The policy implications of an uncertain carbon dioxide removal potential

被引:46
|
作者
Grant, Neil [1 ]
Hawkes, Adam [2 ]
Mittal, Shivika [1 ]
Gambhir, Ajay [1 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, Grantham Inst Climate Change & Environm, London SW7 2AZ, England
[2] Imperial Coll London, Dept Chem Engn, London SW7 2AZ, England
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”; 英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
PARIS AGREEMENT; EMISSIONS; CO2; TECHNOLOGIES; CAPTURE; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.joule.2021.09.004
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Many low-carbon scenarios rely on carbon dioxide removal (CDR) to meet decarbonization goals. The feasibility of large-scale CDR deployment is highly uncertain, and existing scenarios have been criticized for overreliance on CDR. We conduct an expert survey on the feasible potential for CDR via bioenergy with carbon capture and storage, direct air capture and afforestation. We use the survey results to represent uncertainty in future CDR availability and explore the implications in an integrated assessment model. Stochastic optimization demonstrates that uncertainty in future CDR availability provides a strong rationale to increase near-term rates of decarbonization. In scenarios with high CDR uncertainty, emissions are reduced by an additional 10 GtCO(2)e in 2030 compared with scenarios with no consideration of CDR uncertainty. This highlights the urgent need to increase ambition contained in nationally determined contributions (NDCs) for 2030, to get the world on track to deliver 1.5 degrees C and to hedge against an uncertain future CDR potential.
引用
收藏
页码:2593 / 2605
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] German citizens' preference for domestic carbon dioxide removal by afforestation is incompatible with national removal potential
    Merk, Christine
    Liebe, Ulf
    Meyerhoff, Juergen
    Rehdanz, Katrin
    COMMUNICATIONS EARTH & ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 4 (01):
  • [32] German citizens’ preference for domestic carbon dioxide removal by afforestation is incompatible with national removal potential
    Christine Merk
    Ulf Liebe
    Jürgen Meyerhoff
    Katrin Rehdanz
    Communications Earth & Environment, 4
  • [33] Carbon storage potential of harvested wood: summary and policy implications
    Ann Ingerson
    Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2011, 16 : 307 - 323
  • [34] Carbon storage potential of harvested wood: summary and policy implications
    Ingerson, Ann
    MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGIES FOR GLOBAL CHANGE, 2011, 16 (03) : 307 - 323
  • [35] The carbon dioxide removal gap
    Lamb, William F.
    Gasser, Thomas
    Roman-Cuesta, Rosa M.
    Grassi, Giacomo
    Gidden, Matthew J.
    Powis, Carter M.
    Geden, Oliver
    Nemet, Gregory
    Pratama, Yoga
    Riahi, Keywan
    Smith, Stephen M.
    Steinhauser, Jan
    Vaughan, Naomi E.
    Smith, Harry B.
    Minx, Jan C.
    NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2024, 14 (06) : 644 - 651
  • [36] Rightsizing carbon dioxide removal
    Field, Christopher B.
    Mach, Katharine J.
    SCIENCE, 2017, 356 (6339) : 706 - 707
  • [37] Controversies of carbon dioxide removal
    Anderson, Kevin
    Buck, Holly Jean
    Fuhr, Lili
    Geden, Oliver
    Peters, Glen P.
    Tamme, Eve
    NATURE REVIEWS EARTH & ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 4 (12) : 808 - 814
  • [38] Carbon Dioxide Removal Geoengineering
    Brent, Kerryn
    McDonald, Jan
    McGee, Jeffrey
    Gogarty, Brendan
    AUSTRALIAN LAW JOURNAL, 2018, 92 (10): : 830 - 838
  • [39] Carbon dioxide removal with basalt
    Guo, Yufang
    NATURE FOOD, 2024, 5 (03): : 195 - 195
  • [40] Controversies of carbon dioxide removal
    Kevin Anderson
    Holly Jean Buck
    Lili Fuhr
    Oliver Geden
    Glen P. Peters
    Eve Tamme
    Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 2023, 4 : 808 - 814