Pérez, F
    Rivera, W
    [J]. PDPTA'03: PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PARALLEL AND DISTRIBUTED PROCESSING TECHNIQUES AND APPLICATIONS, VOLS 1-4, 2003, : 1771 - 1774
  • [34] Quantum-inspired framework for computational fluid dynamics
    Peddinti R.D.
    Pisoni S.
    Marini A.
    Lott P.
    Argentieri H.
    Tiunov E.
    Aolita L.
    [J]. Communications Physics, 2024, 7 (01)
  • [35] Finite Element Framework for Computational Fluid Dynamics in FEBIO
    Ateshian, Gerard A.
    Shim, Jay J.
    Maas, Steve A.
    Weiss, Jeffrey A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICAL ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2018, 140 (02):
  • [36] Computational fluid dynamics framework for aerodynamic model assessment
    Vallespin, D.
    Badcock, K. J.
    Da Ronch, A.
    White, M. D.
    Perfect, P.
    Ghoreyshi, M.
    [J]. PROGRESS IN AEROSPACE SCIENCES, 2012, 52 : 2 - 18
  • [37] A framework for optimization and quantification of uncertainty and sensitivity for developing carbon capture systems
    Eslick, John C.
    Ng, Brenda
    Gao, Qianwen
    Tong, Charles H.
    Sahinidis, Nikolaos V.
    Miller, David C.
    [J]. 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, GHGT-12, 2014, 63 : 1055 - 1063
  • [38] Flowfield Uncertainty Analysis for Hypersonic Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations
    Weaver, Andrew B.
    Alexeenko, Alina A.
    Greendyke, Robert B.
    Cambero, Jose A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THERMOPHYSICS AND HEAT TRANSFER, 2011, 25 (01) : 10 - 20
  • [39] SOME ASPECTS OF UNCERTAINTY IN COMPUTATIONAL FLUID-DYNAMICS RESULTS
    MEHTA, UB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1991, 113 (04): : 538 - 543
  • [40] Uncertainty quantification in computational structural dynamics: A new paradigm for model validation
    Alvin, KF
    Oberkampf, WL
    Diegert, KV
    Rutherford, BM
    [J]. IMAC - PROCEEDINGS OF THE 16TH INTERNATIONAL MODAL ANALYSIS CONFERENCE, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1998, 3243 : 1191 - 1198