Phosphorus in animal production systems

被引:4
|
作者
Dourmad, Jean-Yves [1 ]
Boudon, Anne [1 ]
Narcy, Agnes [2 ]
机构
[1] Inst Agro, PEGASE, INRAE, F-35590 St Gilles, France
[2] Univ Tours, INRAE, BOA, F-37380 Nouzilly, France
来源
INRAE PRODUCTIONS ANIMALES | 2020年 / 33卷 / 01期
关键词
EXOGENOUS PHYTASE; DEGRADATION;
D O I
10.20870/productions-animales.2020.33.1.3126
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Phosphorus in agriculture is a limited resource, as well as a potential source of pollution, when used in excess as fertilizer. Animal production systems have a major contribution to phosphorus flow at the national level, animal manure contributing to about 50% of total supplies to agricultural land, with a large variability according to regions. Animal products also largely contribute to covering human nutritional needs, with on average 60% of total dietary phosphorus supplies. Efficiency of phosphorus retention by animals is highly variable among species. The highest efficiency is found in conventional broilers, followed by pigs, "label rouge" broilers and dairy cows, laying hens and beef cows expressing a lower efficiency. However, when considering the whole farming system, phosphorus pressure is generally lower in ruminant farming systems where more agricultural area is available for manure disposal. In recent years the determination of phosphorus requirements and its digestibility have been drastically improved in farm animals allowing an important reduction of phosphorus dietary supply and excretion, with in monogastric animals the additional contribution of the use of microbial phytase to improve digestibility. Compared to nitrogen, phosphorus loss to the environment is very low, and theoretically, it should be possible to achieve a very high efficiency of phosphorus utilization in agricultural/food systems. However, this would require a perfect recycling of phosphorus from animal manure and from animal by-product, which is not yet completely achieved.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 39
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Components of sustainable animal production and the use of silvopastoral systems
    Broom, Donald Maurice
    [J]. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ZOOTECNIA-BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2017, 46 (08): : 683 - 688
  • [42] Mixed farming and intensification of animal production systems in Asia
    Devendra, C
    [J]. OUTLOOK ON AGRICULTURE, 1997, 26 (04) : 255 - 265
  • [43] Potential and Limitations of Agroforestry Systems in Animal Production in Venezuela
    Clavero, Tyrone
    [J]. REVISTA DE LA UNIVERSIDAD DEL ZULIA, 2012, 3 (05): : 9 - 20
  • [44] Definition of animal breeding goals for sustainable production systems
    Olesen, I
    Groen, AF
    Gjerde, B
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2000, 78 (03) : 570 - 582
  • [45] The environmental impact of intensive systems of animal production in the lowlands
    Atkinson, D
    Watson, CA
    [J]. ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1996, 63 : 353 - 361
  • [46] Farmed animal production in tropical circular food systems
    Oosting, Simon
    van der Lee, Jan
    Verdegem, Marc
    de Vries, Marion
    Vernooij, Adriaan
    Bonilla-Cedrez, Camila
    Kabir, Kazi
    [J]. FOOD SECURITY, 2022, 14 (01) : 273 - 292
  • [47] BSE – Epidemiology and Transmission Mechanisms in Animal Production Systems
    Marcus G Doherr
    [J]. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, 44 (Suppl 1)
  • [48] Animal health in organic livestock production systems: a review
    Kijlstra, A.
    Eijck, I. A. J. M.
    [J]. NJAS-WAGENINGEN JOURNAL OF LIFE SCIENCES, 2006, 54 (01) : 77 - 94
  • [49] Animal Husbandry and Climate Change in Organic Production Systems
    Leu, Andre
    [J]. TACKLING THE FUTURE CHALLENGES OF ORGANIC ANIMAL HUSBANDRY, 2012, 362 : 15 - 18
  • [50] THE ENERGY ANALYSIS OF FOOD-PRODUCTION SYSTEMS AND THE ROLE OF ANIMAL PRODUCTION - A REVIEW
    SALA, OE
    [J]. TURRIALBA, 1986, 36 (01): : 91 - 97