Concurrent validity of the ActiGraph GT3X+and activPAL for assessing sedentary behaviour in 2-3-year-old children under free-living conditions

被引:4
|
作者
Pereira, Joao R. [1 ,2 ]
Sousa-Sa, Eduarda [1 ]
Zhang, Zhiguang [1 ]
Cliff, Dylan P. [1 ,3 ]
Santos, Rute [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wollongong, Fac Social Sci, Early Start, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Coimbra, CIDAF, Res Unit Sport & Phys Act, Coimbra, Portugal
[3] Univ Wollongong, IHMRI, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Porto, Res Ctr Phys Act Hlth & Leisure CIAFEL, Porto, Portugal
[5] Univ Lusofona Humanidades & Tecnol, Lisbon, Portugal
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Toddler; Sitting time; Activity device; Equivalence; ACCELEROMETER CUT-POINTS; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; VALIDATION; CALIBRATION; ISSUES; WRIST;
D O I
10.1016/j.jsams.2019.08.009
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Objectives: ActiGraph accelerometer cut-points are commonly used to classify sedentary behaviour (SB) in young children. However, they vary from 5counts/5 s to 301counts/15 s, resulting in different estimates and inconsistent findings. The aim was to examine the concurrent validity of ActiGraph GT3X +cut-points against the activPAL for measuring SB in 2-3-year-olds during free-living conditions. Design: Observational validation-study. Methods: Sixty children were fitted with the activPAL and ActiGraph simultaneously for at least 2 h. Nine ActiGraph cut-points ranging from 60 to 1488 counts per minute were used to derive SB. Bland & Altman plots and equivalent tests were performed to assess agreement between methods. Results: Estimates of SB according to the different ActiGraph cut-points were not within the activPAL +/- 10% equivalent interval (-4.05; 4.05%). The ActiGraph cut-points that showed the lower bias were 48counts/15 s (equivalence lower limit: p= 0.597; equivalence upper limit: p <0.001; bias: -4.46%; limits of agreement [LoA]: -21.07 to 30.00%) and 5counts/5s (equivalence lower limit: p < 0.001; equivalence upper limit: p= 0.737; bias: -5.11%; LoA: 30.43 to 20.20%). For the 25counts/15s, 37counts/15s and 48counts/15s ActiGraph cut-points, the upper limits were within the equivalent interval (p < 0.001) but not the lower limits (p > 0.05). When using the 5counts/5s and 181counts/15s ActiGraph cut-points, lower limits were within the equivalent interval (p < 0.001) but not the upper limits (p> 0.05). Confidence intervals of the remaining ActiGraph cut-points lie outside the equivalent interval. Conclusions: Although none of the ActiGraph cut-points provided estimates of SB that were equivalent to activPAL; estimates from 48counts/15 s and 5counts/5 s displayed the smallest mean bias ((5) over tilde%). (C) 2019 Sports Medicine Australia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 156
页数:6
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] The Comparison Of Free-living Sedentary Time Using The Activpal3 Micro And The ActiGraph Gt3x.
    Hayes, Grainne
    Dowd, Kieran P.
    Powell, Cormac
    MacDonncha, Ciaran
    Donnelly, Alan E.
    [J]. MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2016, 48 (05): : 314 - 314
  • [2] Concurrent Validity of Actigraph-Determined Sedentary Time Against the Activpal Under Free-Living Conditions in a Sample of Bus Drivers
    Mato, Veronica Varela
    Yates, Thomas
    Stensel, David
    Biddle, Stuart
    Clemes, Stacy A.
    [J]. MEASUREMENT IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION AND EXERCISE SCIENCE, 2017, 21 (04) : 212 - 222
  • [3] Validity of GT3X and Actiheart to estimate sedentary time and breaks using ActivPAL as the reference in free-living conditions
    Judice, Pedro B.
    Santos, Diana A.
    Hamilton, Marc T.
    Sardinha, Luis B.
    Silva, Analiza M.
    [J]. GAIT & POSTURE, 2015, 41 (04) : 917 - 922
  • [4] Reliability of the Actigraph GT3X+Accelerometer in Adults under Free-Living Conditions
    Aadland, Eivind
    Ylvisaker, Einar
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (08):
  • [5] ActiGraph GT3X+cut-points for identifying sedentary behaviour in older adults in free-living environments
    Aguilar-Farias, Nicolas
    Brown, Wendy J.
    Peeters, G. M. E. E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND MEDICINE IN SPORT, 2014, 17 (03) : 293 - 299
  • [6] Assessing Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior under Free-Living Conditions: Comparison of Active Style Pro HJA-350IT and ActiGraph™ GT3X+
    Yano, Shohei
    Koohsari, Mohammad Javad
    Shibata, Ai
    Ishii, Kaori
    Mavoa, Suzanne
    Oka, Koichiro
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 16 (17)
  • [7] A comparison of the Actigraph GT1M and GT3X accelerometers under standardized and free-living conditions
    Kaminsky, Leonard A.
    Ozemek, Cemal
    [J]. PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2012, 33 (11) : 1869 - 1876
  • [8] Estimating physical activity and sedentary behaviour in a free-living environment: A comparative study between Fitbit Charge 2 and Actigraph GT3X
    Mikkelsen, Marie-Louise K.
    Berg-Beckhoff, Gabriele
    Frederiksen, Peder
    Horgan, Graham
    O'Driscoll, Ruairi
    Palmeira, Antonio L.
    Scott, Sarah E.
    Stubbs, James
    Heitman, Berit L.
    Larsen, Sofus C.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (06):
  • [9] Comparison of ActiGraph GT3X+and Actical accelerometer data in 9-11-year-old Canadian children
    Borghese, M. M.
    Tremblay, M. S.
    LeBlanc, A. G.
    Leduc, G.
    Boyer, C.
    Chaput, J. P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES, 2017, 35 (06) : 517 - 524
  • [10] Wear compliance, sedentary behaviour and activity in free-living children from hip-and wrist-mounted ActiGraph GT3X+accelerometers
    McLellan, Gillian
    Arthur, Rosie
    Buchan, Duncan S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES, 2018, 36 (21) : 2424 - 2430