Current Practices in Microvascular Reconstruction by Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons

被引:3
|
作者
Sayre, Kelly S. [1 ,2 ]
Kovatch, Kevin J. [3 ,4 ]
Hanks, John E. [3 ,5 ]
Stucken, Chaz L. [3 ]
Ward, Brent B. [6 ]
机构
[1] Michigan Med, Dept Surg, Sect Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Oral Oncol & Microvasc Reconstruct Surg, Birmingham, AL USA
[3] Michigan Med, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[4] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Head & Neck Oncol & Reconstruct Surg, Nashville, TN USA
[5] Boston Univ, Vet Adm Med Ctr, Otolaryngol, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[6] Michigan Med, Dept Surg, Sch Dent, Ann Arbor, MI USA
关键词
NECK-CANCER SURGERY; FLAP RECONSTRUCTION; HEAD; CARE; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.joms.2021.04.008
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: Microvascular free tissue transfer (MFTT) is a reliable reconstructive option with variation in perioperative care and a general lack of clinical practice guidelines. Oral and maxillofacial surgeons' (OMSs) current MFTT perioperative practices in the United States have not been described. This study describes these practices including surgeon practice environment, operative practices, perioperative management, and success. Methods: The study design is cross sectional. The sample is composed of OMSs who completed an Oral/Head and Neck Oncologic and Microvascular Surgery Fellowship prior to 2018 in the United States. Data were collected by means of a survey of the study sample. Descriptive statistics were reported. Results: Forty surgeons responded to the survey for a response rate of 33.9%. Respondents were 97.5% (n = 39) male and worked in private (n = 8), combination (n = 10), and academic practices (n = 23). Surgeons in private and academic practice performed an average of 23.3 (SD 13.9) and 48.6 (SD 28.6) flaps per year, respectively. The 2-team approach was used by 88.2% of surgeons Immediate dental implants were placed in osteocutaneous free flaps by 28.6% (n = 2) of private practice surgeons and 70% (n = 14) of academic surgeons. Postoperatively, most patients went to an intensive care unit (ICU) (82.7%, average duration 2.6 days). Anticoagulation or antiplatelet medications were routinely used with the most common choice being aspirin (77.4%, n = 24). Antibiotics were universally administered, often for 3 days or longer (74.2%, n = 23). Self-reported success rates were 95.3% (SD 4.1) and 96.0% (SD 1.7) in private and academic settings, respectively. Conclusion: This is the first report of practice trends by microvascular OMSs in the United States. The results of this study suggest that there is variation in MFTT operative and perioperative practices by individual surgeons and practice environment with minimal variation in self-reported success rates. (C) 2021 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.
引用
收藏
页码:1963 / 1969
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Oral and maxillofacial surgeons treating oral cancer: A preliminary report from the American association of oral and maxillofacial surgeons task force on oral cancer
    Kademani, Deepak
    Bell, R. Bryan
    Schmidt, Brian L.
    Blanchaert, Remy
    Fernandes, Rui
    Lambert, Paul
    Tucker, W. Mark
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2008, 66 (10) : 2151 - 2157
  • [22] Preliminary report of the use of a microvascular coupling device for arterial anastomoses in oral and maxillofacial reconstruction
    Chen, Z.
    Yu, M.
    Huang, S.
    Zhang, S.
    Li, W.
    Zhang, D.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2020, 58 (02): : 194 - 198
  • [23] Microvascular Reconstruction of the Mouth, Jaws, and Face: Experience of an Australian Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Unit
    Hoffman, Gary R.
    Islam, Shofiq
    Eisenberg, Robert L.
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2012, 70 (05) : E371 - E377
  • [24] ORAL IMPLANT FOR MAXILLOFACIAL RECONSTRUCTION
    LASH, H
    APFELBERG, DB
    MASER, MR
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 1982, 9 (04) : 278 - 281
  • [25] Palatal Injection for the Removal of Maxillary Teeth: Current Practice Among Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
    Badenoch-Jones, Emma K.
    David, Michael
    Lincoln, Trent
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2017, 75 (07) : 1376.e1 - 1376.e5
  • [26] Are oral and maxillofacial surgeons familiar with temporomandibular disorder?
    Kim, Young-Kyun
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN ASSOCIATION OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGEONS, 2023, 49 (01) : 1 - 1
  • [27] FEMALE ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGEONS CAREER CHOICES
    Delsol, Mary
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2015, 73 (06) : 1025 - 1025
  • [28] Welcome newly graduated oral and maxillofacial surgeons
    Precious, David S.
    ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY, 2012, 113 (05): : 569 - 569
  • [29] Regional migratory osteoporosis in oral and maxillofacial surgeons
    Junquera, S.
    Escobedo, M. F.
    Olay, S.
    Junquera, L. M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2019, 57 (10): : 1168 - 1170
  • [30] ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGEONS ROLE IN SERVING THE PUBLIC
    FRANK, VA
    JOURNAL OF ORAL SURGERY, 1979, 37 (09): : 624 - 624