Does carbon emission trading improve low-carbon technical efficiency? Evidence from China

被引:37
|
作者
Cai, Wugan [1 ]
Ye, Peiyun [1 ]
机构
[1] Fuzhou Univ, Sch Econ & Management, 2 Xueyuan Rd, Fuzhou 350108, Fujian, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Carbon emission trading; Low-carbon technical efficiency; Semi-disposability; Augmented difference in differences; ENVIRONMENTAL-REGULATION; ELECTRICITY-GENERATION; UNDESIRABLE OUTPUTS; PORTER HYPOTHESIS; INNOVATION; PRODUCTIVITY; PERFORMANCE; ENERGY; TRANSFORMATION; DECOMPOSITION;
D O I
10.1016/j.spc.2021.09.024
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
With the growing severe challenges of the climate change, improving low-carbon technical efficiency (LTE) is considered as the most important way to facilitate the low-carbon development. Whether or not China's carbon emission trading (CET) can facilitate the LTE deserves deep exploration. Through the introduction of a more scientific semi-disposability assumption for undesirable output, this paper first calculates China's provincial LTE based on a non-radial and non-oriented data envelopment analysis (DEA) method and analyses the reasons for inefficiency. Furthermore, we explore the impacts and mechanisms of CET on the LTE using augmented difference in differences (augmented DID) model. The results show that China's provincial LTE is not satisfactory which presents a downward trend after experiencing a transient rise. The insufficient low carbon innovation output is the crucial impeding the LTE. The implement the CET pilots has improved the LTE and the promotion effect are mainly through strengthening innovation support and capital concentration, while the mediating effects of innovation synergy degree and talents concentration are not significant. Therefore, it is essential for the Chinese government to push forward the scientific construction of national carbon trading market rather than increase the inputs blindly, so as to stimulate the innovative vitality of enterprises as innovation subjects. (C) 2021 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:46 / 56
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Carbon emission trading scheme and corporate labor investment efficiency: evidence from China
    Ma, Jiejing
    Xiang, Yujing
    Bai, Xiuwei
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (39) : 90830 - 90843
  • [32] The impact of carbon emission trading policy on energy efficiency-evidence from China
    Xie, Yunyan
    Guo, Yifan
    Zhao, Xing
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (48) : 105986 - 105998
  • [33] Does carbon emission trading contribute to reducing infectious diseases? Evidence from China
    Hao, Yu
    Li, Yujia
    Shen, Zhiyang
    GROWTH AND CHANGE, 2023, 54 (01) : 74 - 100
  • [34] Can green finance improve carbon emission efficiency? Evidence from China
    Liang, Jinhao
    Song, Xiaowei
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2022, 10
  • [35] Changes in the labor share of enterprises under the green and low-carbon transition: Empirical evidence from China's carbon emission trading pilot
    Luo, Xin
    Li, Jianti
    Feng, Dawei
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (04):
  • [36] Does "low-carbon city" accelerate urban innovation? Evidence from China
    Zou, Chen
    Huang, Yongchun
    Wu, Shangshuo
    Hu, Shiliang
    SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2022, 83
  • [37] How does urbanization affect carbon emission efficiency? Evidence from China
    Sun, Wei
    Huang, Chenchen
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 272 (272)
  • [38] Does low-carbon travel intention really lead to actual low-carbon travel? Evidence from urban residents in China
    Lin, Boqiang
    Wang, Xia
    ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICY, 2021, 72 : 743 - 756
  • [39] Does the coexistence of carbon emission trading and energy efficiency trading make sense? The case of China
    Li, Jia-lin
    Chi, Yuan-ying
    Li, Yuan
    Pang, Yuexia
    Jin, Feng
    ENERGY REPORTS, 2022, 8 : 710 - 721
  • [40] Does business environment optimization improve carbon emission efficiency? Evidence from provincial panel data in China
    Peiyu Li
    Xinzhi Liu
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2024, 31 : 24077 - 24098