The impact of extended pelvic lymph node dissection on the risk of hospital readmission within 180 days after robot assisted radical prostatectomy

被引:15
|
作者
Sebben, Marco [1 ]
Tafuri, Alessandro [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Shakir, Aliasger [2 ,3 ]
Pirozzi, Marco [1 ]
Processali, Tania [1 ]
Rizzetto, Riccardo [1 ]
Amigoni, Nelia [1 ]
Tiso, Leone [1 ]
De Michele, Mario [1 ]
Panunzio, Andrea [1 ]
Cerrato, Clara [1 ]
Brunelli, Matteo [4 ]
Migliorini, Filippo [1 ]
Novella, Giovanni [1 ]
De Marco, Vincenzo [1 ]
Siracusano, Salvatore [1 ]
Artibani, Walter [1 ]
Porcaro, Antonio Benito [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Verona, Azienda Osped Univ Integrata Verona, Dept Urol, Piazzale Stefani 1, I-37126 Verona, Italy
[2] Univ Southern Calif, Inst Urol, Los Angeles, CA 90007 USA
[3] Univ Southern Calif, Catherine & Joseph Aresty Dept Urol, Los Angeles, CA 90007 USA
[4] Univ Verona, Azienda Osped Univ Integrata Verona, Dept Pathol, Verona, Italy
关键词
Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy; Robotic surgery; Hospital readmission; Complications; SEMINAL-VESICLE INVASION; CLINICAL FACTORS; CANCER PATIENTS; PREDICTORS; COMPLICATIONS; GUIDELINES; CARCINOMA; PROPOSAL; DISEASE; COHORT;
D O I
10.1007/s00345-020-03094-2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To evaluate the factors associated with the risk of hospital readmission after robot assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with or without extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) for prostate cancer (PCA) over a long term. Materials and methods The risk of readmission was evaluated by clinical, pathological, and perioperative factors. Skilled and experienced surgeons performed the procedures. Patients were followed for complications and hospital readmission for a period of six months. The logistic regression model and Cox's proportional hazards assessed the association of factors with the risk of readmission. Results From January 2013 to December 2018, 890 patients underwent RARP; ePLND was performed in 495 of these patients. Hospital readmission was detected in 25 cases (2.8%); moreover, it was more frequent when RARP was performed with ePLND (4.4% of cases) than without (0.8% of patients). On the final multivariate model, ePLND was the only independent factor that was positively associated with the risk of hospital readmission (hazard ratio, HR = 5935; 95%CI 1777-19,831; p = 0.004). Conclusions Over the long term after RARP for PCA, the risk of hospital readmission is associated with ePLND. In patients who underwent RARP and ePLND, 4.4% of them had a readmission, compared to RARP alone, in which only 0.8% of cases had a readmission. When ePLND is planned for staging pelvic lymph nodes, patients should be informed of the increased risk of hospital readmission.
引用
收藏
页码:2799 / 2809
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Extraperitoneal single-site robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with extended pelvic lymph node dissection: technique and experience
    Wang, Yubo
    Li, Mingzhao
    Yao, Kai
    Zong, Zhuyinjun
    Chang, Yifan
    Liu, Yongda
    Cai, Chao
    Al Kalailah, Fadi Mousa
    Ren, Shancheng
    Zeng, Guohua
    Gu, Di
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2025, 135 (04) : 700 - 705
  • [32] Nodal yield in pelvic lymph node dissection during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared to open radical prostatectomy
    Yong, D. Z. P.
    Png, K. S.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 115 : 1 - 1
  • [33] LYMPH NODE DENSITY AND BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE IN PATIENTS POST ROBOTIC ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY WITH EXTENDED PELVIC LYMPH NODE DISSECTION
    Su, Jeannie
    Dejenie, Rebeka
    Chang, Shu-Ching
    Wilson, Timothy
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 206 : E572 - E573
  • [34] PELVIC LYMPH NODE DISSECTION DURING ROBOT ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: COMPARISION OF PREOPERATIVE AND POSTOPERATIVE DATA
    Keskin, Selcuk M.
    Tufek, Ilter
    Kural, Ali R.
    Atug, Fatih
    Akpinar, Haluk
    Obek, Can
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2011, 25 : A63 - A64
  • [35] Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection: a combined technique
    Jarzemski, Piotr
    Listopadzki, Slawomir
    Slupski, Piotr
    Jarzemski, Marcin
    Brzoszczyk, Bartosz
    Sosnowski, Roman
    VIDEOSURGERY AND OTHER MINIINVASIVE TECHNIQUES, 2020, 15 (01) : 192 - 198
  • [36] The Impact of Adding Sentinel Node Biopsy to Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection on Biochemical Recurrence in Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Grivas, Nikolaos
    Wit, Esther M. K.
    Kuusk, Teele
    KleinJan, Gijs H.
    Donswijk, Maarten L.
    van Leeuwen, Fijs W. B.
    van der Poel, Henk G.
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2018, 59 (02) : 204 - 209
  • [37] Outcomes comparison between the robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with extended pelvic lymph node dissection and neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy without extended pelvic lymph node dissection in patients with organ confined high-risk prostate cancer
    Hatakeyama, S.
    Tabata, R.
    Fujimori, D.
    Fukuda, M.
    Shinozaki, T.
    Iwamura, H.
    Okamoto, T.
    Yoneyama, T.
    Sato, S.
    Ohyama, C.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2022, 81 : S1230 - S1231
  • [38] OUTCOMES COMPARISON BETWEEN THE ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY WITH EXTENDED PELVIC LYMPH NODE DISSECTION AND NEOADJUVANT CHEMOHORMONAL THERAPY WITHOUT EXTENDED PELVIC LYMPH NODE DISSECTION IN PATIENTS WITH ORGAN CONFINED HIGH-RISK PROSTATE CANCER
    Hatakeyama, Shingo
    Tabata, Ryuji
    Fujimori, Daiji
    Fukuda, Mamoru
    Shinozaki, Tetsuo
    Iwamura, Hiromichi
    Okamoto, Teppei
    Yoneyama, Takahiro
    Sato, Satoshi
    Ohyama, Chikara
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 207 (05): : E246 - E247
  • [39] Salvage Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection after Radical Prostatectomy for Biochemical and Lymph Node Recurrence
    Peeters, Charlotte
    Ponette, Diederik
    van Poppel, Hendrik
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2017, 98 (03) : 367 - 369
  • [40] Super extended pelvic lymph node dissection during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Doing more good than harm?
    Israel, B.
    Baas, D. J. H.
    De Baaij, J.
    Sedelaar, J. P. M.
    Van Basten, J. P. A.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2023, 83 : S927 - S928