Return-to-Sport Outcomes After Primary Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction With Palmaris Versus Hamstring Tendon Grafts: A Systematic Review

被引:5
|
作者
Trofa, David P. [1 ]
Constant, Michael [1 ]
Crutchfield, Connor R. [1 ]
Dantzker, Nicholas J. [1 ]
Saltzman, Bryan M. [1 ]
Lynch, T. Sean [1 ]
Ahmad, Christopher S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Irving Med Ctr, Dept Orthoped, 161 Ft Washington Ave, New York, NY 10032 USA
关键词
hamstring; palmaris longus; return to sport (RTS); Tommy John surgery; ulnar collateral ligament; MUSCLE-SPLITTING APPROACH; TOMMY JOHN SURGERY; ELBOW; PERFORMANCE; ALLOGRAFT; INJURIES;
D O I
10.1177/23259671211055726
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction is the current gold standard of treatment for overhead athletes with a symptomatic, deficient UCL of the elbow who have failed nonoperative treatment and wish to return to sport (RTS) at a high level. The palmaris longus and hamstring tendons are common graft choices, but no study has analyzed the existing literature to assess whether one graft is superior to the other. Purpose: To systematically report on the outcomes of UCL reconstruction using palmaris and hamstring autografts. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A combination of the terms "ulnar collateral ligament," "valgus instability," "Tommy John surgery," "hamstring," and "palmaris longus" were searched in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. RTS and return-to-same-level (RSL) rates, patient-reported outcomes, and complications were included for analysis. We used the modified Coleman Methodology Score and risk-of-bias tool for nonrandomized studies to assess the quality of the included studies. Results: This review included 6 studies (combined total of 2154 elbows) that directly compared palmaris and hamstring graft use in UCL reconstruction. Follow-up ranged from 24 to 80.4 months, and the mean patient age across all studies was 21.8 years. The mean RSL across all studies and grafts was 79.0%, and the mean RTS was 84.1%, consistent with results previously reported in the literature. The mean RTS and RSL rates for the palmaris graft group were 84.6% and 82%, respectively; the hamstring graft group showed mean RTS and RSL rates of 80.8% and 80.8%. Meta-analysis revealed no significant difference in RSL between the 2 graft groups (odds ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.77-1.46). The combined complication rate of the included studies was 18.2%, with failure rates ranging from 0% to 7.1%. Conclusion: Results of this review indicated that both palmaris and hamstring tendon grafts are viable options for primary UCL reconstruction. Graft choice should be determined by a combination of patient and surgeon preference.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Do Clinical Results and Return-to-Sport Rates After Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Differ Based on Graft Choice and Surgical Technique?
    Erickson, Brandon J.
    Cvetanovich, Gregory L.
    Frank, Rachel M.
    Bach, Bernard R.
    Cohen, Mark S.
    Bush-Joseph, Charles A.
    Cole, Brian J.
    Romeo, Anthony A.
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2016, 4 (11):
  • [12] Return to Sport After Proximal Hamstring Tendon Repair: A Systematic Review
    Belk, John W.
    Kraeutler, Matthew J.
    Mei-Dan, Omer
    Houck, Darby A.
    McCarty, Eric C.
    Mulcahey, Mary K.
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2019, 7 (06)
  • [13] The success of return to sport after ulnar collateral ligament injury in baseball: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Peters, Scott D.
    Bullock, Garrett S.
    Goode, Adam P.
    Garrigues, Grant E.
    Ruch, David S.
    Reiman, Michael P.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2018, 27 (03) : 561 - 571
  • [14] Ulnar Nerve Complications After Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction of the Elbow A Systematic Review
    Clain, Jason B.
    Vitale, Mark A.
    Ahmad, Christopher S.
    Ruchelsman, David E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2019, 47 (05): : 1263 - 1269
  • [15] Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction in Adolescents: A Systematic Review
    Hadley, Christopher J.
    Edelman, David
    Arevalo, Alfonso
    Patel, Nimit
    Ciccotti, Michael G.
    Dodson, Christopher C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2021, 49 (05): : 1355 - 1362
  • [16] A Systematic Review of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Techniques
    Watson, Jonathan N.
    McQueen, Peter
    Hutchinson, Mark R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2014, 42 (10): : 2510 - 2516
  • [17] Do Outcomes or Subsequent Injuries Differ Following Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Using Palmaris vs. Hamstring Autograft?
    Dines, Joshua
    Erickson, Brandon
    Chalmers, Peter
    D'Angelo, John
    Ma, Kevin
    Romeo, Anthony
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2019, 51 (06): : 8 - 8
  • [18] "Ligamentization" in Hamstring Tendon Grafts After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of the Literature and a Glimpse Into the Future
    Pauzenberger, Leo
    Syre, Stefanie
    Schurz, Mark
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2013, 29 (10): : 1712 - 1721
  • [19] Return-to-Sport Criteria After Upper Extremity Surgery in Athletes-A Scoping Review, Part 2: Ulnar Collateral Ligament of the Elbow Procedures
    Griffith, Rebecca
    Bolia, Ioanna K.
    Fretes, Nickolas
    Murray, Iain R.
    Meyer, John
    Weber, Alexander E.
    Gamradt, Seth C.
    Petrigliano, Frank A.
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2021, 9 (08)
  • [20] Return to Sport After Nonoperative Management of Elbow Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Gopinatth, Varun
    Batra, Anjay K.
    Khan, Zeeshan A.
    Jackson, Garrett R.
    Jawanda, Harkirat S.
    Mameri, Enzo S.
    McCormick, Johnathon R.
    Knapik, Derrick M.
    Chahla, Jorge
    Verma, Nikhil N.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2023, 51 (14): : 3858 - 3869