共 33 条
Concurrent validity of the ActiGraph GT3X+and activPAL for assessing sedentary behaviour in 2-3-year-old children under free-living conditions
被引:4
|作者:
Pereira, Joao R.
[1
,2
]
Sousa-Sa, Eduarda
[1
]
Zhang, Zhiguang
[1
]
Cliff, Dylan P.
[1
,3
]
Santos, Rute
[1
,4
,5
]
机构:
[1] Univ Wollongong, Fac Social Sci, Early Start, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Coimbra, CIDAF, Res Unit Sport & Phys Act, Coimbra, Portugal
[3] Univ Wollongong, IHMRI, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Porto, Res Ctr Phys Act Hlth & Leisure CIAFEL, Porto, Portugal
[5] Univ Lusofona Humanidades & Tecnol, Lisbon, Portugal
基金:
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词:
Toddler;
Sitting time;
Activity device;
Equivalence;
ACCELEROMETER CUT-POINTS;
PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY;
VALIDATION;
CALIBRATION;
ISSUES;
WRIST;
D O I:
10.1016/j.jsams.2019.08.009
中图分类号:
G8 [体育];
学科分类号:
04 ;
0403 ;
摘要:
Objectives: ActiGraph accelerometer cut-points are commonly used to classify sedentary behaviour (SB) in young children. However, they vary from 5counts/5 s to 301counts/15 s, resulting in different estimates and inconsistent findings. The aim was to examine the concurrent validity of ActiGraph GT3X +cut-points against the activPAL for measuring SB in 2-3-year-olds during free-living conditions. Design: Observational validation-study. Methods: Sixty children were fitted with the activPAL and ActiGraph simultaneously for at least 2 h. Nine ActiGraph cut-points ranging from 60 to 1488 counts per minute were used to derive SB. Bland & Altman plots and equivalent tests were performed to assess agreement between methods. Results: Estimates of SB according to the different ActiGraph cut-points were not within the activPAL +/- 10% equivalent interval (-4.05; 4.05%). The ActiGraph cut-points that showed the lower bias were 48counts/15 s (equivalence lower limit: p= 0.597; equivalence upper limit: p <0.001; bias: -4.46%; limits of agreement [LoA]: -21.07 to 30.00%) and 5counts/5s (equivalence lower limit: p < 0.001; equivalence upper limit: p= 0.737; bias: -5.11%; LoA: 30.43 to 20.20%). For the 25counts/15s, 37counts/15s and 48counts/15s ActiGraph cut-points, the upper limits were within the equivalent interval (p < 0.001) but not the lower limits (p > 0.05). When using the 5counts/5s and 181counts/15s ActiGraph cut-points, lower limits were within the equivalent interval (p < 0.001) but not the upper limits (p> 0.05). Confidence intervals of the remaining ActiGraph cut-points lie outside the equivalent interval. Conclusions: Although none of the ActiGraph cut-points provided estimates of SB that were equivalent to activPAL; estimates from 48counts/15 s and 5counts/5 s displayed the smallest mean bias ((5) over tilde%). (C) 2019 Sports Medicine Australia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 156
页数:6
相关论文